Cargando…

Pregnancy Differentially Impacts Performance of Latent Tuberculosis Diagnostics in a High-Burden Setting

BACKGROUND: Targeted screening for latent TB infection (LTBI) in vulnerable populations is a recommended TB control strategy. Pregnant women are at high risk for developing TB and likely to access healthcare, making pregnancy an important screening opportunity in developing countries. The sensitivit...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mathad, Jyoti S., Bhosale, Ramesh, Sangar, Vikrant, Mave, Vidya, Gupte, Nikhil, Kanade, Savita, Nangude, Ashwini, Chopade, Kavita, Suryavanshi, Nishi, Deshpande, Prasad, Kulkarni, Vandana, Glesby, Marshall J., Fitzgerald, Daniel, Bharadwaj, Renu, Sambarey, Pradeep, Gupta, Amita
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3962385/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24658103
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0092308
_version_ 1782308425336619008
author Mathad, Jyoti S.
Bhosale, Ramesh
Sangar, Vikrant
Mave, Vidya
Gupte, Nikhil
Kanade, Savita
Nangude, Ashwini
Chopade, Kavita
Suryavanshi, Nishi
Deshpande, Prasad
Kulkarni, Vandana
Glesby, Marshall J.
Fitzgerald, Daniel
Bharadwaj, Renu
Sambarey, Pradeep
Gupta, Amita
author_facet Mathad, Jyoti S.
Bhosale, Ramesh
Sangar, Vikrant
Mave, Vidya
Gupte, Nikhil
Kanade, Savita
Nangude, Ashwini
Chopade, Kavita
Suryavanshi, Nishi
Deshpande, Prasad
Kulkarni, Vandana
Glesby, Marshall J.
Fitzgerald, Daniel
Bharadwaj, Renu
Sambarey, Pradeep
Gupta, Amita
author_sort Mathad, Jyoti S.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Targeted screening for latent TB infection (LTBI) in vulnerable populations is a recommended TB control strategy. Pregnant women are at high risk for developing TB and likely to access healthcare, making pregnancy an important screening opportunity in developing countries. The sensitivity of the widely-used tuberculin skin test (TST), however, may be reduced during pregnancy. METHODS: We performed a cross-sectional study comparing the TST with the QuantiFERON Gold In-tube (QGIT) in 401 HIV-negative women presenting antepartum (n = 154), at delivery (n = 148), or postpartum (n = 99) to a government hospital in Pune, India. A subset of 60 women enrolled during pregnancy was followed longitudinally and received both tests at all three stages of pregnancy. RESULTS: The QGIT returned significantly more positive results than the TST. Of the 401 women in the cross-sectional study, 150 (37%) had a positive QGIT, compared to 59 (14%) for the TST (p<0.005). Forty-nine (12%) did not have their TST read. Of 356 who had both results available, 46 (13%) were concordant positive, 91 (25%) were discordant (12 (3%) TST+/QGIT-; 79 (22%) TST−/QGIT+), and 206 (57%) concordant negative. Comparison by stage of pregnancy revealed that QGIT percent positivity remained stable between antepartum and delivery, unlike TST results (QGIT 31–32% vs TST 11–17%). Median IFN-γ concentration was lower at delivery than in antepartum or postpartum (1.66 vs 2.65 vs 8.99 IU/mL, p = 0.001). During postpartum, both tests had significantly increased positives (QGIT 31% vs 32% vs 52%, p = 0.01; TST 17% vs 11% vs 25%, p<0.005). The same trends were observed in the longitudinal subset. CONCLUSIONS: Timing and choice of LTBI test during pregnancy impact results. QGIT was more stable and more closely approximated the LTBI prevalence in India. But pregnancy stage clearly affects both tests, raising important questions about how the complex immune changes brought on by pregnancy may impact LTBI screening.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3962385
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39623852014-03-24 Pregnancy Differentially Impacts Performance of Latent Tuberculosis Diagnostics in a High-Burden Setting Mathad, Jyoti S. Bhosale, Ramesh Sangar, Vikrant Mave, Vidya Gupte, Nikhil Kanade, Savita Nangude, Ashwini Chopade, Kavita Suryavanshi, Nishi Deshpande, Prasad Kulkarni, Vandana Glesby, Marshall J. Fitzgerald, Daniel Bharadwaj, Renu Sambarey, Pradeep Gupta, Amita PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Targeted screening for latent TB infection (LTBI) in vulnerable populations is a recommended TB control strategy. Pregnant women are at high risk for developing TB and likely to access healthcare, making pregnancy an important screening opportunity in developing countries. The sensitivity of the widely-used tuberculin skin test (TST), however, may be reduced during pregnancy. METHODS: We performed a cross-sectional study comparing the TST with the QuantiFERON Gold In-tube (QGIT) in 401 HIV-negative women presenting antepartum (n = 154), at delivery (n = 148), or postpartum (n = 99) to a government hospital in Pune, India. A subset of 60 women enrolled during pregnancy was followed longitudinally and received both tests at all three stages of pregnancy. RESULTS: The QGIT returned significantly more positive results than the TST. Of the 401 women in the cross-sectional study, 150 (37%) had a positive QGIT, compared to 59 (14%) for the TST (p<0.005). Forty-nine (12%) did not have their TST read. Of 356 who had both results available, 46 (13%) were concordant positive, 91 (25%) were discordant (12 (3%) TST+/QGIT-; 79 (22%) TST−/QGIT+), and 206 (57%) concordant negative. Comparison by stage of pregnancy revealed that QGIT percent positivity remained stable between antepartum and delivery, unlike TST results (QGIT 31–32% vs TST 11–17%). Median IFN-γ concentration was lower at delivery than in antepartum or postpartum (1.66 vs 2.65 vs 8.99 IU/mL, p = 0.001). During postpartum, both tests had significantly increased positives (QGIT 31% vs 32% vs 52%, p = 0.01; TST 17% vs 11% vs 25%, p<0.005). The same trends were observed in the longitudinal subset. CONCLUSIONS: Timing and choice of LTBI test during pregnancy impact results. QGIT was more stable and more closely approximated the LTBI prevalence in India. But pregnancy stage clearly affects both tests, raising important questions about how the complex immune changes brought on by pregnancy may impact LTBI screening. Public Library of Science 2014-03-21 /pmc/articles/PMC3962385/ /pubmed/24658103 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0092308 Text en © 2014 Mathad et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Mathad, Jyoti S.
