Cargando…
A Scanning Electron Microscope Study on the Effect of an Experimental Irrigation Solution on Smear Layer Removal
Introduction: The aim of this in vitro study was to evaluate the effect of an experimental irrigation solution, containing two different concentrations of papain, Tween 80, 2% chlorhexidine and EDTA, on removal of the smear layer. Methods and Materials: Thirty-six single-rooted teeth were divided in...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Iranian Center for Endodontic Research
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3961591/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24688583 |
_version_ | 1782308319254282240 |
---|---|
author | Zand, Vahid Mokhtari, Hadi Lotfi, Mehrdad Rahimi, Saeed Sohrabi, Aydin Badamchi Zadeh, Sina Mojaver Kahnamooie, Hanieh Tehranchi, Pardis |
author_facet | Zand, Vahid Mokhtari, Hadi Lotfi, Mehrdad Rahimi, Saeed Sohrabi, Aydin Badamchi Zadeh, Sina Mojaver Kahnamooie, Hanieh Tehranchi, Pardis |
author_sort | Zand, Vahid |
collection | PubMed |
description | Introduction: The aim of this in vitro study was to evaluate the effect of an experimental irrigation solution, containing two different concentrations of papain, Tween 80, 2% chlorhexidine and EDTA, on removal of the smear layer. Methods and Materials: Thirty-six single-rooted teeth were divided into two experimental groups (n=12) and two positive and negative control groups of six. The canals were prepared with BioRaCe instruments up to BR7 (60/0.02). In group 1, canals were irrigated with a combination of 1% papain, 17% EDTA, Tween 80 and 2% CHX; in group 2, canals were irrigated with a combination of 0.1% papain, 17% EDTA, Tween 80 and 2% CHX. In group 3 (the negative control), the canal was irrigated with 2.5% NaOCl during instrumentation and at the end of preparation with 1 mL of 17% EDTA was used; in group 4 (positive control), normal saline was used for irrigation. The amount of the remaining smear layer was quantified according to Hulsmann method using scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Data was analyzed by the Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney tests. Results: Two-by-two comparisons of the groups revealed no significant differences in terms of smear layer removal at different canal sections between the negative control group (standard regiment for smear layer removal) and 1% papain groups (P<0.05). Conclusion: Under the limitations of the present study, combination of 1% papain, EDTA, 2% chlorhexidine and Tween 80 can effectively remove smear layer from canal walls. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3961591 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Iranian Center for Endodontic Research |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-39615912014-04-01 A Scanning Electron Microscope Study on the Effect of an Experimental Irrigation Solution on Smear Layer Removal Zand, Vahid Mokhtari, Hadi Lotfi, Mehrdad Rahimi, Saeed Sohrabi, Aydin Badamchi Zadeh, Sina Mojaver Kahnamooie, Hanieh Tehranchi, Pardis Iran Endod J Original Article Introduction: The aim of this in vitro study was to evaluate the effect of an experimental irrigation solution, containing two different concentrations of papain, Tween 80, 2% chlorhexidine and EDTA, on removal of the smear layer. Methods and Materials: Thirty-six single-rooted teeth were divided into two experimental groups (n=12) and two positive and negative control groups of six. The canals were prepared with BioRaCe instruments up to BR7 (60/0.02). In group 1, canals were irrigated with a combination of 1% papain, 17% EDTA, Tween 80 and 2% CHX; in group 2, canals were irrigated with a combination of 0.1% papain, 17% EDTA, Tween 80 and 2% CHX. In group 3 (the negative control), the canal was irrigated with 2.5% NaOCl during instrumentation and at the end of preparation with 1 mL of 17% EDTA was used; in group 4 (positive control), normal saline was used for irrigation. The amount of the remaining smear layer was quantified according to Hulsmann method using scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Data was analyzed by the Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney tests. Results: Two-by-two comparisons of the groups revealed no significant differences in terms of smear layer removal at different canal sections between the negative control group (standard regiment for smear layer removal) and 1% papain groups (P<0.05). Conclusion: Under the limitations of the present study, combination of 1% papain, EDTA, 2% chlorhexidine and Tween 80 can effectively remove smear layer from canal walls. Iranian Center for Endodontic Research 2014 2014-03-08 /pmc/articles/PMC3961591/ /pubmed/24688583 Text en © 2014, Iranian Center for Endodontic Research This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Zand, Vahid Mokhtari, Hadi Lotfi, Mehrdad Rahimi, Saeed Sohrabi, Aydin Badamchi Zadeh, Sina Mojaver Kahnamooie, Hanieh Tehranchi, Pardis A Scanning Electron Microscope Study on the Effect of an Experimental Irrigation Solution on Smear Layer Removal |
title | A Scanning Electron Microscope Study on the Effect of an Experimental Irrigation Solution on Smear Layer Removal |
title_full | A Scanning Electron Microscope Study on the Effect of an Experimental Irrigation Solution on Smear Layer Removal |
title_fullStr | A Scanning Electron Microscope Study on the Effect of an Experimental Irrigation Solution on Smear Layer Removal |
title_full_unstemmed | A Scanning Electron Microscope Study on the Effect of an Experimental Irrigation Solution on Smear Layer Removal |
title_short | A Scanning Electron Microscope Study on the Effect of an Experimental Irrigation Solution on Smear Layer Removal |
title_sort | scanning electron microscope study on the effect of an experimental irrigation solution on smear layer removal |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3961591/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24688583 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zandvahid ascanningelectronmicroscopestudyontheeffectofanexperimentalirrigationsolutiononsmearlayerremoval AT mokhtarihadi ascanningelectronmicroscopestudyontheeffectofanexperimentalirrigationsolutiononsmearlayerremoval AT lotfimehrdad ascanningelectronmicroscopestudyontheeffectofanexperimentalirrigationsolutiononsmearlayerremoval AT rahimisaeed ascanningelectronmicroscopestudyontheeffectofanexperimentalirrigationsolutiononsmearlayerremoval AT sohrabiaydin ascanningelectronmicroscopestudyontheeffectofanexperimentalirrigationsolutiononsmearlayerremoval AT badamchizadehsina ascanningelectronmicroscopestudyontheeffectofanexperimentalirrigationsolutiononsmearlayerremoval AT mojaverkahnamooiehanieh ascanningelectronmicroscopestudyontheeffectofanexperimentalirrigationsolutiononsmearlayerremoval AT tehranchipardis ascanningelectronmicroscopestudyontheeffectofanexperimentalirrigationsolutiononsmearlayerremoval AT zandvahid scanningelectronmicroscopestudyontheeffectofanexperimentalirrigationsolutiononsmearlayerremoval AT mokhtarihadi scanningelectronmicroscopestudyontheeffectofanexperimentalirrigationsolutiononsmearlayerremoval AT lotfimehrdad scanningelectronmicroscopestudyontheeffectofanexperimentalirrigationsolutiononsmearlayerremoval AT rahimisaeed scanningelectronmicroscopestudyontheeffectofanexperimentalirrigationsolutiononsmearlayerremoval AT sohrabiaydin scanningelectronmicroscopestudyontheeffectofanexperimentalirrigationsolutiononsmearlayerremoval AT badamchizadehsina scanningelectronmicroscopestudyontheeffectofanexperimentalirrigationsolutiononsmearlayerremoval AT mojaverkahnamooiehanieh scanningelectronmicroscopestudyontheeffectofanexperimentalirrigationsolutiononsmearlayerremoval AT tehranchipardis scanningelectronmicroscopestudyontheeffectofanexperimentalirrigationsolutiononsmearlayerremoval |