Cargando…

An educational approach to improve outcomes in acute kidney injury (AKI): report of a quality improvement project

OBJECTIVE: To assess the impact of a quality improvement project that used a multifaceted educational intervention on how to improve clinician's knowledge, confidence and awareness of acute kidney injury (AKI). SETTING: 2 large acute teaching hospitals in England, serving a combined population...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Xu, Gang, Baines, Richard, Westacott, Rachel, Selby, Nick, Carr, Susan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3963099/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24650804
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2013-004388
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVE: To assess the impact of a quality improvement project that used a multifaceted educational intervention on how to improve clinician's knowledge, confidence and awareness of acute kidney injury (AKI). SETTING: 2 large acute teaching hospitals in England, serving a combined population of over 1.5 million people. PARTICIPANTS: All secondary care clinicians working in the clinical areas were targeted, with a specific focus on clinicians working in acute admission areas. INTERVENTIONS: A multifaceted educational intervention consisting of traditional didactic lectures, case-based teaching in small groups and an interactive web-based learning resource. OUTCOME MEASURES: We assessed clinicians’ knowledge of AKI and their self-reported clinical behaviour using an interactive questionnaire before and after the educational intervention. Secondary outcome measures included clinical audit of patient notes before and after the intervention. RESULTS: 26% of clinicians reported that they were aware of local AKI guidelines in the preintervention questionnaire compared to 64% in the follow-up questionnaire (χ²=60.2, p<0.001). There was an improvement in the number of clinicians reporting satisfactory practice when diagnosing AKI, 50% vs 68% (χ²=12.1, p<0.001) and investigating patients with AKI, 48% vs 64% (χ²=9.5, p=0.002). Clinical audit makers showed a trend towards better clinical practice. CONCLUSIONS: This quality improvement project utilising a multifaceted educational intervention improved awareness of AKI as demonstrated by changes in the clinician's self-reported management of patients with AKI. Elements of the project have been sustained beyond the project period, and demonstrate the power of quality improvement projects to help initiate changes in practice. Our findings are limited by confounding factors and highlight the need to carry out formal randomised studies to determine the impact of educational initiatives in the clinical setting.