Cargando…
Pregnancy Differentially Impacts Performance of Latent Tuberculosis Diagnostics in a High-Burden Setting
BACKGROUND: Targeted screening for latent TB infection (LTBI) in vulnerable populations is a recommended TB control strategy. Pregnant women are at high risk for developing TB and likely to access healthcare, making pregnancy an important screening opportunity in developing countries. The sensitivit...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3962385/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24658103 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0092308 |
_version_ | 1782308425336619008 |
---|---|
author | Mathad, Jyoti S. Bhosale, Ramesh Sangar, Vikrant Mave, Vidya Gupte, Nikhil Kanade, Savita Nangude, Ashwini Chopade, Kavita Suryavanshi, Nishi Deshpande, Prasad Kulkarni, Vandana Glesby, Marshall J. Fitzgerald, Daniel Bharadwaj, Renu Sambarey, Pradeep Gupta, Amita |
author_facet | Mathad, Jyoti S. Bhosale, Ramesh Sangar, Vikrant Mave, Vidya Gupte, Nikhil Kanade, Savita Nangude, Ashwini Chopade, Kavita Suryavanshi, Nishi Deshpande, Prasad Kulkarni, Vandana Glesby, Marshall J. Fitzgerald, Daniel Bharadwaj, Renu Sambarey, Pradeep Gupta, Amita |
author_sort | Mathad, Jyoti S. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Targeted screening for latent TB infection (LTBI) in vulnerable populations is a recommended TB control strategy. Pregnant women are at high risk for developing TB and likely to access healthcare, making pregnancy an important screening opportunity in developing countries. The sensitivity of the widely-used tuberculin skin test (TST), however, may be reduced during pregnancy. METHODS: We performed a cross-sectional study comparing the TST with the QuantiFERON Gold In-tube (QGIT) in 401 HIV-negative women presenting antepartum (n = 154), at delivery (n = 148), or postpartum (n = 99) to a government hospital in Pune, India. A subset of 60 women enrolled during pregnancy was followed longitudinally and received both tests at all three stages of pregnancy. RESULTS: The QGIT returned significantly more positive results than the TST. Of the 401 women in the cross-sectional study, 150 (37%) had a positive QGIT, compared to 59 (14%) for the TST (p<0.005). Forty-nine (12%) did not have their TST read. Of 356 who had both results available, 46 (13%) were concordant positive, 91 (25%) were discordant (12 (3%) TST+/QGIT-; 79 (22%) TST−/QGIT+), and 206 (57%) concordant negative. Comparison by stage of pregnancy revealed that QGIT percent positivity remained stable between antepartum and delivery, unlike TST results (QGIT 31–32% vs TST 11–17%). Median IFN-γ concentration was lower at delivery than in antepartum or postpartum (1.66 vs 2.65 vs 8.99 IU/mL, p = 0.001). During postpartum, both tests had significantly increased positives (QGIT 31% vs 32% vs 52%, p = 0.01; TST 17% vs 11% vs 25%, p<0.005). The same trends were observed in the longitudinal subset. CONCLUSIONS: Timing and choice of LTBI test during pregnancy impact results. QGIT was more stable and more closely approximated the LTBI prevalence in India. But pregnancy stage clearly affects both tests, raising important questions about how the complex immune changes brought on by pregnancy may impact LTBI screening. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3962385 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-39623852014-03-24 Pregnancy Differentially Impacts Performance of Latent Tuberculosis Diagnostics in a High-Burden Setting Mathad, Jyoti S. Bhosale, Ramesh Sangar, Vikrant Mave, Vidya Gupte, Nikhil Kanade, Savita Nangude, Ashwini Chopade, Kavita Suryavanshi, Nishi Deshpande, Prasad Kulkarni, Vandana Glesby, Marshall J. Fitzgerald, Daniel Bharadwaj, Renu Sambarey, Pradeep Gupta, Amita PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Targeted screening for latent TB infection (LTBI) in vulnerable populations is a recommended TB control strategy. Pregnant women are at high risk for developing TB and likely to access healthcare, making pregnancy an important screening opportunity in developing countries. The sensitivity of the widely-used tuberculin skin test (TST), however, may be reduced during pregnancy. METHODS: We performed a cross-sectional study comparing the TST with the QuantiFERON Gold In-tube (QGIT) in 401 HIV-negative women presenting antepartum (n = 154), at delivery (n = 148), or postpartum (n = 99) to a government hospital in Pune, India. A subset of 60 women enrolled during pregnancy was followed longitudinally and received both tests at all