Cargando…
Study Assessing the Quality of Quantification of Estrogen Receptor Protein Expression by Immunohistochemistry and Gene Expression in Breast Cancer
Although immunohistochemistry (IHC) is a widely used technique to classify tumors in ER-positive versus ER-negative ones, interlab variabilities can occur. This study aims to investigate the influences of preanalytical and analytical factors on IHC results. For this purpose, the different steps of t...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3964839/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24734208 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/372653 |
_version_ | 1782479247285157888 |
---|---|
author | Leen, Sas Steven, Van Laere Marie, Dierick Anne Valérie, Duwel Annemie, De Pauw Gert, Van Den Eynden Peter, Van Dam Luc, Dirix Peter, Vermeulen Filip, Lardon |
author_facet | Leen, Sas Steven, Van Laere Marie, Dierick Anne Valérie, Duwel Annemie, De Pauw Gert, Van Den Eynden Peter, Van Dam Luc, Dirix Peter, Vermeulen Filip, Lardon |
author_sort | Leen, Sas |
collection | PubMed |
description | Although immunohistochemistry (IHC) is a widely used technique to classify tumors in ER-positive versus ER-negative ones, interlab variabilities can occur. This study aims to investigate the influences of preanalytical and analytical factors on IHC results. For this purpose, the different steps of the preparation of IHC sections and scoring procedures were compared between two participating laboratories and a central lab. There was a significant positive correlation between the IHC results of the participating laboratories and those of the central lab (correlation coefficient > 0.600; P<0.05). Nevertheless, some discordant cases for immunostaining (5.3% for ER and 5.6% for PR) and for scoring (10.5% for PR) occur at site 1. Comparing IHC results with ESR1 gene expression results revealed a significant positive correlation (correlation coefficients > 0.769; P<0.05). PCR results of ER target genes showed some heterogeneity in the ER-signalling pathway. These results suggest that differences in the IHC procedure between these laboratories did not have a big influence on the end result. Nevertheless, discordant cases caused by preanalytical and analytical lab-specific procedures have been identified. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3964839 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Hindawi Publishing Corporation |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-39648392014-04-14 Study Assessing the Quality of Quantification of Estrogen Receptor Protein Expression by Immunohistochemistry and Gene Expression in Breast Cancer Leen, Sas Steven, Van Laere Marie, Dierick Anne Valérie, Duwel Annemie, De Pauw Gert, Van Den Eynden Peter, Van Dam Luc, Dirix Peter, Vermeulen Filip, Lardon Patholog Res Int Research Article Although immunohistochemistry (IHC) is a widely used technique to classify tumors in ER-positive versus ER-negative ones, interlab variabilities can occur. This study aims to investigate the influences of preanalytical and analytical factors on IHC results. For this purpose, the different steps of the preparation of IHC sections and scoring procedures were compared between two participating laboratories and a central lab. There was a significant positive correlation between the IHC results of the participating laboratories and those of the central lab (correlation coefficient > 0.600; P<0.05). Nevertheless, some discordant cases for immunostaining (5.3% for ER and 5.6% for PR) and for scoring (10.5% for PR) occur at site 1. Comparing IHC results with ESR1 gene expression results revealed a significant positive correlation (correlation coefficients > 0.769; P<0.05). PCR results of ER target genes showed some heterogeneity in the ER-signalling pathway. These results suggest that differences in the IHC procedure between these laboratories did not have a big influence on the end result. Nevertheless, discordant cases caused by preanalytical and analytical lab-specific procedures have been identified. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2014 2014-03-06 /pmc/articles/PMC3964839/ /pubmed/24734208 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/372653 Text en Copyright © 2014 Sas Leen et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Leen, Sas Steven, Van Laere Marie, Dierick Anne Valérie, Duwel Annemie, De Pauw Gert, Van Den Eynden Peter, Van Dam Luc, Dirix Peter, Vermeulen Filip, Lardon Study Assessing the Quality of Quantification of Estrogen Receptor Protein Expression by Immunohistochemistry and Gene Expression in Breast Cancer |
title | Study Assessing the Quality of Quantification of Estrogen Receptor Protein Expression by Immunohistochemistry and Gene Expression in Breast Cancer |
title_full | Study Assessing the Quality of Quantification of Estrogen Receptor Protein Expression by Immunohistochemistry and Gene Expression in Breast Cancer |
title_fullStr | Study Assessing the Quality of Quantification of Estrogen Receptor Protein Expression by Immunohistochemistry and Gene Expression in Breast Cancer |
title_full_unstemmed | Study Assessing the Quality of Quantification of Estrogen Receptor Protein Expression by Immunohistochemistry and Gene Expression in Breast Cancer |
title_short | Study Assessing the Quality of Quantification of Estrogen Receptor Protein Expression by Immunohistochemistry and Gene Expression in Breast Cancer |
title_sort | study assessing the quality of quantification of estrogen receptor protein expression by immunohistochemistry and gene expression in breast cancer |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3964839/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24734208 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/372653 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT leensas studyassessingthequalityofquantificationofestrogenreceptorproteinexpressionbyimmunohistochemistryandgeneexpressioninbreastcancer AT stevenvanlaere studyassessingthequalityofquantificationofestrogenreceptorproteinexpressionbyimmunohistochemistryandgeneexpressioninbreastcancer AT mariedierickanne studyassessingthequalityofquantificationofestrogenreceptorproteinexpressionbyimmunohistochemistryandgeneexpressioninbreastcancer AT valerieduwel studyassessingthequalityofquantificationofestrogenreceptorproteinexpressionbyimmunohistochemistryandgeneexpressioninbreastcancer AT annemiedepauw studyassessingthequalityofquantificationofestrogenreceptorproteinexpressionbyimmunohistochemistryandgeneexpressioninbreastcancer AT gertvandeneynden studyassessingthequalityofquantificationofestrogenreceptorproteinexpressionbyimmunohistochemistryandgeneexpressioninbreastcancer AT petervandam studyassessingthequalityofquantificationofestrogenreceptorproteinexpressionbyimmunohistochemistryandgeneexpressioninbreastcancer AT lucdirix studyassessingthequalityofquantificationofestrogenreceptorproteinexpressionbyimmunohistochemistryandgeneexpressioninbreastcancer AT petervermeulen studyassessingthequalityofquantificationofestrogenreceptorproteinexpressionbyimmunohistochemistryandgeneexpressioninbreastcancer AT filiplardon studyassessingthequalityofquantificationofestrogenreceptorproteinexpressionbyimmunohistochemistryandgeneexpressioninbreastcancer |