Cargando…

Free Flap Reconstruction of Head and Neck Defects after Oncologic Ablation: One Surgeon's Outcomes in 42 Cases

BACKGROUND: Free flap surgery for head and neck defects has gained popularity as an advanced microvascular surgical technique. The aims of this study are first, to determine whether the known risk factors such as comorbidity, tobacco use, obesity, and radiation increase the complications of a free f...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lim, Yun Sub, Kim, Jun Sik, Kim, Nam Gyun, Lee, Kyung Suk, Choi, Jae Hoon, Park, Sang Woo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Korean Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3961612/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24665423
http://dx.doi.org/10.5999/aps.2014.41.2.148
_version_ 1782308323572318208
author Lim, Yun Sub
Kim, Jun Sik
Kim, Nam Gyun
Lee, Kyung Suk
Choi, Jae Hoon
Park, Sang Woo
author_facet Lim, Yun Sub
Kim, Jun Sik
Kim, Nam Gyun
Lee, Kyung Suk
Choi, Jae Hoon
Park, Sang Woo
author_sort Lim, Yun Sub
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Free flap surgery for head and neck defects has gained popularity as an advanced microvascular surgical technique. The aims of this study are first, to determine whether the known risk factors such as comorbidity, tobacco use, obesity, and radiation increase the complications of a free flap transfer, and second, to identify the incidence of complications in a radial forearm free flap and an anterolateral thigh perforator flap. METHODS: We reviewed the medical records of patients with head and neck cancer who underwent reconstruction with free flap between May 1994 and May 2012 at our department of plastic and reconstructive surgery. RESULTS: The patients included 36 men and 6 women, with a mean age of 59.38 years. The most common primary tumor site was the tongue (38%). The most commonly used free flap was the radial forearm free flap (57%), followed by the anterolateral thigh perforator free flap (22%). There was no occurrence of free flap failure. In this study, risk factors of the patients did not increase the occurrence of complications. In addition, no statistically significant differences in complications were observed between the radial forearm free flap and anterolateral thigh perforator free flap. CONCLUSIONS: We could conclude that the risk factors of the patient did not increase the complications of a free flap transfer. Therefore, the risk factors of patients are no longer a negative factor for a free flap transfer.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3961612
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher The Korean Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39616122014-03-24 Free Flap Reconstruction of Head and Neck Defects after Oncologic Ablation: One Surgeon's Outcomes in 42 Cases Lim, Yun Sub Kim, Jun Sik Kim, Nam Gyun Lee, Kyung Suk Choi, Jae Hoon Park, Sang Woo Arch Plast Surg Original Article BACKGROUND: Free flap surgery for head and neck defects has gained popularity as an advanced microvascular surgical technique. The aims of this study are first, to determine whether the known risk factors such as comorbidity, tobacco use, obesity, and radiation increase the complications of a free flap transfer, and second, to identify the incidence of complications in a radial forearm free flap and an anterolateral thigh perforator flap. METHODS: We reviewed the medical records of patients with head and neck cancer who underwent reconstruction with free flap between May 1994 and May 2012 at our department of plastic and reconstructive surgery. RESULTS: The patients included 36 men and 6 women, with a mean age of 59.38 years. The most common primary tumor site was the tongue (38%). The most commonly used free flap was the radial forearm free flap (57%), followed by the anterolateral thigh perforator free flap (22%). There was no occurrence of free flap failure. In this study, risk factors of the patients did not increase the occurrence of complications. In addition, no statistically significant differences in complications were observed between the radial forearm free flap and anterolateral thigh perforator free flap. CONCLUSIONS: We could conclude that the risk factors of the patient did not increase the complications of a free flap transfer. Therefore, the risk factors of patients are no longer a negative factor for a free flap transfer. The Korean Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons 2014-03 2014-03-12 /pmc/articles/PMC3961612/ /pubmed/24665423 http://dx.doi.org/10.5999/aps.2014.41.2.148 Text en Copyright © 2014 The Korean Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/), which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Lim, Yun Sub
Kim, Jun Sik
Kim, Nam Gyun
Lee, Kyung Suk
Choi, Jae Hoon
Park, Sang Woo
Free Flap Reconstruction of Head and Neck Defects after Oncologic Ablation: One Surgeon's Outcomes in 42 Cases
title Free Flap Reconstruction of Head and Neck Defects after Oncologic Ablation: One Surgeon's Outcomes in 42 Cases
title_full Free Flap Reconstruction of Head and Neck Defects after Oncologic Ablation: One Surgeon's Outcomes in 42 Cases
title_fullStr Free Flap Reconstruction of Head and Neck Defects after Oncologic Ablation: One Surgeon's Outcomes in 42 Cases
title_full_unstemmed Free Flap Reconstruction of Head and Neck Defects after Oncologic Ablation: One Surgeon's Outcomes in 42 Cases
title_short Free Flap Reconstruction of Head and Neck Defects after Oncologic Ablation: One Surgeon's Outcomes in 42 Cases
title_sort free flap reconstruction of head and neck defects after oncologic ablation: one surgeon's outcomes in 42 cases
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3961612/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24665423
http://dx.doi.org/10.5999/aps.2014.41.2.148
work_keys_str_mv AT limyunsub freeflapreconstructionofheadandneckdefectsafteroncologicablationonesurgeonsoutcomesin42cases
AT kimjunsik freeflapreconstructionofheadandneckdefectsafteroncologicablationonesurgeonsoutcomesin42cases
AT kimnamgyun freeflapreconstructionofheadandneckdefectsafteroncologicablationonesurgeonsoutcomesin42cases
AT leekyungsuk freeflapreconstructionofheadandneckdefectsafteroncologicablationonesurgeonsoutcomesin42cases
AT choijaehoon freeflapreconstructionofheadandneckdefectsafteroncologicablationonesurgeonsoutcomesin42cases
AT parksangwoo freeflapreconstructionofheadandneckdefectsafteroncologicablationonesurgeonsoutcomesin42cases