Cargando…

HADDOCK(2P2I): A Biophysical Model for Predicting the Binding Affinity of Protein–Protein Interaction Inhibitors

[Image: see text] The HADDOCK score, a scoring function for both protein–protein and protein-nucleic acid modeling, has been successful in selecting near-native docking poses in a variety of cases, including those of the CAPRI blind prediction experiment. However, it has yet to be optimized for smal...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kastritis, Panagiotis L., Rodrigues, João P. G. L. M., Bonvin, Alexandre M. J. J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Chemical Society 2014
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3966529/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24521147
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ci4005332
_version_ 1782308924693676032
author Kastritis, Panagiotis L.
Rodrigues, João P. G. L. M.
Bonvin, Alexandre M. J. J.
author_facet Kastritis, Panagiotis L.
Rodrigues, João P. G. L. M.
Bonvin, Alexandre M. J. J.
author_sort Kastritis, Panagiotis L.
collection PubMed
description [Image: see text] The HADDOCK score, a scoring function for both protein–protein and protein-nucleic acid modeling, has been successful in selecting near-native docking poses in a variety of cases, including those of the CAPRI blind prediction experiment. However, it has yet to be optimized for small molecules, and in particular inhibitors of protein–protein interactions, that constitute an “unmined gold reserve” for drug design ventures. We describe here HADDOCK(2P2I), a biophysical model capable of predicting the binding affinity of protein–protein complex inhibitors close to experimental error (∼2-fold larger). The algorithm was trained and 4-fold cross-validated against experimental data for 27 inhibitors targeting 7 protein–protein complexes of various functions and tested on an independent set of 24 different inhibitors for which K(d)/IC50 data are available. In addition, two popular ligand topology generation and parametrization methods (ACPYPE and PRODRG) were assessed. The resulting HADDOCK(2P2I) model, derived from the original HADDOCK score, provides insights into inhibition determinants: while the role of electrostatics and desolvation energies is case-dependent, the interface area plays a more critical role compared to protein–protein interactions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3966529
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher American Chemical Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39665292014-03-27 HADDOCK(2P2I): A Biophysical Model for Predicting the Binding Affinity of Protein–Protein Interaction Inhibitors Kastritis, Panagiotis L. Rodrigues, João P. G. L. M. Bonvin, Alexandre M. J. J. J Chem Inf Model [Image: see text] The HADDOCK score, a scoring function for both protein–protein and protein-nucleic acid modeling, has been successful in selecting near-native docking poses in a variety of cases, including those of the CAPRI blind prediction experiment. However, it has yet to be optimized for small molecules, and in particular inhibitors of protein–protein interactions, that constitute an “unmined gold reserve” for drug design ventures. We describe here HADDOCK(2P2I), a biophysical model capable of predicting the binding affinity of protein–protein complex inhibitors close to experimental error (∼2-fold larger). The algorithm was trained and 4-fold cross-validated against experimental data for 27 inhibitors targeting 7 protein–protein complexes of various functions and tested on an independent set of 24 different inhibitors for which K(d)/IC50 data are available. In addition, two popular ligand topology generation and parametrization methods (ACPYPE and PRODRG) were assessed. The resulting HADDOCK(2P2I) model, derived from the original HADDOCK score, provides insights into inhibition determinants: while the role of electrostatics and desolvation energies is case-dependent, the interface area plays a more critical role compared to protein–protein interactions. American Chemical Society 2014-02-12 2014-03-24 /pmc/articles/PMC3966529/ /pubmed/24521147 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ci4005332 Text en Copyright © 2014 American Chemical Society Terms of Use (http://pubs.acs.org/page/policy/authorchoice_termsofuse.html)
spellingShingle Kastritis, Panagiotis L.
Rodrigues, João P. G. L. M.
Bonvin, Alexandre M. J. J.
HADDOCK(2P2I): A Biophysical Model for Predicting the Binding Affinity of Protein–Protein Interaction Inhibitors
title HADDOCK(2P2I): A Biophysical Model for Predicting the Binding Affinity of Protein–Protein Interaction Inhibitors
title_full HADDOCK(2P2I): A Biophysical Model for Predicting the Binding Affinity of Protein–Protein Interaction Inhibitors
title_fullStr HADDOCK(2P2I): A Biophysical Model for Predicting the Binding Affinity of Protein–Protein Interaction Inhibitors
title_full_unstemmed HADDOCK(2P2I): A Biophysical Model for Predicting the Binding Affinity of Protein–Protein Interaction Inhibitors
title_short HADDOCK(2P2I): A Biophysical Model for Predicting the Binding Affinity of Protein–Protein Interaction Inhibitors
title_sort haddock(2p2i): a biophysical model for predicting the binding affinity of protein–protein interaction inhibitors
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3966529/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24521147
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ci4005332
work_keys_str_mv AT kastritispanagiotisl haddock2p2iabiophysicalmodelforpredictingthebindingaffinityofproteinproteininteractioninhibitors
AT rodriguesjoaopglm haddock2p2iabiophysicalmodelforpredictingthebindingaffinityofproteinproteininteractioninhibitors
AT bonvinalexandremjj haddock2p2iabiophysicalmodelforpredictingthebindingaffinityofproteinproteininteractioninhibitors