Cargando…

Thoracotomy versus VATS: is there an optimal approach to treating pneumothorax?

INTRODUCTION: The 2010 British Thoracic Society guidelines recommend that a weighted decision be made by clinicians with regard to surgical intervention for pneumothorax as the video assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) approach is better tolerated by patients but carries a higher rate of recurrenc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Joshi, V, Kirmani, B, Zacharias, J
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Royal College of Surgeons 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3964642/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23317731
http://dx.doi.org/10.1308/003588413X13511609956138
_version_ 1782308672006782976
author Joshi, V
Kirmani, B
Zacharias, J
author_facet Joshi, V
Kirmani, B
Zacharias, J
author_sort Joshi, V
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: The 2010 British Thoracic Society guidelines recommend that a weighted decision be made by clinicians with regard to surgical intervention for pneumothorax as the video assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) approach is better tolerated by patients but carries a higher rate of recurrence (5% vs 1%). METHODS: Overall, 163 patients underwent surgical intervention for pneumothorax at our institution and data were collected prospectively for almost 7 years. Of these, 86 patients underwent VATS under a single surgeon with extensive VATS experience to compensate for the associated learning curve while 79 patients underwent an open procedure. RESULTS: There was no statistically significant difference in the recurrence rate between the open and the VATS group (1% vs 3.5%, p=1.0). The VATS group was superior to the open group in terms of reduced postoperative bleeding (7.5% vs 0%, p=0.01), reduced number of intensive care unit admissions (16% vs 0%, p<0.01) and a reduced adjusted length of stay (3 vs 5.5 days, p<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: A comparable recurrence rate is attainable with a VATS approach once the learning curve is surpassed and a reduction in morbidity is an additional merit.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3964642
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Royal College of Surgeons
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39646422014-07-17 Thoracotomy versus VATS: is there an optimal approach to treating pneumothorax? Joshi, V Kirmani, B Zacharias, J Ann R Coll Surg Engl Thoracic INTRODUCTION: The 2010 British Thoracic Society guidelines recommend that a weighted decision be made by clinicians with regard to surgical intervention for pneumothorax as the video assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) approach is better tolerated by patients but carries a higher rate of recurrence (5% vs 1%). METHODS: Overall, 163 patients underwent surgical intervention for pneumothorax at our institution and data were collected prospectively for almost 7 years. Of these, 86 patients underwent VATS under a single surgeon with extensive VATS experience to compensate for the associated learning curve while 79 patients underwent an open procedure. RESULTS: There was no statistically significant difference in the recurrence rate between the open and the VATS group (1% vs 3.5%, p=1.0). The VATS group was superior to the open group in terms of reduced postoperative bleeding (7.5% vs 0%, p=0.01), reduced number of intensive care unit admissions (16% vs 0%, p<0.01) and a reduced adjusted length of stay (3 vs 5.5 days, p<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: A comparable recurrence rate is attainable with a VATS approach once the learning curve is surpassed and a reduction in morbidity is an additional merit. Royal College of Surgeons 2013-01 2013-01 /pmc/articles/PMC3964642/ /pubmed/23317731 http://dx.doi.org/10.1308/003588413X13511609956138 Text en Copyright © 2013 Royal College of Surgeons http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Thoracic
Joshi, V
Kirmani, B
Zacharias, J
Thoracotomy versus VATS: is there an optimal approach to treating pneumothorax?
title Thoracotomy versus VATS: is there an optimal approach to treating pneumothorax?
title_full Thoracotomy versus VATS: is there an optimal approach to treating pneumothorax?
title_fullStr Thoracotomy versus VATS: is there an optimal approach to treating pneumothorax?
title_full_unstemmed Thoracotomy versus VATS: is there an optimal approach to treating pneumothorax?
title_short Thoracotomy versus VATS: is there an optimal approach to treating pneumothorax?
title_sort thoracotomy versus vats: is there an optimal approach to treating pneumothorax?
topic Thoracic
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3964642/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23317731
http://dx.doi.org/10.1308/003588413X13511609956138
work_keys_str_mv AT joshiv thoracotomyversusvatsisthereanoptimalapproachtotreatingpneumothorax
AT kirmanib thoracotomyversusvatsisthereanoptimalapproachtotreatingpneumothorax
AT zachariasj thoracotomyversusvatsisthereanoptimalapproachtotreatingpneumothorax