Cargando…

Intensity of Territorial Marking Predicts Wolf Reproduction: Implications for Wolf Monitoring

BACKGROUND: The implementation of intensive and complex approaches to monitor large carnivores is resource demanding, restricted to endangered species, small populations, or small distribution ranges. Wolf monitoring over large spatial scales is difficult, but the management of such contentious spec...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Llaneza, Luis, García, Emilio J., López-Bao, José Vicente
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3963981/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24663068
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0093015
_version_ 1782308576962805760
author Llaneza, Luis
García, Emilio J.
López-Bao, José Vicente
author_facet Llaneza, Luis
García, Emilio J.
López-Bao, José Vicente
author_sort Llaneza, Luis
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The implementation of intensive and complex approaches to monitor large carnivores is resource demanding, restricted to endangered species, small populations, or small distribution ranges. Wolf monitoring over large spatial scales is difficult, but the management of such contentious species requires regular estimations of abundance to guide decision-makers. The integration of wolf marking behaviour with simple sign counts may offer a cost-effective alternative to monitor the status of wolf populations over large spatial scales. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: We used a multi-sampling approach, based on the collection of visual and scent wolf marks (faeces and ground scratching) and the assessment of wolf reproduction using howling and observation points, to test whether the intensity of marking behaviour around the pup-rearing period (summer-autumn) could reflect wolf reproduction. Between 1994 and 2007 we collected 1,964 wolf marks in a total of 1,877 km surveyed and we searched for the pups' presence (1,497 howling and 307 observations points) in 42 sampling sites with a regular presence of wolves (120 sampling sites/year). The number of wolf marks was ca. 3 times higher in sites with a confirmed presence of pups (20.3 vs. 7.2 marks). We found a significant relationship between the number of wolf marks (mean and maximum relative abundance index) and the probability of wolf reproduction. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: This research establishes a real-time relationship between the intensity of wolf marking behaviour and wolf reproduction. We suggest a conservative cutting point of 0.60 for the probability of wolf reproduction to monitor wolves on a regional scale combined with the use of the mean relative abundance index of wolf marks in a given area. We show how the integration of wolf behaviour with simple sampling procedures permit rapid, real-time, and cost-effective assessments of the breeding status of wolf packs with substantial implications to monitor wolves at large spatial scales.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3963981
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39639812014-03-27 Intensity of Territorial Marking Predicts Wolf Reproduction: Implications for Wolf Monitoring Llaneza, Luis García, Emilio J. López-Bao, José Vicente PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: The implementation of intensive and complex approaches to monitor large carnivores is resource demanding, restricted to endangered species, small populations, or small distribution ranges. Wolf monitoring over large spatial scales is difficult, but the management of such contentious species requires regular estimations of abundance to guide decision-makers. The integration of wolf marking behaviour with simple sign counts may offer a cost-effective alternative to monitor the status of wolf populations over large spatial scales. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: We used a multi-sampling approach, based on the collection of visual and scent wolf marks (faeces and ground scratching) and the assessment of wolf reproduction using howling and observation points, to test whether the intensity of marking behaviour around the pup-rearing period (summer-autumn) could reflect wolf reproduction. Between 1994 and 2007 we collected 1,964 wolf marks in a total of 1,877 km surveyed and we searched for the pups' presence (1,497 howling and 307 observations points) in 42 sampling sites with a regular presence of wolves (120 sampling sites/year). The number of wolf marks was ca. 3 times higher in sites with a confirmed presence of pups (20.3 vs. 7.2 marks). We found a significant relationship between the number of wolf marks (mean and maximum relative abundance index) and the probability of wolf reproduction. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: This research establishes a real-time relationship between the intensity of wolf marking behaviour and wolf reproduction. We suggest a conservative cutting point of 0.60 for the probability of wolf reproduction to monitor wolves on a regional scale combined with the use of the mean relative abundance index of wolf marks in a given area. We show how the integration of wolf behaviour with simple sampling procedures permit rapid, real-time, and cost-effective assessments of the breeding status of wolf packs with substantial implications to monitor wolves at large spatial scales. Public Library of Science 2014-03-24 /pmc/articles/PMC3963981/ /pubmed/24663068 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0093015 Text en © 2014 Llaneza et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Llaneza, Luis
García, Emilio J.
López-Bao, José Vicente
Intensity of Territorial Marking Predicts Wolf Reproduction: Implications for Wolf Monitoring
title Intensity of Territorial Marking Predicts Wolf Reproduction: Implications for Wolf Monitoring
title_full Intensity of Territorial Marking Predicts Wolf Reproduction: Implications for Wolf Monitoring
title_fullStr Intensity of Territorial Marking Predicts Wolf Reproduction: Implications for Wolf Monitoring
title_full_unstemmed Intensity of Territorial Marking Predicts Wolf Reproduction: Implications for Wolf Monitoring
title_short Intensity of Territorial Marking Predicts Wolf Reproduction: Implications for Wolf Monitoring
title_sort intensity of territorial marking predicts wolf reproduction: implications for wolf monitoring
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3963981/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24663068
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0093015
work_keys_str_mv AT llanezaluis intensityofterritorialmarkingpredictswolfreproductionimplicationsforwolfmonitoring
AT garciaemilioj intensityofterritorialmarkingpredictswolfreproductionimplicationsforwolfmonitoring
AT lopezbaojosevicente intensityofterritorialmarkingpredictswolfreproductionimplicationsforwolfmonitoring