Cargando…

Analysis of Frequency of Use of Different Scar Assessment Scales Based on the Scar Condition and Treatment Method

Analysis of scars in various conditions is essential, but no consensus had been reached on the scar assessment scale to select for a given condition. We reviewed papers to determine the scar assessment scale selected depending on the scar condition and treatment method. We searched PubMed for articl...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bae, Seong Hwan, Bae, Yong Chan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Korean Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3961606/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24665417
http://dx.doi.org/10.5999/aps.2014.41.2.111
_version_ 1782308322211266560
author Bae, Seong Hwan
Bae, Yong Chan
author_facet Bae, Seong Hwan
Bae, Yong Chan
author_sort Bae, Seong Hwan
collection PubMed
description Analysis of scars in various conditions is essential, but no consensus had been reached on the scar assessment scale to select for a given condition. We reviewed papers to determine the scar assessment scale selected depending on the scar condition and treatment method. We searched PubMed for articles published since 2000 with the contents of the scar evaluation using a scar assessment scale with a Journal Citation Report impact factor >0.5. Among them, 96 articles that conducted a scar evaluation using a scar assessment scale were reviewed and analyzed. The scar assessment scales were identified and organized by various criteria. Among the types of scar assessment scales, the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS) was found to be the most frequently used scale. As for the assessment of newly developed operative scars, the POSAS was most used. Meanwhile, for categories depending on the treatment methods for preexisting scars, the Vancouver Scar Scale (VSS) was used in 6 studies following a laser treatment, the POSAS was used in 7 studies following surgical treatment, and the POSAS was used in 7 studies following a conservative treatment. Within the 12 categories of scar status, the VSS showed the highest frequency in 6 categories and the POSAS showed the highest frequency in the other 6 categories. According to our reviews, the POSAS and VSS are the most frequently used scar assessment scales. In the future, an optimal, universal scar scoring system is needed in order to better evaluate and treat pathologic scarring.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3961606
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher The Korean Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39616062014-03-24 Analysis of Frequency of Use of Different Scar Assessment Scales Based on the Scar Condition and Treatment Method Bae, Seong Hwan Bae, Yong Chan Arch Plast Surg Review Article Analysis of scars in various conditions is essential, but no consensus had been reached on the scar assessment scale to select for a given condition. We reviewed papers to determine the scar assessment scale selected depending on the scar condition and treatment method. We searched PubMed for articles published since 2000 with the contents of the scar evaluation using a scar assessment scale with a Journal Citation Report impact factor >0.5. Among them, 96 articles that conducted a scar evaluation using a scar assessment scale were reviewed and analyzed. The scar assessment scales were identified and organized by various criteria. Among the types of scar assessment scales, the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS) was found to be the most frequently used scale. As for the assessment of newly developed operative scars, the POSAS was most used. Meanwhile, for categories depending on the treatment methods for preexisting scars, the Vancouver Scar Scale (VSS) was used in 6 studies following a laser treatment, the POSAS was used in 7 studies following surgical treatment, and the POSAS was used in 7 studies following a conservative treatment. Within the 12 categories of scar status, the VSS showed the highest frequency in 6 categories and the POSAS showed the highest frequency in the other 6 categories. According to our reviews, the POSAS and VSS are the most frequently used scar assessment scales. In the future, an optimal, universal scar scoring system is needed in order to better evaluate and treat pathologic scarring. The Korean Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons 2014-03 2014-03-12 /pmc/articles/PMC3961606/ /pubmed/24665417 http://dx.doi.org/10.5999/aps.2014.41.2.111 Text en Copyright © 2014 The Korean Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/), which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review Article
Bae, Seong Hwan
Bae, Yong Chan
Analysis of Frequency of Use of Different Scar Assessment Scales Based on the Scar Condition and Treatment Method
title Analysis of Frequency of Use of Different Scar Assessment Scales Based on the Scar Condition and Treatment Method
title_full Analysis of Frequency of Use of Different Scar Assessment Scales Based on the Scar Condition and Treatment Method
title_fullStr Analysis of Frequency of Use of Different Scar Assessment Scales Based on the Scar Condition and Treatment Method
title_full_unstemmed Analysis of Frequency of Use of Different Scar Assessment Scales Based on the Scar Condition and Treatment Method
title_short Analysis of Frequency of Use of Different Scar Assessment Scales Based on the Scar Condition and Treatment Method
title_sort analysis of frequency of use of different scar assessment scales based on the scar condition and treatment method
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3961606/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24665417
http://dx.doi.org/10.5999/aps.2014.41.2.111
work_keys_str_mv AT baeseonghwan analysisoffrequencyofuseofdifferentscarassessmentscalesbasedonthescarconditionandtreatmentmethod
AT baeyongchan analysisoffrequencyofuseofdifferentscarassessmentscalesbasedonthescarconditionandtreatmentmethod