Cargando…

Usability testing of a monitoring and feedback tool to stimulate physical activity

INTRODUCTION: A monitoring and feedback tool to stimulate physical activity, consisting of an activity sensor, smartphone application (app), and website for patients and their practice nurses, has been developed: the ‘It’s LiFe!’ tool. In this study the usability of the tool was evaluated by technol...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: van der Weegen, Sanne, Verwey, Renée, Tange, Huibert J, Spreeuwenberg, Marieke D, de Witte, Luc P
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3962312/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24669188
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S57961
_version_ 1782308408771215360
author van der Weegen, Sanne
Verwey, Renée
Tange, Huibert J
Spreeuwenberg, Marieke D
de Witte, Luc P
author_facet van der Weegen, Sanne
Verwey, Renée
Tange, Huibert J
Spreeuwenberg, Marieke D
de Witte, Luc P
author_sort van der Weegen, Sanne
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: A monitoring and feedback tool to stimulate physical activity, consisting of an activity sensor, smartphone application (app), and website for patients and their practice nurses, has been developed: the ‘It’s LiFe!’ tool. In this study the usability of the tool was evaluated by technology experts and end users (people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease or type 2 diabetes, with ages from 40–70 years), to improve the user interfaces and content of the tool. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study had four phases: 1) a heuristic evaluation with six technology experts; 2) a usability test in a laboratory by five patients; 3) a pilot in real life wherein 20 patients used the tool for 3 months; and 4) a final lab test by five patients. In both lab tests (phases 2 and 4) qualitative data were collected through a thinking-aloud procedure and video recordings, and quantitative data through questions about task complexity, text comprehensiveness, and readability. In addition, the post-study system usability questionnaire (PSSUQ) was completed for the app and the website. In the pilot test (phase 3), all patients were interviewed three times and the Software Usability Measurement Inventory (SUMI) was completed. RESULTS: After each phase, improvements were made, mainly to the layout and text. The main improvement was a refresh button for active data synchronization between activity sensor, app, and server, implemented after connectivity problems in the pilot test. The mean score on the PSSUQ for the website improved from 5.6 (standard deviation [SD] 1.3) to 6.5 (SD 0.5), and for the app from 5.4 (SD 1.5) to 6.2 (SD 1.1). Satisfaction in the pilot was not very high according to the SUMI. DISCUSSION: The use of laboratory versus real-life tests and expert-based versus user-based tests revealed a wide range of usability issues. The usability of the It’s LiFe! tool improved considerably during the study.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3962312
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39623122014-03-25 Usability testing of a monitoring and feedback tool to stimulate physical activity van der Weegen, Sanne Verwey, Renée Tange, Huibert J Spreeuwenberg, Marieke D de Witte, Luc P Patient Prefer Adherence Original Research INTRODUCTION: A monitoring and feedback tool to stimulate physical activity, consisting of an activity sensor, smartphone application (app), and website for patients and their practice nurses, has been developed: the ‘It’s LiFe!’ tool. In this study the usability of the tool was evaluated by technology experts and end users (people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease or type 2 diabetes, with ages from 40–70 years), to improve the user interfaces and content of the tool. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study had four phases: 1) a heuristic evaluation with six technology experts; 2) a usability test in a laboratory by five patients; 3) a pilot in real life wherein 20 patients used the tool for 3 months; and 4) a final lab test by five patients. In both lab tests (phases 2 and 4) qualitative data were collected through a thinking-aloud procedure and video recordings, and quantitative data through questions about task complexity, text comprehensiveness, and readability. In addition, the post-study system usability questionnaire (PSSUQ) was completed for the app and the website. In the pilot test (phase 3), all patients were interviewed three times and the Software Usability Measurement Inventory (SUMI) was completed. RESULTS: After each phase, improvements were made, mainly to the layout and text. The main improvement was a refresh button for active data synchronization between activity sensor, app, and server, implemented after connectivity problems in the pilot test. The mean score on the PSSUQ for the website improved from 5.6 (standard deviation [SD] 1.3) to 6.5 (SD 0.5), and for the app from 5.4 (SD 1.5) to 6.2 (SD 1.1). Satisfaction in the pilot was not very high according to the SUMI. DISCUSSION: The use of laboratory versus real-life tests and expert-based versus user-based tests revealed a wide range of usability issues. The usability of the It’s LiFe! tool improved considerably during the study. Dove Medical Press 2014-03-17 /pmc/articles/PMC3962312/ /pubmed/24669188 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S57961 Text en © 2014 van der Weegen et al. This work is published by Dove Medical Press Limited, and licensed under Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License The full terms of the License are available at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed.
spellingShingle Original Research
van der Weegen, Sanne
Verwey, Renée
Tange, Huibert J
Spreeuwenberg, Marieke D
de Witte, Luc P
Usability testing of a monitoring and feedback tool to stimulate physical activity
title Usability testing of a monitoring and feedback tool to stimulate physical activity
title_full Usability testing of a monitoring and feedback tool to stimulate physical activity
title_fullStr Usability testing of a monitoring and feedback tool to stimulate physical activity
title_full_unstemmed Usability testing of a monitoring and feedback tool to stimulate physical activity
title_short Usability testing of a monitoring and feedback tool to stimulate physical activity
title_sort usability testing of a monitoring and feedback tool to stimulate physical activity
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3962312/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24669188
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S57961
work_keys_str_mv AT vanderweegensanne usabilitytestingofamonitoringandfeedbacktooltostimulatephysicalactivity
AT verweyrenee usabilitytestingofamonitoringandfeedbacktooltostimulatephysicalactivity
AT tangehuibertj usabilitytestingofamonitoringandfeedbacktooltostimulatephysicalactivity
AT spreeuwenbergmarieked usabilitytestingofamonitoringandfeedbacktooltostimulatephysicalactivity
AT dewittelucp usabilitytestingofamonitoringandfeedbacktooltostimulatephysicalactivity