Cargando…

Evidence for Deficits in the Temporal Attention Span of Poor Readers

BACKGROUND: While poor reading is often associated with phonological deficits, many studies suggest that visual processing might also be impaired. In particular, recent research has indicated that poor readers show impaired spatial visual attention spans in partial and whole report tasks. Given the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Visser, Troy A. W.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3961209/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24651313
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0091278
_version_ 1782308251345354752
author Visser, Troy A. W.
author_facet Visser, Troy A. W.
author_sort Visser, Troy A. W.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: While poor reading is often associated with phonological deficits, many studies suggest that visual processing might also be impaired. In particular, recent research has indicated that poor readers show impaired spatial visual attention spans in partial and whole report tasks. Given the similarities between competition-based accounts for reduced visual attention span and similar explanations for impairments in sequential object processing, the present work examined whether poor readers show deficits in their “temporal attention span” – that is, their ability to rapidly and accurately process sequences of consecutive target items. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Poor and normal readers monitored a sequential stream of visual items for two (TT condition) or three (TTT condition) consecutive target digits. Target identification was examined using both unconditional and conditional measures of accuracy in order to gauge the overall likelihood of identifying a target and the likelihood of identifying a target given successful identification of previous items. Compared to normal readers, poor readers showed small but consistent deficits in identification across targets whether unconditional or conditional accuracy was used. Additionally, in the TTT condition, final-target conditional accuracy was poorer than unconditional accuracy, particularly for poor readers, suggesting a substantial cost arising from processing the previous two targets that was not present in normal readers. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: Mirroring the differences found between poor and normal readers in spatial visual attention span, the present findings suggest two principal differences between the temporal attention spans of poor and normal readers. First, the consistent pattern of reduced performance across targets suggests increased competition amongst items within the same span for poor readers. Second, the steeper decline in final target performance amongst poor readers in the TTT condition suggests a reduction in the extent of their temporal attention span.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3961209
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39612092014-03-24 Evidence for Deficits in the Temporal Attention Span of Poor Readers Visser, Troy A. W. PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: While poor reading is often associated with phonological deficits, many studies suggest that visual processing might also be impaired. In particular, recent research has indicated that poor readers show impaired spatial visual attention spans in partial and whole report tasks. Given the similarities between competition-based accounts for reduced visual attention span and similar explanations for impairments in sequential object processing, the present work examined whether poor readers show deficits in their “temporal attention span” – that is, their ability to rapidly and accurately process sequences of consecutive target items. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Poor and normal readers monitored a sequential stream of visual items for two (TT condition) or three (TTT condition) consecutive target digits. Target identification was examined using both unconditional and conditional measures of accuracy in order to gauge the overall likelihood of identifying a target and the likelihood of identifying a target given successful identification of previous items. Compared to normal readers, poor readers showed small but consistent deficits in identification across targets whether unconditional or conditional accuracy was used. Additionally, in the TTT condition, final-target conditional accuracy was poorer than unconditional accuracy, particularly for poor readers, suggesting a substantial cost arising from processing the previous two targets that was not present in normal readers. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: Mirroring the differences found between poor and normal readers in spatial visual attention span, the present findings suggest two principal differences between the temporal attention spans of poor and normal readers. First, the consistent pattern of reduced performance across targets suggests increased competition amongst items within the same span for poor readers. Second, the steeper decline in final target performance amongst poor readers in the TTT condition suggests a reduction in the extent of their temporal attention span. Public Library of Science 2014-03-20 /pmc/articles/PMC3961209/ /pubmed/24651313 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0091278 Text en © 2014 Troy A http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Visser, Troy A. W.
Evidence for Deficits in the Temporal Attention Span of Poor Readers
title Evidence for Deficits in the Temporal Attention Span of Poor Readers
title_full Evidence for Deficits in the Temporal Attention Span of Poor Readers
title_fullStr Evidence for Deficits in the Temporal Attention Span of Poor Readers
title_full_unstemmed Evidence for Deficits in the Temporal Attention Span of Poor Readers
title_short Evidence for Deficits in the Temporal Attention Span of Poor Readers
title_sort evidence for deficits in the temporal attention span of poor readers
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3961209/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24651313
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0091278
work_keys_str_mv AT vissertroyaw evidencefordeficitsinthetemporalattentionspanofpoorreaders