Cargando…

Obtaining Fruit and Vegetables for the Lowest Prices: Pricing Survey of Different Outlets and Geographical Analysis of Competition Effects

AIMS: Inadequate fruit and vegetable (F&V) consumption is an important dietary risk factor for disease internationally. High F&V prices can be a barrier to dietary intake and so to improve understanding of this topic we surveyed prices and potential competition between F&V outlet types....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pearson, Amber L., Winter, Pieta R., McBreen, Ben, Stewart, Georgia, Roets, Rianda, Nutsford, Daniel, Bowie, Christopher, Donnellan, Niamh, Wilson, Nick
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3961225/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24651475
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0089775
_version_ 1782308255543853056
author Pearson, Amber L.
Winter, Pieta R.
McBreen, Ben
Stewart, Georgia
Roets, Rianda
Nutsford, Daniel
Bowie, Christopher
Donnellan, Niamh
Wilson, Nick
author_facet Pearson, Amber L.
Winter, Pieta R.
McBreen, Ben
Stewart, Georgia
Roets, Rianda
Nutsford, Daniel
Bowie, Christopher
Donnellan, Niamh
Wilson, Nick
author_sort Pearson, Amber L.
collection PubMed
description AIMS: Inadequate fruit and vegetable (F&V) consumption is an important dietary risk factor for disease internationally. High F&V prices can be a barrier to dietary intake and so to improve understanding of this topic we surveyed prices and potential competition between F&V outlet types. METHODS: Over a three week early autumn period in 2013, prices were collected bi-weekly for 18 commonly purchased F&Vs from farmers' markets (FM) selling local produce (n = 3), other F&V markets (OFVM) (n = 5), supermarkets that neighbored markets (n = 8), and more distant supermarkets (n = 8), (in urban Wellington and Christchurch areas of New Zealand). Prices from an online supermarket were also collected. RESULTS: A total of 3120 prices were collected. Most F&Vs (13/18) were significantly cheaper at OFVMs than supermarkets. Over half of the F&Vs (10/18) were significantly cheaper at nearby compared to distant supermarkets, providing evidence of a moderate ‘halo effect’ in price reductions in supermarkets that neighbored markets. Weekend (vs midweek) prices were also significantly cheaper at nearby (vs distant) supermarkets, supporting evidence for a ‘halo effect’. Ideal weekly ‘food basket’ prices for a two adult, two child family were: OFVMs (NZ$76), online supermarket ($113), nearby supermarkets ($124), distant supermarkets ($127), and FMs ($138). This represents a savings of $49 per week (US$26) by using OFVMs relative to (non-online) supermarkets. Similarly, a shift from non-online supermarkets to the online supermarket would generate a $13 saving. CONCLUSIONS: In these locations general markets appear to be providing some substantially lower prices for fruit and vegetables than supermarkets. They also appear to be depressing prices in neighboring supermarkets. These results, when supplemented by other needed research, may help inform the case for interventions to improve access to fruit and vegetables, particularly for low-income populations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3961225
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39612252014-03-24 Obtaining Fruit and Vegetables for the Lowest Prices: Pricing Survey of Different Outlets and Geographical Analysis of Competition Effects Pearson, Amber L. Winter, Pieta R. McBreen, Ben Stewart, Georgia Roets, Rianda Nutsford, Daniel Bowie, Christopher Donnellan, Niamh Wilson, Nick PLoS One Research Article AIMS: Inadequate fruit and vegetable (F&V) consumption is an important dietary risk factor for disease internationally. High F&V prices can be a barrier to dietary intake and so to improve understanding of this topic we surveyed prices and potential competition between F&V outlet types. METHODS: Over a three week early autumn period in 2013, prices were collected bi-weekly for 18 commonly purchased F&Vs from farmers' markets (FM) selling local produce (n = 3), other F&V markets (OFVM) (n = 5), supermarkets that neighbored markets (n = 8), and more distant supermarkets (n = 8), (in