Cargando…

Use of ultrasonography in developmental dysplasia of the hip

PURPOSE: Ultrasonography has been used as a diagnostic tool in developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) during early infancy since the early 1980s. The aim of this review article is to summarise the technique, benefits and shortcomings of four infantile hip ultrasonography methods, focusing mainly o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Ömeroğlu, Hakan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3965765/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24510434
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11832-014-0561-8
_version_ 1782308839390969856
author Ömeroğlu, Hakan
author_facet Ömeroğlu, Hakan
author_sort Ömeroğlu, Hakan
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Ultrasonography has been used as a diagnostic tool in developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) during early infancy since the early 1980s. The aim of this review article is to summarise the technique, benefits and shortcomings of four infantile hip ultrasonography methods, focusing mainly on the Graf method, and to assess the effectiveness of ultrasonographic newborn hip screening programmes. METHODS: Several infantile hip ultrasonography methods have been defined to assess the relationship between the femoral head and acetabulum. The Graf, Harcke, Terjesen and Suzuki methods are the universally known ones. The Graf method is composed of a quantitative classification system, while the Harcke and Suzuki methods have qualitative definitions and the Terjesen method contains both quantitative and qualitative descriptions. RESULTS: Although the results of several studies assessing the sensitivity and consistency of the ultrasonography methods have still not proven a clear dominance of one of these techniques, the primary advantage of the Graf method is that it has a standardised examination technique, as well as a very well defined numeric hip typing system. The importance of newborn hip screening has been universally accepted, but there is still no strong evidence regarding the superiority of either universal (screening of all newborns) or selective (screening of high-risk newborns) ultrasonographic newborn hip screening programmes. CONCLUSIONS: An effective ultrasonographic method should include simple, precise, quantitative and consistent definitions for a proper examination and diagnosis. Both universal and selective ultrasonographic newborn hip screening programmes have significantly decreased the rate of late detected DDH and lessened the need for surgical treatment.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3965765
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39657652014-03-28 Use of ultrasonography in developmental dysplasia of the hip Ömeroğlu, Hakan J Child Orthop Current Concept Review PURPOSE: Ultrasonography has been used as a diagnostic tool in developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) during early infancy since the early 1980s. The aim of this review article is to summarise the technique, benefits and shortcomings of four infantile hip ultrasonography methods, focusing mainly on the Graf method, and to assess the effectiveness of ultrasonographic newborn hip screening programmes. METHODS: Several infantile hip ultrasonography methods have been defined to assess the relationship between the femoral head and acetabulum. The Graf, Harcke, Terjesen and Suzuki methods are the universally known ones. The Graf method is composed of a quantitative classification system, while the Harcke and Suzuki methods have qualitative definitions and the Terjesen method contains both quantitative and qualitative descriptions. RESULTS: Although the results of several studies assessing the sensitivity and consistency of the ultrasonography methods have still not proven a clear dominance of one of these techniques, the primary advantage of the Graf method is that it has a standardised examination technique, as well as a very well defined numeric hip typing system. The importance of newborn hip screening has been universally accepted, but there is still no strong evidence regarding the superiority of either universal (screening of all newborns) or selective (screening of high-risk newborns) ultrasonographic newborn hip screening programmes. CONCLUSIONS: An effective ultrasonographic method should include simple, precise, quantitative and consistent definitions for a proper examination and diagnosis. Both universal and selective ultrasonographic newborn hip screening programmes have significantly decreased the rate of late detected DDH and lessened the need for surgical treatment. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2014-02-09 2014-03 /pmc/articles/PMC3965765/ /pubmed/24510434 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11832-014-0561-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2014 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits any use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited.
spellingShingle Current Concept Review
Ömeroğlu, Hakan
Use of ultrasonography in developmental dysplasia of the hip
title Use of ultrasonography in developmental dysplasia of the hip
title_full Use of ultrasonography in developmental dysplasia of the hip
title_fullStr Use of ultrasonography in developmental dysplasia of the hip
title_full_unstemmed Use of ultrasonography in developmental dysplasia of the hip
title_short Use of ultrasonography in developmental dysplasia of the hip
title_sort use of ultrasonography in developmental dysplasia of the hip
topic Current Concept Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3965765/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24510434
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11832-014-0561-8
work_keys_str_mv AT omerogluhakan useofultrasonographyindevelopmentaldysplasiaofthehip