Cargando…

University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification on Iranian Population

BACKGROUND: University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test (UPSIT) is one of the most common smell identification tests to assess olfactory function. OBJECTIVES: The study was conducted to assess the accuracy of University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test (UPSIT) in Iranian population...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kamrava, Seyed Kamran, Farhadi, Mohammad, Jalessi, Maryam, Khosravian, Babak, Pousti, Behzad, Amin Tehran, Ebrahim, Rezaee Hemami, Mohsen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Kowsar 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3964434/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24719716
http://dx.doi.org/10.5812/ircmj.7926
_version_ 1782308643402678272
author Kamrava, Seyed Kamran
Farhadi, Mohammad
Jalessi, Maryam
Khosravian, Babak
Pousti, Behzad
Amin Tehran, Ebrahim
Rezaee Hemami, Mohsen
author_facet Kamrava, Seyed Kamran
Farhadi, Mohammad
Jalessi, Maryam
Khosravian, Babak
Pousti, Behzad
Amin Tehran, Ebrahim
Rezaee Hemami, Mohsen
author_sort Kamrava, Seyed Kamran
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test (UPSIT) is one of the most common smell identification tests to assess olfactory function. OBJECTIVES: The study was conducted to assess the accuracy of University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test (UPSIT) in Iranian population. MATERIALS AND METHODS: University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test was performed on 30 (50%) female and 30 (50%) male, who were healthy adult volunteers. The total mean score as well as mean scores according to the gender were assessed and compared to the UPSIT classification. Odors considered valid and accurate if its correct identification ability rate was more than 70% among study population. RESULTS: The test score was 25.04 ± 4.92 in female and 23.29 ± 4.23 in male volunteers that all were considered as microsmia according to UPSIT. Sixteen odorants were correctly identified by about 70% of the volunteers and the remains 24 odorants were identified by less than 70%; 7, 5 and 12 odors was identified by60%-70%, 50%-60% and less than 50% of the volunteers, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: According to the results of the study, documented that even less than half of the odors (16 out of 40) were identified correctly by the volunteers, which indicating that the UPSIT is not a suitable test to evaluate olfactory function in Iranian population due to the high amount of unfamiliar smells that should be replaced with more familiar ones.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3964434
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Kowsar
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39644342014-04-09 University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification on Iranian Population Kamrava, Seyed Kamran Farhadi, Mohammad Jalessi, Maryam Khosravian, Babak Pousti, Behzad Amin Tehran, Ebrahim Rezaee Hemami, Mohsen Iran Red Crescent Med J Research Article BACKGROUND: University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test (UPSIT) is one of the most common smell identification tests to assess olfactory function. OBJECTIVES: The study was conducted to assess the accuracy of University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test (UPSIT) in Iranian population. MATERIALS AND METHODS: University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test was performed on 30 (50%) female and 30 (50%) male, who were healthy adult volunteers. The total mean score as well as mean scores according to the gender were assessed and compared to the UPSIT classification. Odors considered valid and accurate if its correct identification ability rate was more than 70% among study population. RESULTS: The test score was 25.04 ± 4.92 in female and 23.29 ± 4.23 in male volunteers that all were considered as microsmia according to UPSIT. Sixteen odorants were correctly identified by about 70% of the volunteers and the remains 24 odorants were identified by less than 70%; 7, 5 and 12 odors was identified by60%-70%, 50%-60% and less than 50% of the volunteers, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: According to the results of the study, documented that even less than half of the odors (16 out of 40) were identified correctly by the volunteers, which indicating that the UPSIT is not a suitable test to evaluate olfactory function in Iranian population due to the high amount of unfamiliar smells that should be replaced with more familiar ones. Kowsar 2014-01-05 2014-01 /pmc/articles/PMC3964434/ /pubmed/24719716 http://dx.doi.org/10.5812/ircmj.7926 Text en Copyright © 2014, Iranian Red Crescent Medical Journal http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Kamrava, Seyed Kamran
Farhadi, Mohammad
Jalessi, Maryam
Khosravian, Babak
Pousti, Behzad
Amin Tehran, Ebrahim
Rezaee Hemami, Mohsen
University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification on Iranian Population
title University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification on Iranian Population
title_full University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification on Iranian Population
title_fullStr University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification on Iranian Population
title_full_unstemmed University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification on Iranian Population
title_short University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification on Iranian Population
title_sort university of pennsylvania smell identification on iranian population
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3964434/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24719716
http://dx.doi.org/10.5812/ircmj.7926
work_keys_str_mv AT kamravaseyedkamran universityofpennsylvaniasmellidentificationoniranianpopulation
AT farhadimohammad universityofpennsylvaniasmellidentificationoniranianpopulation
AT jalessimaryam universityofpennsylvaniasmellidentificationoniranianpopulation
AT khosravianbabak universityofpennsylvaniasmellidentificationoniranianpopulation
AT poustibehzad universityofpennsylvaniasmellidentificationoniranianpopulation
AT amintehranebrahim universityofpennsylvaniasmellidentificationoniranianpopulation
AT rezaeehemamimohsen universityofpennsylvaniasmellidentificationoniranianpopulation