Cargando…
A Retrospective Case-Control Study Evaluating the Bowel Preparation Quality during Surveillance Colonoscopy after Colonic Resection
Purpose. Bowel preparation for surveillance endoscopy following surgery can be impaired by suboptimal bowel function. Our study compares two groups of patients in order to evaluate the influence of colorectal resection on bowel preparation. Methods. From April 2010 to December 2011, 351 patients wer...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3963188/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24729880 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/681978 |
_version_ | 1782308479857328128 |
---|---|
author | Pontone, Stefano Leonetti, Giovanni Lamazza, Antonietta Fiocca, Fausto Filippini, Angelo Fanello, Gianfranco Cereatti, Fabrizio Fiori, Enrico Angelini, Rita Patrizi, Gregorio Brighi, Manuela Vetere, Simone Antoniozzi, Angelo Pironi, Daniele Manfredelli, Simone Pontone, Paolo |
author_facet | Pontone, Stefano Leonetti, Giovanni Lamazza, Antonietta Fiocca, Fausto Filippini, Angelo Fanello, Gianfranco Cereatti, Fabrizio Fiori, Enrico Angelini, Rita Patrizi, Gregorio Brighi, Manuela Vetere, Simone Antoniozzi, Angelo Pironi, Daniele Manfredelli, Simone Pontone, Paolo |
author_sort | Pontone, Stefano |
collection | PubMed |
description | Purpose. Bowel preparation for surveillance endoscopy following surgery can be impaired by suboptimal bowel function. Our study compares two groups of patients in order to evaluate the influence of colorectal resection on bowel preparation. Methods. From April 2010 to December 2011, 351 patients were enrolled in our retrospective study and divided into two homogeneous arms: resection group (RG) and control group. Surgical methods were classified as left hemicolectomy, right hemicolectomy, anterior rectal resection, and double colonic resection. Bowel cleansing was evaluated by nine skilled endoscopists using the Aronchick scale. Results. Among the 161 patients of the RG, surgery was as follows: 60 left hemicolectomies (37%), 62 right hemicolectomies (38%), and 33 anterior rectal resections (20%). Unsatisfactory bowel preparation was significantly higher in resected population (44% versus 12%; P value = 0.000). No significant difference (38% versus 31%, P value = ns) was detected in the intermediate score, which represents a fair quality of bowel preparation. Conclusions. Our study highlights how patients with previous colonic resection are at high risk for a worse bowel preparation. Currently, the intestinal cleansing carried out by 4 L PEG based preparation does not seem to be sufficient to achieve the quality parameters required for the post-resection endoscopic monitoring. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3963188 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Hindawi Publishing Corporation |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-39631882014-04-13 A Retrospective Case-Control Study Evaluating the Bowel Preparation Quality during Surveillance Colonoscopy after Colonic Resection Pontone, Stefano Leonetti, Giovanni Lamazza, Antonietta Fiocca, Fausto Filippini, Angelo Fanello, Gianfranco Cereatti, Fabrizio Fiori, Enrico Angelini, Rita Patrizi, Gregorio Brighi, Manuela Vetere, Simone Antoniozzi, Angelo Pironi, Daniele Manfredelli, Simone Pontone, Paolo ISRN Gastroenterol Clinical Study Purpose. Bowel preparation for surveillance endoscopy following surgery can be impaired by suboptimal bowel function. Our study compares two groups of patients in order to evaluate the influence of colorectal resection on bowel preparation. Methods. From April 2010 to December 2011, 351 patients were enrolled in our retrospective study and divided into two homogeneous arms: resection group (RG) and control group. Surgical methods were classified as left hemicolectomy, right hemicolectomy, anterior rectal resection, and double colonic resection. Bowel cleansing was evaluated by nine skilled endoscopists using the Aronchick scale. Results. Among the 161 patients of the RG, surgery was as follows: 60 left hemicolectomies (37%), 62 right hemicolectomies (38%), and 33 anterior rectal resections (20%). Unsatisfactory bowel preparation was significantly higher in resected population (44% versus 12%; P value = 0.000). No significant difference (38% versus 31%, P value = ns) was detected in the intermediate score, which represents a fair quality of bowel preparation. Conclusions. Our study highlights how patients with previous colonic resection are at high risk for a worse bowel preparation. Currently, the intestinal cleansing carried out by 4 L PEG based preparation does not seem to be sufficient to achieve the quality parameters required for the post-resection endoscopic monitoring. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2014-03-06 /pmc/articles/PMC3963188/ /pubmed/24729880 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/681978 Text en Copyright © 2014 Stefano Pontone et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Clinical Study Pontone, Stefano Leonetti, Giovanni Lamazza, Antonietta Fiocca, Fausto Filippini, Angelo Fanello, Gianfranco Cereatti, Fabrizio Fiori, Enrico Angelini, Rita Patrizi, Gregorio Brighi, Manuela Vetere, Simone Antoniozzi, Angelo Pironi, Daniele Manfredelli, Simone Pontone, Paolo A Retrospective Case-Control Study Evaluating the Bowel Preparation Quality during Surveillance Colonoscopy after Colonic Resection |
