Cargando…
Thoracotomy versus VATS: is there an optimal approach to treating pneumothorax?
INTRODUCTION: The 2010 British Thoracic Society guidelines recommend that a weighted decision be made by clinicians with regard to surgical intervention for pneumothorax as the video assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) approach is better tolerated by patients but carries a higher rate of recurrenc...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Royal College of Surgeons
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3964642/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23317731 http://dx.doi.org/10.1308/003588413X13511609956138 |
_version_ | 1782308672006782976 |
---|---|
author | Joshi, V Kirmani, B Zacharias, J |
author_facet | Joshi, V Kirmani, B Zacharias, J |
author_sort | Joshi, V |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: The 2010 British Thoracic Society guidelines recommend that a weighted decision be made by clinicians with regard to surgical intervention for pneumothorax as the video assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) approach is better tolerated by patients but carries a higher rate of recurrence (5% vs 1%). METHODS: Overall, 163 patients underwent surgical intervention for pneumothorax at our institution and data were collected prospectively for almost 7 years. Of these, 86 patients underwent VATS under a single surgeon with extensive VATS experience to compensate for the associated learning curve while 79 patients underwent an open procedure. RESULTS: There was no statistically significant difference in the recurrence rate between the open and the VATS group (1% vs 3.5%, p=1.0). The VATS group was superior to the open group in terms of reduced postoperative bleeding (7.5% vs 0%, p=0.01), reduced number of intensive care unit admissions (16% vs 0%, p<0.01) and a reduced adjusted length of stay (3 vs 5.5 days, p<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: A comparable recurrence rate is attainable with a VATS approach once the learning curve is surpassed and a reduction in morbidity is an additional merit. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3964642 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Royal College of Surgeons |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-39646422014-07-17 Thoracotomy versus VATS: is there an optimal approach to treating pneumothorax? Joshi, V Kirmani, B Zacharias, J Ann R Coll Surg Engl Thoracic INTRODUCTION: The 2010 British Thoracic Society guidelines recommend that a weighted decision be made by clinicians with regard to surgical intervention for pneumothorax as the video assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) approach is better tolerated by patients but carries a higher rate of recurrence (5% vs 1%). METHODS: Overall, 163 patients underwent surgical intervention for pneumothorax at our institution and data were collected prospectively for almost 7 years. Of these, 86 patients underwent VATS under a single surgeon with extensive VATS experience to compensate for the associated learning curve while 79 patients underwent an open procedure. RESULTS: There was no statistically significant difference in the recurrence rate between the open and the VATS group (1% vs 3.5%, p=1.0). The VATS group was superior to the open group in terms of reduced postoperative bleeding (7.5% vs 0%, p=0.01), reduced number of intensive care unit admissions (16% vs 0%, p<0.01) and a reduced adjusted length of stay (3 vs 5.5 days, p<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: A comparable recurrence rate is attainable with a VATS approach once the learning curve is surpassed and a reduction in morbidity is an additional merit. Royal College of Surgeons 2013-01 2013-01 /pmc/articles/PMC3964642/ /pubmed/23317731 http://dx.doi.org/10.1308/003588413X13511609956138 Text en Copyright © 2013 Royal College of Surgeons http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Thoracic Joshi, V Kirmani, B Zacharias, J Thoracotomy versus VATS: is there an optimal approach to treating pneumothorax? |
title | Thoracotomy versus VATS: is there an optimal approach to treating pneumothorax? |
title_full | Thoracotomy versus VATS: is there an optimal approach to treating pneumothorax? |
title_fullStr | Thoracotomy versus VATS: is there an optimal approach to treating pneumothorax? |
title_full_unstemmed | Thoracotomy versus VATS: is there an optimal approach to treating pneumothorax? |
title_short | Thoracotomy versus VATS: is there an optimal approach to treating pneumothorax? |
title_sort | thoracotomy versus vats: is there an optimal approach to treating pneumothorax? |
topic | Thoracic |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3964642/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23317731 http://dx.doi.org/10.1308/003588413X13511609956138 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT joshiv thoracotomyversusvatsisthereanoptimalapproachtotreatingpneumothorax AT kirmanib thoracotomyversusvatsisthereanoptimalapproachtotreatingpneumothorax AT zachariasj thoracotomyversusvatsisthereanoptimalapproachtotreatingpneumothorax |