Cargando…

The cerebrovascular response to graded Valsalva maneuvers while standing

The Valsalva maneuver (VM) produces large and abrupt increases in mean arterial pressure (MAP) at the onset of strain (Phase I), however, hypotension, sufficient to induce syncope, occurs upon VM release (phase III). We examined the effect of VM intensity and duration on middle cerebral artery blood...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Perry, Blake G., Mündel, Toby, Cochrane, Darryl J., Cotter, James D., Lucas, Samuel J. E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wiley Periodicals, Inc. 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3966248/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24744902
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/phy2.233
_version_ 1782308884294139904
author Perry, Blake G.
Mündel, Toby
Cochrane, Darryl J.
Cotter, James D.
Lucas, Samuel J. E.
author_facet Perry, Blake G.
Mündel, Toby
Cochrane, Darryl J.
Cotter, James D.
Lucas, Samuel J. E.
author_sort Perry, Blake G.
collection PubMed
description The Valsalva maneuver (VM) produces large and abrupt increases in mean arterial pressure (MAP) at the onset of strain (Phase I), however, hypotension, sufficient to induce syncope, occurs upon VM release (phase III). We examined the effect of VM intensity and duration on middle cerebral artery blood velocity (MCAv) responses. Healthy men (n =10; mean ± SD: 26 ± 4 years) completed 30%, 60%, and 90% of their maximal VM mouth pressure, for 5 and 10 sec (order randomized) while standing. Beat‐to‐beat MCAv and MAP during phase I (peak), at nadir (phase III), and recovery are reported as the change from standing baseline. During phase I, MCAv rose 15 ± 6 cm·s(−1) (P <0.001), which was not reliably different between intensities (P =0.11), despite graded increases in MAP (P <0.001; e.g., +12 ± 9 mmHg vs. +35 ± 14 for 5 sec 30% and 90% VM, respectively). During Phase III, the MCAv response was duration‐ (P = 0.045) and intensity dependent (P < 0.001), with the largest decrease observed following the 90% VM (e.g., −19 ± 13 and −15 ± 11 cm·s(−1) for 5 and 10 sec VM, respectively) with a concomitant decrease in MAP (P <0.001, −23 ± 11 and −23 ± 9 mmHg). This asymmetric response may be attributable to the differential modulators of MCAv throughout the VM. The mechanical effects of the elevated intrathoracic pressure during phase I may restrain increases in cerebral perfusion via related increases in intracranial pressure; however, during phase III the decrease in MCAv arises from an abrupt hypotension, the extent of which is dependent upon both the duration and intensity of the VM.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3966248
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39662482014-03-31 The cerebrovascular response to graded Valsalva maneuvers while standing Perry, Blake G. Mündel, Toby Cochrane, Darryl J. Cotter, James D. Lucas, Samuel J. E. Physiol Rep Original Research The Valsalva maneuver (VM) produces large and abrupt increases in mean arterial pressure (MAP) at the onset of strain (Phase I), however, hypotension, sufficient to induce syncope, occurs upon VM release (phase III). We examined the effect of VM intensity and duration on middle cerebral artery blood velocity (MCAv) responses. Healthy men (n =10; mean ± SD: 26 ± 4 years) completed 30%, 60%, and 90% of their maximal VM mouth pressure, for 5 and 10 sec (order randomized) while standing. Beat‐to‐beat MCAv and MAP during phase I (peak), at nadir (phase III), and recovery are reported as the change from standing baseline. During phase I, MCAv rose 15 ± 6 cm·s(−1) (P <0.001), which was not reliably different between intensities (P =0.11), despite graded increases in MAP (P <0.001; e.g., +12 ± 9 mmHg vs. +35 ± 14 for 5 sec 30% and 90% VM, respectively). During Phase III, the MCAv response was duration‐ (P = 0.045) and intensity dependent (P < 0.001), with the largest decrease observed following the 90% VM (e.g., −19 ± 13 and −15 ± 11 cm·s(−1) for 5 and 10 sec VM, respectively) with a concomitant decrease in MAP (P <0.001, −23 ± 11 and −23 ± 9 mmHg). This asymmetric response may be attributable to the differential modulators of MCAv throughout the VM. The mechanical effects of the elevated intrathoracic pressure during phase I may restrain increases in cerebral perfusion via related increases in intracranial pressure; however, during phase III the decrease in MCAv arises from an abrupt hypotension, the extent of which is dependent upon both the duration and intensity of the VM. Wiley Periodicals, Inc. 2014-02-10 /pmc/articles/PMC3966248/ /pubmed/24744902 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/phy2.233 Text en © 2014 The Authors. Physiological Reports published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of the American Physiological Society and The Physiological Society. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Perry, Blake G.
Mündel, Toby
Cochrane, Darryl J.
Cotter, James D.
Lucas, Samuel J. E.
The cerebrovascular response to graded Valsalva maneuvers while standing
title The cerebrovascular response to graded Valsalva maneuvers while standing
title_full The cerebrovascular response to graded Valsalva maneuvers while standing
title_fullStr The cerebrovascular response to graded Valsalva maneuvers while standing
title_full_unstemmed The cerebrovascular response to graded Valsalva maneuvers while standing
title_short The cerebrovascular response to graded Valsalva maneuvers while standing
title_sort cerebrovascular response to graded valsalva maneuvers while standing
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3966248/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24744902
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/phy2.233
work_keys_str_mv AT perryblakeg thecerebrovascularresponsetogradedvalsalvamaneuverswhilestanding
AT mundeltoby thecerebrovascularresponsetogradedvalsalvamaneuverswhilestanding
AT cochranedarrylj thecerebrovascularresponsetogradedvalsalvamaneuverswhilestanding
AT cotterjamesd thecerebrovascularresponsetogradedvalsalvamaneuverswhilestanding
AT lucassamuelje thecerebrovascularresponsetogradedvalsalvamaneuverswhilestanding
AT perryblakeg cerebrovascularresponsetogradedvalsalvamaneuverswhilestanding
AT mundeltoby cerebrovascularresponsetogradedvalsalvamaneuverswhilestanding
AT cochranedarrylj cerebrovascularresponsetogradedvalsalvamaneuverswhilestanding
AT cotterjamesd cerebrovascularresponsetogradedvalsalvamaneuverswhilestanding
AT lucassamuelje cerebrovascularresponsetogradedvalsalvamaneuverswhilestanding