Cargando…

A Retrospective Case-Control Study Evaluating the Bowel Preparation Quality during Surveillance Colonoscopy after Colonic Resection

Purpose. Bowel preparation for surveillance endoscopy following surgery can be impaired by suboptimal bowel function. Our study compares two groups of patients in order to evaluate the influence of colorectal resection on bowel preparation. Methods. From April 2010 to December 2011, 351 patients wer...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pontone, Stefano, Leonetti, Giovanni, Lamazza, Antonietta, Fiocca, Fausto, Filippini, Angelo, Fanello, Gianfranco, Cereatti, Fabrizio, Fiori, Enrico, Angelini, Rita, Patrizi, Gregorio, Brighi, Manuela, Vetere, Simone, Antoniozzi, Angelo, Pironi, Daniele, Manfredelli, Simone, Pontone, Paolo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3963188/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24729880
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/681978
_version_ 1782308479857328128
author Pontone, Stefano
Leonetti, Giovanni
Lamazza, Antonietta
Fiocca, Fausto
Filippini, Angelo
Fanello, Gianfranco
Cereatti, Fabrizio
Fiori, Enrico
Angelini, Rita
Patrizi, Gregorio
Brighi, Manuela
Vetere, Simone
Antoniozzi, Angelo
Pironi, Daniele
Manfredelli, Simone
Pontone, Paolo
author_facet Pontone, Stefano
Leonetti, Giovanni
Lamazza, Antonietta
Fiocca, Fausto
Filippini, Angelo
Fanello, Gianfranco
Cereatti, Fabrizio
Fiori, Enrico
Angelini, Rita
Patrizi, Gregorio
Brighi, Manuela
Vetere, Simone
Antoniozzi, Angelo
Pironi, Daniele
Manfredelli, Simone
Pontone, Paolo
author_sort Pontone, Stefano
collection PubMed
description Purpose. Bowel preparation for surveillance endoscopy following surgery can be impaired by suboptimal bowel function. Our study compares two groups of patients in order to evaluate the influence of colorectal resection on bowel preparation. Methods. From April 2010 to December 2011, 351 patients were enrolled in our retrospective study and divided into two homogeneous arms: resection group (RG) and control group. Surgical methods were classified as left hemicolectomy, right hemicolectomy, anterior rectal resection, and double colonic resection. Bowel cleansing was evaluated by nine skilled endoscopists using the Aronchick scale. Results. Among the 161 patients of the RG, surgery was as follows: 60 left hemicolectomies (37%), 62 right hemicolectomies (38%), and 33 anterior rectal resections (20%). Unsatisfactory bowel preparation was significantly higher in resected population (44% versus 12%; P value = 0.000). No significant difference (38% versus 31%, P value = ns) was detected in the intermediate score, which represents a fair quality of bowel preparation. Conclusions. Our study highlights how patients with previous colonic resection are at high risk for a worse bowel preparation. Currently, the intestinal cleansing carried out by 4 L PEG based preparation does not seem to be sufficient to achieve the quality parameters required for the post-resection endoscopic monitoring.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3963188
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39631882014-04-13 A Retrospective Case-Control Study Evaluating the Bowel Preparation Quality during Surveillance Colonoscopy after Colonic Resection Pontone, Stefano Leonetti, Giovanni Lamazza, Antonietta Fiocca, Fausto Filippini, Angelo Fanello, Gianfranco Cereatti, Fabrizio Fiori, Enrico Angelini, Rita Patrizi, Gregorio Brighi, Manuela Vetere, Simone Antoniozzi, Angelo Pironi, Daniele Manfredelli, Simone Pontone, Paolo ISRN Gastroenterol Clinical Study Purpose. Bowel preparation for surveillance endoscopy following surgery can be impaired by suboptimal bowel function. Our study compares two groups of patients in order to evaluate the influence of colorectal resection on bowel preparation. Methods. From April 2010 to December 2011, 351 patients were enrolled in our retrospective study and divided into two homogeneous arms: resection group (RG) and control group. Surgical methods were classified as left hemicolectomy, right hemicolectomy, anterior rectal resection, and double colonic resection. Bowel cleansing was evaluated by nine skilled endoscopists using the Aronchick scale. Results. Among the 161 patients of the RG, surgery was as follows: 60 left hemicolectomies (37%), 62 right hemicolectomies (38%), and 33 anterior rectal resections (20%). Unsatisfactory bowel preparation was significantly higher in resected population (44% versus 12%; P value = 0.000). No significant difference (38% versus 31%, P value = ns) was detected in the intermediate score, which represents a fair quality of bowel preparation. Conclusions. Our study highlights how patients with previous colonic resection are at high risk for a worse bowel preparation. Currently, the intestinal cleansing carried out by 4 L PEG based preparation does not seem to be sufficient to achieve the quality parameters required for the post-resection endoscopic monitoring. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2014-03-06 /pmc/articles/PMC3963188/ /pubmed/24729880 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/681978 Text en Copyright © 2014 Stefano Pontone et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Clinical Study
Pontone, Stefano
Leonetti, Giovanni
Lamazza, Antonietta
Fiocca, Fausto
Filippini, Angelo
Fanello, Gianfranco
Cereatti, Fabrizio
Fiori, Enrico
Angelini, Rita
Patrizi, Gregorio
Brighi, Manuela
Vetere, Simone
Antoniozzi, Angelo
Pironi, Daniele
Manfredelli, Simone