urban Wellington and Christchurch areas of New Zealand). Prices from an online supermarket were also collected. RESULTS: A total of 3120 prices were collected. Most F&Vs (13/18) were significantly cheaper at OFVMs than supermarkets. Over half of the F&Vs (10/18) were significantly cheaper at nearby compared to distant supermarkets, providing evidence of a moderate ‘halo effect’ in price reductions in supermarkets that neighbored markets. Weekend (vs midweek) prices were also significantly cheaper at nearby (vs distant) supermarkets, supporting evidence for a ‘halo effect’. Ideal weekly ‘food basket’ prices for a two adult, two child family were: OFVMs (NZ$76), online supermarket ($113), nearby supermarkets ($124), distant supermarkets ($127), and FMs ($138). This represents a savings of $49 per week (US$26) by using OFVMs relative to (non-online) supermarkets. Similarly, a shift from non-online supermarkets to the online supermarket would generate a $13 saving. CONCLUSIONS: In these locations general markets appear to be providing some substantially lower prices for fruit and vegetables than supermarkets. They also appear to be depressing prices in neighboring supermarkets. These results, when supplemented by other needed research, may help inform the case for interventions to improve access to fruit and vegetables, particularly for low-income populations. Public Library of Science 2014-03-20 /pmc/articles/PMC3961225/ /pubmed/24651475 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0089775 Text en © 2014 Pearson et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Pearson, Amber L.
Winter, Pieta R.
McBreen, Ben
Stewart, Georgia
Roets, Rianda
Nutsford, Daniel
Bowie, Christopher
Donnellan, Niamh
Wilson, Nick
Obtaining Fruit and Vegetables for the Lowest Prices: Pricing Survey of Different Outlets and Geographical Analysis of Competition Effects
title Obtaining Fruit and Vegetables for the Lowest Prices: Pricing Survey of Different Outlets and Geographical Analysis of Competition Effects
title_full Obtaining Fruit and Vegetables for the Lowest Prices: Pricing Survey of Different Outlets and Geographical Analysis of Competition Effects
title_fullStr Obtaining Fruit and Vegetables for the Lowest Prices: Pricing Survey of Different Outlets and Geographical Analysis of Competition Effects
title_full_unstemmed Obtaining Fruit and Vegetables for the Lowest Prices: Pricing Survey of Different Outlets and Geographical Analysis of Competition Effects
title_short Obtaining Fruit and Vegetables for the Lowest Prices: Pricing Survey of Different Outlets and Geographical Analysis of Competition Effects
title_sort obtaining fruit and vegetables for the lowest prices: pricing survey of different outlets and geographical analysis of competition effects
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3961225/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24651475
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0089775
work_keys_str_mv AT pearsonamberl obtainingfruitandvegetablesforthelowestpricespricingsurveyofdifferentoutletsandgeographicalanalysisofcompetitioneffects
AT winterpietar obtainingfruitandvegetablesforthelowestpricespricingsurveyofdifferentoutletsandgeographicalanalysisofcompetitioneffects
AT mcbreenben obtainingfruitandvegetablesforthelowestpricespricingsurveyofdifferentoutletsandgeographicalanalysisofcompetitioneffects
AT stewartgeorgia obtainingfruitandvegetablesforthelowestpricespricingsurveyofdifferentoutletsandgeographicalanalysisofcompetitioneffects
AT roetsrianda obtainingfruitandvegetablesforthelowestpricespricingsurveyofdifferentoutletsandgeographicalanalysisofcompetitioneffects
AT nutsforddaniel obtainingfruitandvegetablesforthelowestpricespricingsurveyofdifferentoutletsandgeographicalanalysisofcompetitioneffects
AT bowiechristopher obtainingfruitandvegetablesforthelowestpricespricingsurveyofdifferentoutletsandgeographicalanalysisofcompetitioneffects
AT donnellanniamh obtainingfruitandvegetablesforthelowestpricespricingsurveyofdifferentoutletsandgeographicalanalysisofcompetitioneffects
AT wilsonnick obtainingfruitandvegetablesforthelowestpricespricingsurveyofdifferentoutletsandgeographicalanalysisofcompetitioneffects