Cargando…

Anaerobic threshold, is it a magic number to determine fitness for surgery?

The use of cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) to evaluate cardiac and respiratory function was pioneered as part of preoperative assessment in the mid 1990s. Surgical procedures have changed since then. The patient population may have aged; however, the physiology has remained the same. The use...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Older, Paul
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3964343/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24472514
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2047-0525-2-2
_version_ 1782308638926307328
author Older, Paul
author_facet Older, Paul
author_sort Older, Paul
collection PubMed
description The use of cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) to evaluate cardiac and respiratory function was pioneered as part of preoperative assessment in the mid 1990s. Surgical procedures have changed since then. The patient population may have aged; however, the physiology has remained the same. The use of an accurate physiological evaluation remains as germane today as it was then. Certainly no ‘magic’ is involved. The author recognizes that not everyone accepts the classical theories of the anaerobic threshold (AT) and that there is some discussion around lactate and exercise. The article looks at aerobic capacity as an important predictor of perioperative mortality and also looks at some aspects of CPET relative to surgical risk evaluation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3964343
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39643432014-04-03 Anaerobic threshold, is it a magic number to determine fitness for surgery? Older, Paul Perioper Med (Lond) Review The use of cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) to evaluate cardiac and respiratory function was pioneered as part of preoperative assessment in the mid 1990s. Surgical procedures have changed since then. The patient population may have aged; however, the physiology has remained the same. The use of an accurate physiological evaluation remains as germane today as it was then. Certainly no ‘magic’ is involved. The author recognizes that not everyone accepts the classical theories of the anaerobic threshold (AT) and that there is some discussion around lactate and exercise. The article looks at aerobic capacity as an important predictor of perioperative mortality and also looks at some aspects of CPET relative to surgical risk evaluation. BioMed Central 2013-02-21 /pmc/articles/PMC3964343/ /pubmed/24472514 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2047-0525-2-2 Text en Copyright © 2013 Older.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review
Older, Paul
Anaerobic threshold, is it a magic number to determine fitness for surgery?
title Anaerobic threshold, is it a magic number to determine fitness for surgery?
title_full Anaerobic threshold, is it a magic number to determine fitness for surgery?
title_fullStr Anaerobic threshold, is it a magic number to determine fitness for surgery?
title_full_unstemmed Anaerobic threshold, is it a magic number to determine fitness for surgery?
title_short Anaerobic threshold, is it a magic number to determine fitness for surgery?
title_sort anaerobic threshold, is it a magic number to determine fitness for surgery?
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3964343/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24472514
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2047-0525-2-2
work_keys_str_mv AT olderpaul anaerobicthresholdisitamagicnumbertodeterminefitnessforsurgery