Cargando…
The cerebrovascular response to graded Valsalva maneuvers while standing
The Valsalva maneuver (VM) produces large and abrupt increases in mean arterial pressure (MAP) at the onset of strain (Phase I), however, hypotension, sufficient to induce syncope, occurs upon VM release (phase III). We examined the effect of VM intensity and duration on middle cerebral artery blood...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3966248/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24744902 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/phy2.233 |
_version_ | 1782308884294139904 |
---|---|
author | Perry, Blake G. Mündel, Toby Cochrane, Darryl J. Cotter, James D. Lucas, Samuel J. E. |
author_facet | Perry, Blake G. Mündel, Toby Cochrane, Darryl J. Cotter, James D. Lucas, Samuel J. E. |
author_sort | Perry, Blake G. |
collection | PubMed |
description | The Valsalva maneuver (VM) produces large and abrupt increases in mean arterial pressure (MAP) at the onset of strain (Phase I), however, hypotension, sufficient to induce syncope, occurs upon VM release (phase III). We examined the effect of VM intensity and duration on middle cerebral artery blood velocity (MCAv) responses. Healthy men (n =10; mean ± SD: 26 ± 4 years) completed 30%, 60%, and 90% of their maximal VM mouth pressure, for 5 and 10 sec (order randomized) while standing. Beat‐to‐beat MCAv and MAP during phase I (peak), at nadir (phase III), and recovery are reported as the change from standing baseline. During phase I, MCAv rose 15 ± 6 cm·s(−1) (P <0.001), which was not reliably different between intensities (P =0.11), despite graded increases in MAP (P <0.001; e.g., +12 ± 9 mmHg vs. +35 ± 14 for 5 sec 30% and 90% VM, respectively). During Phase III, the MCAv response was duration‐ (P = 0.045) and intensity dependent (P < 0.001), with the largest decrease observed following the 90% VM (e.g., −19 ± 13 and −15 ± 11 cm·s(−1) for 5 and 10 sec VM, respectively) with a concomitant decrease in MAP (P <0.001, −23 ± 11 and −23 ± 9 mmHg). This asymmetric response may be attributable to the differential modulators of MCAv throughout the VM. The mechanical effects of the elevated intrathoracic pressure during phase I may restrain increases in cerebral perfusion via related increases in intracranial pressure; however, during phase III the decrease in MCAv arises from an abrupt hypotension, the extent of which is dependent upon both the duration and intensity of the VM. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3966248 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Wiley Periodicals, Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-39662482014-03-31 The cerebrovascular response to graded Valsalva maneuvers while standing Perry, Blake G. Mündel, Toby Cochrane, Darryl J. Cotter, James D. Lucas, Samuel J. E. Physiol Rep Original Research The Valsalva maneuver (VM) produces large and abrupt increases in mean arterial pressure (MAP) at the onset of strain (Phase I), however, hypotension, sufficient to induce syncope, occurs upon VM release (phase III). We examined the effect of VM intensity and duration on middle cerebral artery blood velocity (MCAv) responses. Healthy men (n =10; mean ± SD: 26 ± 4 years) completed 30%, 60%, and 90% of their maximal VM mouth pressure, for 5 and 10 sec (order randomized) while standing. Beat‐to‐beat MCAv and MAP during phase I (peak), at nadir (phase III), and recovery are reported as the change from standing baseline. During phase I, MCAv rose 15 ± 6 cm·s(−1) (P <0.001), which was not reliably different between intensities (P =0.11), despite graded increases in MAP (P <0.001; e.g., +12 ± 9 mmHg vs. +35 ± 14 for 5 sec 30% and 90% VM, respectively). During Phase III, the MCAv response was duration‐ (P = 0.045) and intensity dependent (P < 0.001), with the largest decrease observed following the 90% VM (e.g., −19 ± 13 and −15 ± 11 cm·s(−1) for 5 and 10 sec VM, respectively) with a concomitant decrease in MAP (P <0.001, −23 ± 11 and −23 ± 9 mmHg). This asymmetric response may be attributable to the differential modulators of MCAv throughout the VM. The mechanical effects of the elevated intrathoracic pressure during phase I may restrain increases in cerebral perfusion via related increases in intracranial pressure; however, during phase III the decrease in MCAv arises from an abrupt hypotension, the extent of which is dependent upon both the duration and intensity of the VM. Wiley Periodicals, Inc. 2014-02-10 /pmc/articles/PMC3966248/ /pubmed/24744902 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/phy2.233 Text en © 2014 The Authors. Physiological Reports published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of the American Physiological Society and The Physiological Society. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Perry, Blake G. Mündel, Toby Cochrane, Darryl J. Cotter, James D. Lucas, Samuel J. E. The cerebrovascular response to graded Valsalva maneuvers while standing |
title | The cerebrovascular response to graded Valsalva maneuvers while standing |
title_full | The cerebrovascular response to graded Valsalva maneuvers while standing |
title_fullStr | The cerebrovascular response to graded Valsalva maneuvers while standing |
title_full_unstemmed | The cerebrovascular response to graded Valsalva maneuvers while standing |
title_short | The cerebrovascular response to graded Valsalva maneuvers while standing |
title_sort | cerebrovascular response to graded valsalva maneuvers while standing |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3966248/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24744902 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/phy2.233 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT perryblakeg thecerebrovascularresponsetogradedvalsalvamaneuverswhilestanding AT mundeltoby thecerebrovascularresponsetogradedvalsalvamaneuverswhilestanding AT cochranedarrylj thecerebrovascularresponsetogradedvalsalvamaneuverswhilestanding AT cotterjamesd thecerebrovascularresponsetogradedvalsalvamaneuverswhilestanding AT lucassamuelje thecerebrovascularresponsetogradedvalsalvamaneuverswhilestanding AT perryblakeg cerebrovascularresponsetogradedvalsalvamaneuverswhilestanding AT mundeltoby cerebrovascularresponsetogradedvalsalvamaneuverswhilestanding AT cochranedarrylj cerebrovascularresponsetogradedvalsalvamaneuverswhilestanding AT cotterjamesd cerebrovascularresponsetogradedvalsalvamaneuverswhilestanding AT lucassamuelje cerebrovascularresponsetogradedvalsalvamaneuverswhilestanding |