Bhosale, Ramesh
Sangar, Vikrant
Mave, Vidya
Gupte, Nikhil
Kanade, Savita
Nangude, Ashwini
Chopade, Kavita
Suryavanshi, Nishi
Deshpande, Prasad
Kulkarni, Vandana
Glesby, Marshall J.
Fitzgerald, Daniel
Bharadwaj, Renu
Sambarey, Pradeep
Gupta, Amita
Pregnancy Differentially Impacts Performance of Latent Tuberculosis Diagnostics in a High-Burden Setting
title Pregnancy Differentially Impacts Performance of Latent Tuberculosis Diagnostics in a High-Burden Setting
title_full Pregnancy Differentially Impacts Performance of Latent Tuberculosis Diagnostics in a High-Burden Setting
title_fullStr Pregnancy Differentially Impacts Performance of Latent Tuberculosis Diagnostics in a High-Burden Setting
title_full_unstemmed Pregnancy Differentially Impacts Performance of Latent Tuberculosis Diagnostics in a High-Burden Setting
title_short Pregnancy Differentially Impacts Performance of Latent Tuberculosis Diagnostics in a High-Burden Setting
title_sort pregnancy differentially impacts performance of latent tuberculosis diagnostics in a high-burden setting
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3962385/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24658103
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0092308
work_keys_str_mv AT mathadjyotis pregnancydifferentiallyimpactsperformanceoflatenttuberculosisdiagnosticsinahighburdensetting
AT bhosaleramesh pregnancydifferentiallyimpactsperformanceoflatenttuberculosisdiagnosticsinahighburdensetting
AT sangarvikrant pregnancydifferentiallyimpactsperformanceoflatenttuberculosisdiagnosticsinahighburdensetting
AT mavevidya pregnancydifferentiallyimpactsperformanceoflatenttuberculosisdiagnosticsinahighburdensetting
AT guptenikhil pregnancydifferentiallyimpactsperformanceoflatenttuberculosisdiagnosticsinahighburdensetting
AT kanadesavita pregnancydifferentiallyimpactsperformanceoflatenttuberculosisdiagnosticsinahighburdensetting
AT nangudeashwini pregnancydifferentiallyimpactsperformanceoflatenttuberculosisdiagnosticsinahighburdensetting
AT chopadekavita pregnancydifferentiallyimpactsperformanceoflatenttuberculosisdiagnosticsinahighburdensetting
AT suryavanshinishi pregnancydifferentiallyimpactsperformanceoflatenttuberculosisdiagnosticsinahighburdensetting
AT deshpandeprasad pregnancydifferentiallyimpactsperformanceoflatenttuberculosisdiagnosticsinahighburdensetting
AT kulkarnivandana pregnancydifferentiallyimpactsperformanceoflatenttuberculosisdiagnosticsinahighburdensetting
AT glesbymarshallj pregnancydifferentiallyimpactsperformanceoflatenttuberculosisdiagnosticsinahighburdensetting
AT fitzgeralddaniel pregnancydifferentiallyimpactsperformanceoflatenttuberculosisdiagnosticsinahighburdensetting
AT bharadwajrenu pregnancydifferentiallyimpactsperformanceoflatenttuberculosisdiagnosticsinahighburdensetting
AT sambareypradeep pregnancydifferentiallyimpactsperformanceoflatenttuberculosisdiagnosticsinahighburdensetting
AT guptaamita pregnancydifferentiallyimpactsperformanceoflatenttuberculosisdiagnosticsinahighburdensetting