title | A Retrospective Case-Control Study Evaluating the Bowel Preparation Quality during Surveillance Colonoscopy after Colonic Resection |
title_full | A Retrospective Case-Control Study Evaluating the Bowel Preparation Quality during Surveillance Colonoscopy after Colonic Resection |
title_fullStr | A Retrospective Case-Control Study Evaluating the Bowel Preparation Quality during Surveillance Colonoscopy after Colonic Resection |
title_full_unstemmed | A Retrospective Case-Control Study Evaluating the Bowel Preparation Quality during Surveillance Colonoscopy after Colonic Resection |
title_short | A Retrospective Case-Control Study Evaluating the Bowel Preparation Quality during Surveillance Colonoscopy after Colonic Resection |
title_sort | retrospective case-control study evaluating the bowel preparation quality during surveillance colonoscopy after colonic resection |
topic | Clinical Study |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3963188/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24729880 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/681978 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT pontonestefano aretrospectivecasecontrolstudyevaluatingthebowelpreparationqualityduringsurveillancecolonoscopyaftercolonicresection AT leonettigiovanni aretrospectivecasecontrolstudyevaluatingthebowelpreparationqualityduringsurveillancecolonoscopyaftercolonicresection AT lamazzaantonietta aretrospectivecasecontrolstudyevaluatingthebowelpreparationqualityduringsurveillancecolonoscopyaftercolonicresection AT fioccafausto aretrospectivecasecontrolstudyevaluatingthebowelpreparationqualityduringsurveillancecolonoscopyaftercolonicresection AT filippiniangelo aretrospectivecasecontrolstudyevaluatingthebowelpreparationqualityduringsurveillancecolonoscopyaftercolonicresection AT fanellogianfranco aretrospectivecasecontrolstudyevaluatingthebowelpreparationqualityduringsurveillancecolonoscopyaftercolonicresection AT cereattifabrizio aretrospectivecasecontrolstudyevaluatingthebowelpreparationqualityduringsurveillancecolonoscopyaftercolonicresection AT fiorienrico aretrospectivecasecontrolstudyevaluatingthebowelpreparationqualityduringsurveillancecolonoscopyaftercolonicresection AT angelinirita aretrospectivecasecontrolstudyevaluatingthebowelpreparationqualityduringsurveillancecolonoscopyaftercolonicresection AT patrizigregorio aretrospectivecasecontrolstudyevaluatingthebowelpreparationqualityduringsurveillancecolonoscopyaftercolonicresection AT brighimanuela aretrospectivecasecontrolstudyevaluatingthebowelpreparationqualityduringsurveillancecolonoscopyaftercolonicresection AT veteresimone aretrospectivecasecontrolstudyevaluatingthebowelpreparationqualityduringsurveillancecolonoscopyaftercolonicresection AT antoniozziangelo aretrospectivecasecontrolstudyevaluatingthebowelpreparationqualityduringsurveillancecolonoscopyaftercolonicresection AT pironidaniele aretrospectivecasecontrolstudyevaluatingthebowelpreparationqualityduringsurveillancecolonoscopyaftercolonicresection AT manfredellisimone aretrospectivecasecontrolstudyevaluatingthebowelpreparationqualityduringsurveillancecolonoscopyaftercolonicresection AT pontonepaolo aretrospectivecasecontrolstudyevaluatingthebowelpreparationqualityduringsurveillancecolonoscopyaftercolonicresection AT pontonestefano retrospectivecasecontrolstudyevaluatingthebowelpreparationqualityduringsurveillancecolonoscopyaftercolonicresection AT leonettigiovanni retrospectivecasecontrolstudyevaluatingthebowelpreparationqualityduringsurveillancecolonoscopyaftercolonicresection AT lamazzaantonietta retrospectivecasecontrolstudyevaluatingthebowelpreparationqualityduringsurveillancecolonoscopyaftercolonicresection AT fioccafausto retrospectivecasecontrolstudyevaluatingthebowelpreparationqualityduringsurveillancecolonoscopyaftercolonicresection AT filippiniangelo retrospectivecasecontrolstudyevaluatingthebowelpreparationqualityduringsurveillancecolonoscopyaftercolonicresection AT fanellogianfranco retrospectivecasecontrolstudyevaluatingthebowelpreparationqualityduringsurveillancecolonoscopyaftercolonicresection AT cereattifabrizio retrospectivecasecontrolstudyevaluatingthebowelpreparationqualityduringsurveillancecolonoscopyaftercolonicresection AT fiorienrico retrospectivecasecontrolstudyevaluatingthebowelpreparationqualityduringsurveillancecolonoscopyaftercolonicresection AT angelinirita retrospectivecasecontrolstudyevaluatingthebowelpreparationqualityduringsurveillancecolonoscopyaftercolonicresection AT patrizigregorio retrospectivecasecontrolstudyevaluatingthebowelpreparationqualityduringsurveillancecolonoscopyaftercolonicresection AT brighimanuela retrospectivecasecontrolstudyevaluatingthebowelpreparationqualityduringsurveillancecolonoscopyaftercolonicresection AT veteresimone retrospectivecasecontrolstudyevaluatingthebowelpreparationqualityduringsurveillancecolonoscopyaftercolonicresection AT antoniozziangelo retrospectivecasecontrolstudyevaluatingthebowelpreparationqualityduringsurveillancecolonoscopyaftercolonicresection AT pironidaniele retrospectivecasecontrolstudyevaluatingthebowelpreparationqualityduringsurveillancecolonoscopyaftercolonicresection AT manfredellisimone retrospectivecasecontrolstudyevaluatingthebowelpreparationqualityduringsurveillancecolonoscopyaftercolonicresection AT pontonepaolo retrospectivecasecontrolstudyevaluatingthebowelpreparationqualityduringsurveillancecolonoscopyaftercolonicresection |