Pontone, Paolo
A Retrospective Case-Control Study Evaluating the Bowel Preparation Quality during Surveillance Colonoscopy after Colonic Resection
title A Retrospective Case-Control Study Evaluating the Bowel Preparation Quality during Surveillance Colonoscopy after Colonic Resection
title_full A Retrospective Case-Control Study Evaluating the Bowel Preparation Quality during Surveillance Colonoscopy after Colonic Resection
title_fullStr A Retrospective Case-Control Study Evaluating the Bowel Preparation Quality during Surveillance Colonoscopy after Colonic Resection
title_full_unstemmed A Retrospective Case-Control Study Evaluating the Bowel Preparation Quality during Surveillance Colonoscopy after Colonic Resection
title_short A Retrospective Case-Control Study Evaluating the Bowel Preparation Quality during Surveillance Colonoscopy after Colonic Resection
title_sort retrospective case-control study evaluating the bowel preparation quality during surveillance colonoscopy after colonic resection
topic Clinical Study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3963188/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24729880
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/681978
work_keys_str_mv AT pontonestefano aretrospectivecasecontrolstudyevaluatingthebowelpreparationqualityduringsurveillancecolonoscopyaftercolonicresection
AT leonettigiovanni aretrospectivecasecontrolstudyevaluatingthebowelpreparationqualityduringsurveillancecolonoscopyaftercolonicresection
AT lamazzaantonietta aretrospectivecasecontrolstudyevaluatingthebowelpreparationqualityduringsurveillancecolonoscopyaftercolonicresection
AT fioccafausto aretrospectivecasecontrolstudyevaluatingthebowelpreparationqualityduringsurveillancecolonoscopyaftercolonicresection
AT filippiniangelo aretrospectivecasecontrolstudyevaluatingthebowelpreparationqualityduringsurveillancecolonoscopyaftercolonicresection
AT fanellogianfranco aretrospectivecasecontrolstudyevaluatingthebowelpreparationqualityduringsurveillancecolonoscopyaftercolonicresection
AT cereattifabrizio aretrospectivecasecontrolstudyevaluatingthebowelpreparationqualityduringsurveillancecolonoscopyaftercolonicresection
AT fiorienrico aretrospectivecasecontrolstudyevaluatingthebowelpreparationqualityduringsurveillancecolonoscopyaftercolonicresection
AT angelinirita aretrospectivecasecontrolstudyevaluatingthebowelpreparationqualityduringsurveillancecolonoscopyaftercolonicresection
AT patrizigregorio aretrospectivecasecontrolstudyevaluatingthebowelpreparationqualityduringsurveillancecolonoscopyaftercolonicresection
AT brighimanuela aretrospectivecasecontrolstudyevaluatingthebowelpreparationqualityduringsurveillancecolonoscopyaftercolonicresection
AT veteresimone aretrospectivecasecontrolstudyevaluatingthebowelpreparationqualityduringsurveillancecolonoscopyaftercolonicresection
AT antoniozziangelo aretrospectivecasecontrolstudyevaluatingthebowelpreparationqualityduringsurveillancecolonoscopyaftercolonicresection
AT pironidaniele aretrospectivecasecontrolstudyevaluatingthebowelpreparationqualityduringsurveillancecolonoscopyaftercolonicresection
AT manfredellisimone aretrospectivecasecontrolstudyevaluatingthebowelpreparationqualityduringsurveillancecolonoscopyaftercolonicresection
AT pontonepaolo aretrospectivecasecontrolstudyevaluatingthebowelpreparationqualityduringsurveillancecolonoscopyaftercolonicresection
AT pontonestefano retrospectivecasecontrolstudyevaluatingthebowelpreparationqualityduringsurveillancecolonoscopyaftercolonicresection
AT leonettigiovanni retrospectivecasecontrolstudyevaluatingthebowelpreparationqualityduringsurveillancecolonoscopyaftercolonicresection
AT lamazzaantonietta retrospectivecasecontrolstudyevaluatingthebowelpreparationqualityduringsurveillancecolonoscopyaftercolonicresection
AT fioccafausto retrospectivecasecontrolstudyevaluatingthebowelpreparationqualityduringsurveillancecolonoscopyaftercolonicresection
AT filippiniangelo retrospectivecasecontrolstudyevaluatingthebowelpreparationqualityduringsurveillancecolonoscopyaftercolonicresection
AT fanellogianfranco retrospectivecasecontrolstudyevaluatingthebowelpreparationqualityduringsurveillancecolonoscopyaftercolonicresection
AT cereattifabrizio retrospectivecasecontrolstudyevaluatingthebowelpreparationqualityduringsurveillancecolonoscopyaftercolonicresection
AT fiorienrico retrospectivecasecontrolstudyevaluatingthebowelpreparationqualityduringsurveillancecolonoscopyaftercolonicresection
AT angelinirita retrospectivecasecontrolstudyevaluatingthebowelpreparationqualityduringsurveillancecolonoscopyaftercolonicresection
AT patrizigregorio retrospectivecasecontrolstudyevaluatingthebowelpreparationqualityduringsurveillancecolonoscopyaftercolonicresection
AT brighimanuela retrospectivecasecontrolstudyevaluatingthebowelpreparationqualityduringsurveillancecolonoscopyaftercolonicresection
AT veteresimone retrospectivecasecontrolstudyevaluatingthebowelpreparationqualityduringsurveillancecolonoscopyaftercolonicresection
AT antoniozziangelo retrospectivecasecontrolstudyevaluatingthebowelpreparationqualityduringsurveillancecolonoscopyaftercolonicresection
AT pironidaniele retrospectivecasecontrolstudyevaluatingthebowelpreparationqualityduringsurveillancecolonoscopyaftercolonicresection
AT manfredellisimone retrospectivecasecontrolstudyevaluatingthebowelpreparationqualityduringsurveillancecolonoscopyaftercolonicresection
AT pontonepaolo retrospectivecasecontrolstudyevaluatingthebowelpreparationqualityduringsurveillancecolonoscopyaftercolonicresection