Cargando…

Study Assessing the Quality of Quantification of Estrogen Receptor Protein Expression by Immunohistochemistry and Gene Expression in Breast Cancer

Although immunohistochemistry (IHC) is a widely used technique to classify tumors in ER-positive versus ER-negative ones, interlab variabilities can occur. This study aims to investigate the influences of preanalytical and analytical factors on IHC results. For this purpose, the different steps of t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Leen, Sas, Steven, Van Laere, Marie, Dierick Anne, Valérie, Duwel, Annemie, De Pauw, Gert, Van Den Eynden, Peter, Van Dam, Luc, Dirix, Peter, Vermeulen, Filip, Lardon
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3964839/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24734208
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/372653
_version_ 1782479247285157888
author Leen, Sas
Steven, Van Laere
Marie, Dierick Anne
Valérie, Duwel
Annemie, De Pauw
Gert, Van Den Eynden
Peter, Van Dam
Luc, Dirix
Peter, Vermeulen
Filip, Lardon
author_facet Leen, Sas
Steven, Van Laere
Marie, Dierick Anne
Valérie, Duwel
Annemie, De Pauw
Gert, Van Den Eynden
Peter, Van Dam
Luc, Dirix
Peter, Vermeulen
Filip, Lardon
author_sort Leen, Sas
collection PubMed
description Although immunohistochemistry (IHC) is a widely used technique to classify tumors in ER-positive versus ER-negative ones, interlab variabilities can occur. This study aims to investigate the influences of preanalytical and analytical factors on IHC results. For this purpose, the different steps of the preparation of IHC sections and scoring procedures were compared between two participating laboratories and a central lab. There was a significant positive correlation between the IHC results of the participating laboratories and those of the central lab (correlation coefficient > 0.600; P<0.05). Nevertheless, some discordant cases for immunostaining (5.3% for ER and 5.6% for PR) and for scoring (10.5% for PR) occur at site 1. Comparing IHC results with ESR1 gene expression results revealed a significant positive correlation (correlation coefficients > 0.769; P<0.05). PCR results of ER target genes showed some heterogeneity in the ER-signalling pathway. These results suggest that differences in the IHC procedure between these laboratories did not have a big influence on the end result. Nevertheless, discordant cases caused by preanalytical and analytical lab-specific procedures have been identified.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3964839
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39648392014-04-14 Study Assessing the Quality of Quantification of Estrogen Receptor Protein Expression by Immunohistochemistry and Gene Expression in Breast Cancer Leen, Sas Steven, Van Laere Marie, Dierick Anne Valérie, Duwel Annemie, De Pauw Gert, Van Den Eynden Peter, Van Dam Luc, Dirix Peter, Vermeulen Filip, Lardon Patholog Res Int Research Article Although immunohistochemistry (IHC) is a widely used technique to classify tumors in ER-positive versus ER-negative ones, interlab variabilities can occur. This study aims to investigate the influences of preanalytical and analytical factors on IHC results. For this purpose, the different steps of the preparation of IHC sections and scoring procedures were compared between two participating laboratories and a central lab. There was a significant positive correlation between the IHC results of the participating laboratories and those of the central lab (correlation coefficient > 0.600; P<0.05). Nevertheless, some discordant cases for immunostaining (5.3% for ER and 5.6% for PR) and for scoring (10.5% for PR) occur at site 1. Comparing IHC results with ESR1 gene expression results revealed a significant positive correlation (correlation coefficients > 0.769; P<0.05). PCR results of ER target genes showed some heterogeneity in the ER-signalling pathway. These results suggest that differences in the IHC procedure between these laboratories did not have a big influence on the end result. Nevertheless, discordant cases caused by preanalytical and analytical lab-specific procedures have been identified. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2014 2014-03-06 /pmc/articles/PMC3964839/ /pubmed/24734208 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/372653 Text en Copyright © 2014 Sas Leen et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Leen, Sas
Steven, Van Laere
Marie, Dierick Anne
Valérie, Duwel
Annemie, De Pauw
Gert, Van Den Eynden
Peter, Van Dam
Luc, Dirix
Peter, Vermeulen
Filip, Lardon
Study Assessing the Quality of Quantification of Estrogen Receptor Protein Expression by Immunohistochemistry and Gene Expression in Breast Cancer
title Study Assessing the Quality of Quantification of Estrogen Receptor Protein Expression by Immunohistochemistry and Gene Expression in Breast Cancer
title_full Study Assessing the Quality of Quantification of Estrogen Receptor Protein Expression by Immunohistochemistry and Gene Expression in Breast Cancer
title_fullStr Study Assessing the Quality of Quantification of Estrogen Receptor Protein Expression by Immunohistochemistry and Gene Expression in Breast Cancer
title_full_unstemmed Study Assessing the Quality of Quantification of Estrogen Receptor Protein Expression by Immunohistochemistry and Gene Expression in Breast Cancer
title_short Study Assessing the Quality of Quantification of Estrogen Receptor Protein Expression by Immunohistochemistry and Gene Expression in Breast Cancer
title_sort study assessing the quality of quantification of estrogen receptor protein expression by immunohistochemistry and gene expression in breast cancer
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3964839/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24734208
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/372653
work_keys_str_mv AT leensas studyassessingthequalityofquantificationofestrogenreceptorproteinexpressionbyimmunohistochemistryandgeneexpressioninbreastcancer
AT stevenvanlaere studyassessingthequalityofquantificationofestrogenreceptorproteinexpressionbyimmunohistochemistryandgeneexpressioninbreastcancer
AT mariedierickanne studyassessingthequalityofquantificationofestrogenreceptorproteinexpressionbyimmunohistochemistryandgeneexpressioninbreastcancer
AT valerieduwel studyassessingthequalityofquantificationofestrogenreceptorproteinexpressionbyimmunohistochemistryandgeneexpressioninbreastcancer
AT annemiedepauw studyassessingthequalityofquantificationofestrogenreceptorproteinexpressionbyimmunohistochemistryandgeneexpressioninbreastcancer
AT gertvandeneynden studyassessingthequalityofquantificationofestrogenreceptorproteinexpressionbyimmunohistochemistryandgeneexpressioninbreastcancer
AT petervandam studyassessingthequalityofquantificationofestrogenreceptorproteinexpressionbyimmunohistochemistryandgeneexpressioninbreastcancer
AT lucdirix studyassessingthequalityofquantificationofestrogenreceptorproteinexpressionbyimmunohistochemistryandgeneexpressioninbreastcancer
AT petervermeulen studyassessingthequalityofquantificationofestrogenreceptorproteinexpressionbyimmunohistochemistryandgeneexpressioninbreastcancer
AT filiplardon studyassessingthequalityofquantificationofestrogenreceptorproteinexpressionbyimmunohistochemistryandgeneexpressioninbreastcancer