three stages of pregnancy. RESULTS: The QGIT returned significantly more positive results than the TST. Of the 401 women in the cross-sectional study, 150 (37%) had a positive QGIT, compared to 59 (14%) for the TST (p<0.005). Forty-nine (12%) did not have their TST read. Of 356 who had both results available, 46 (13%) were concordant positive, 91 (25%) were discordant (12 (3%) TST+/QGIT-; 79 (22%) TST−/QGIT+), and 206 (57%) concordant negative. Comparison by stage of pregnancy revealed that QGIT percent positivity remained stable between antepartum and delivery, unlike TST results (QGIT 31–32% vs TST 11–17%). Median IFN-γ concentration was lower at delivery than in antepartum or postpartum (1.66 vs 2.65 vs 8.99 IU/mL, p = 0.001). During postpartum, both tests had significantly increased positives (QGIT 31% vs 32% vs 52%, p = 0.01; TST 17% vs 11% vs 25%, p<0.005). The same trends were observed in the longitudinal subset. CONCLUSIONS: Timing and choice of LTBI test during pregnancy impact results. QGIT was more stable and more closely approximated the LTBI prevalence in India. But pregnancy stage clearly affects both tests, raising important questions about how the complex immune changes brought on by pregnancy may impact LTBI screening. Public Library of Science 2014-03-21 /pmc/articles/PMC3962385/ /pubmed/24658103 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0092308 Text en © 2014 Mathad et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Mathad, Jyoti S. Bhosale, Ramesh Sangar, Vikrant Mave, Vidya Gupte, Nikhil Kanade, Savita Nangude, Ashwini Chopade, Kavita Suryavanshi, Nishi Deshpande, Prasad Kulkarni, Vandana Glesby, Marshall J. Fitzgerald, Daniel Bharadwaj, Renu Sambarey, Pradeep Gupta, Amita Pregnancy Differentially Impacts Performance of Latent Tuberculosis Diagnostics in a High-Burden Setting |
title | Pregnancy Differentially Impacts Performance of Latent Tuberculosis Diagnostics in a High-Burden Setting |
title_full | Pregnancy Differentially Impacts Performance of Latent Tuberculosis Diagnostics in a High-Burden Setting |
title_fullStr | Pregnancy Differentially Impacts Performance of Latent Tuberculosis Diagnostics in a High-Burden Setting |
title_full_unstemmed | Pregnancy Differentially Impacts Performance of Latent Tuberculosis Diagnostics in a High-Burden Setting |
title_short | Pregnancy Differentially Impacts Performance of Latent Tuberculosis Diagnostics in a High-Burden Setting |
title_sort | pregnancy differentially impacts performance of latent tuberculosis diagnostics in a high-burden setting |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3962385/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24658103 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0092308 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mathadjyotis pregnancydifferentiallyimpactsperformanceoflatenttuberculosisdiagnosticsinahighburdensetting AT bhosaleramesh pregnancydifferentiallyimpactsperformanceoflatenttuberculosisdiagnosticsinahighburdensetting AT sangarvikrant pregnancydifferentiallyimpactsperformanceoflatenttuberculosisdiagnosticsinahighburdensetting AT mavevidya pregnancydifferentiallyimpactsperformanceoflatenttuberculosisdiagnosticsinahighburdensetting AT guptenikhil pregnancydifferentiallyimpactsperformanceoflatenttuberculosisdiagnosticsinahighburdensetting AT kanadesavita pregnancydifferentiallyimpactsperformanceoflatenttuberculosisdiagnosticsinahighburdensetting AT nangudeashwini pregnancydifferentiallyimpactsperformanceoflatenttuberculosisdiagnosticsinahighburdensetting AT chopadekavita pregnancydifferentiallyimpactsperformanceoflatenttuberculosisdiagnosticsinahighburdensetting AT suryavanshinishi pregnancydifferentiallyimpactsperformanceoflatenttuberculosisdiagnosticsinahighburdensetting AT deshpandeprasad pregnancydifferentiallyimpactsperformanceoflatenttuberculosisdiagnosticsinahighburdensetting AT kulkarnivandana pregnancydifferentiallyimpactsperformanceoflatenttuberculosisdiagnosticsinahighburdensetting AT glesbymarshallj pregnancydifferentiallyimpactsperformanceoflatenttuberculosisdiagnosticsinahighburdensetting AT fitzgeralddaniel pregnancydifferentiallyimpactsperformanceoflatenttuberculosisdiagnosticsinahighburdensetting AT bharadwajrenu pregnancydifferentiallyimpactsperformanceoflatenttuberculosisdiagnosticsinahighburdensetting AT sambareypradeep pregnancydifferentiallyimpactsperformanceoflatenttuberculosisdiagnosticsinahighburdensetting AT guptaamita pregnancydifferentiallyimpactsperformanceoflatenttuberculosisdiagnosticsinahighburdensetting |