Cargando…
Critical care 24 × 7: But, why is critical nutrition interrupted?
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Adequate nutritional support is crucial in prevention and treatment of malnutrition in critically ill-patients. Despite the intention to provide appropriate enteral nutrition (EN), meeting the full nutritional requirements can be a challenge due to interruptions. This study was...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3963197/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24701064 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-5229.128704 |
_version_ | 1782308481822359552 |
---|---|
author | Ramakrishnan, Nagarajan Daphnee, D. K. Ranganathan, Lakshmi Bhuvaneshwari, S. |
author_facet | Ramakrishnan, Nagarajan Daphnee, D. K. Ranganathan, Lakshmi Bhuvaneshwari, S. |
author_sort | Ramakrishnan, Nagarajan |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Adequate nutritional support is crucial in prevention and treatment of malnutrition in critically ill-patients. Despite the intention to provide appropriate enteral nutrition (EN), meeting the full nutritional requirements can be a challenge due to interruptions. This study was undertaken to determine the cause and duration of interruptions in EN. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients admitted to a multidisciplinary critical care unit (CCU) of a tertiary care hospital from September 2010 to January 2011 and who received EN for a period >24 h were included in this observational, prospective study. A total of 327 patients were included, for a total of 857 patient-days. Reasons and duration of EN interruptions were recorded and categorized under four groups-procedures inside CCU, procedures outside CCU, gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms and others. RESULTS: Procedure inside CCU accounted for 55.9% of the interruptions while GI symptoms for 24.2%. Although it is commonly perceived that procedures outside CCU are the most common reason for interruption, this contributed only to 18.4% individually; ventilation-related procedures were the most frequent cause (40.25%), followed by nasogastric tube aspirations (15.28%). Although GI bleed is often considered a reason to hold enteral feed, it was one of the least common reasons (1%) in our study. Interruption of 2-6 h was more frequent (43%) and most of this (67.1%) was related to “procedures inside CCU”. CONCLUSION: Awareness of reasons for EN interruptions will aid to modify protocol and minimize interruptions during procedures in CCU to reach nutrition goals. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3963197 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-39631972014-04-03 Critical care 24 × 7: But, why is critical nutrition interrupted? Ramakrishnan, Nagarajan Daphnee, D. K. Ranganathan, Lakshmi Bhuvaneshwari, S. Indian J Crit Care Med Research Article BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Adequate nutritional support is crucial in prevention and treatment of malnutrition in critically ill-patients. Despite the intention to provide appropriate enteral nutrition (EN), meeting the full nutritional requirements can be a challenge due to interruptions. This study was undertaken to determine the cause and duration of interruptions in EN. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients admitted to a multidisciplinary critical care unit (CCU) of a tertiary care hospital from September 2010 to January 2011 and who received EN for a period >24 h were included in this observational, prospective study. A total of 327 patients were included, for a total of 857 patient-days. Reasons and duration of EN interruptions were recorded and categorized under four groups-procedures inside CCU, procedures outside CCU, gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms and others. RESULTS: Procedure inside CCU accounted for 55.9% of the interruptions while GI symptoms for 24.2%. Although it is commonly perceived that procedures outside CCU are the most common reason for interruption, this contributed only to 18.4% individually; ventilation-related procedures were the most frequent cause (40.25%), followed by nasogastric tube aspirations (15.28%). Although GI bleed is often considered a reason to hold enteral feed, it was one of the least common reasons (1%) in our study. Interruption of 2-6 h was more frequent (43%) and most of this (67.1%) was related to “procedures inside CCU”. CONCLUSION: Awareness of reasons for EN interruptions will aid to modify protocol and minimize interruptions during procedures in CCU to reach nutrition goals. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2014-03 /pmc/articles/PMC3963197/ /pubmed/24701064 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-5229.128704 Text en Copyright: © Indian Journal of Critical Care Medicine http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Ramakrishnan, Nagarajan Daphnee, D. K. Ranganathan, Lakshmi Bhuvaneshwari, S. Critical care 24 × 7: But, why is critical nutrition interrupted? |
title | Critical care 24 × 7: But, why is critical nutrition interrupted? |
title_full | Critical care 24 × 7: But, why is critical nutrition interrupted? |
title_fullStr | Critical care 24 × 7: But, why is critical nutrition interrupted? |
title_full_unstemmed | Critical care 24 × 7: But, why is critical nutrition interrupted? |
title_short | Critical care 24 × 7: But, why is critical nutrition interrupted? |
title_sort | critical care 24 × 7: but, why is critical nutrition interrupted? |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3963197/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24701064 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-5229.128704 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ramakrishnannagarajan criticalcare247butwhyiscriticalnutritioninterrupted AT daphneedk criticalcare247butwhyiscriticalnutritioninterrupted AT ranganathanlakshmi criticalcare247butwhyiscriticalnutritioninterrupted AT bhuvaneshwaris criticalcare247butwhyiscriticalnutritioninterrupted |