Cargando…
A Cognitive Ethology Study of First- and Third-Person Perspectives
The aim of the present study was to test the cognitive ethology approach, which seeks to link cognitions and behaviours as they operate in everyday life with those studied in controlled lab-based investigations. Our test bed was the understanding of first-person and third-person perspectives, which...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3966828/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24671136 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0092696 |
_version_ | 1782308950100672512 |
---|---|
author | Chisholm, Joseph D. Chapman, Craig S. Amm, Marvin Bischof, Walter F. Smilek, Dan Kingstone, Alan |
author_facet | Chisholm, Joseph D. Chapman, Craig S. Amm, Marvin Bischof, Walter F. Smilek, Dan Kingstone, Alan |
author_sort | Chisholm, Joseph D. |
collection | PubMed |
description | The aim of the present study was to test the cognitive ethology approach, which seeks to link cognitions and behaviours as they operate in everyday life with those studied in controlled lab-based investigations. Our test bed was the understanding of first-person and third-person perspectives, which in lab-based investigations have been defined in a diverse and multi-faceted manner. We hypothesized that because these lab-based investigations seek to connect with how first- and third-person perspective operates in everyday life, then either some of the divergent lab-based definitions are missing their mark or the everyday conceptualization of first- and third-person perspective is multi-faceted. Our investigation revealed the latter. By applying a cognitive ethology approach we were able to determine that a) peoples’ everyday understanding of perspective is diverse yet reliable, and b) a lab-based investigation that applies these diverse understandings in a controlled setting can accurately predict how people will perform. These findings provide a ‘proof of concept’ for the cognitive ethology approach. Moreover, the present data demonstrate that previous lab-based studies, that often had very different understandings of first- and third-person perspective, were each in and of themselves valid. That is, each is capturing part of a broader understanding of perspective in everyday life. Our results also revealed a novel social factor not included in traditional conceptualizations of first-person third-perspective, that of eye gaze, i.e., eye contact is equated strongly with first-person perspective and the lack of eye-contact with third-person perspective. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3966828 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-39668282014-03-31 A Cognitive Ethology Study of First- and Third-Person Perspectives Chisholm, Joseph D. Chapman, Craig S. Amm, Marvin Bischof, Walter F. Smilek, Dan Kingstone, Alan PLoS One Research Article The aim of the present study was to test the cognitive ethology approach, which seeks to link cognitions and behaviours as they operate in everyday life with those studied in controlled lab-based investigations. Our test bed was the understanding of first-person and third-person perspectives, which in lab-based investigations have been defined in a diverse and multi-faceted manner. We hypothesized that because these lab-based investigations seek to connect with how first- and third-person perspective operates in everyday life, then either some of the divergent lab-based definitions are missing their mark or the everyday conceptualization of first- and third-person perspective is multi-faceted. Our investigation revealed the latter. By applying a cognitive ethology approach we were able to determine that a) peoples’ everyday understanding of perspective is diverse yet reliable, and b) a lab-based investigation that applies these diverse understandings in a controlled setting can accurately predict how people will perform. These findings provide a ‘proof of concept’ for the cognitive ethology approach. Moreover, the present data demonstrate that previous lab-based studies, that often had very different understandings of first- and third-person perspective, were each in and of themselves valid. That is, each is capturing part of a broader understanding of perspective in everyday life. Our results also revealed a novel social factor not included in traditional conceptualizations of first-person third-perspective, that of eye gaze, i.e., eye contact is equated strongly with first-person perspective and the lack of eye-contact with third-person perspective. Public Library of Science 2014-03-26 /pmc/articles/PMC3966828/ /pubmed/24671136 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0092696 Text en © 2014 Chisholm et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Chisholm, Joseph D. Chapman, Craig S. Amm, Marvin Bischof, Walter F. Smilek, Dan Kingstone, Alan A Cognitive Ethology Study of First- and Third-Person Perspectives |
title | A Cognitive Ethology Study of First- and Third-Person Perspectives |
title_full | A Cognitive Ethology Study of First- and Third-Person Perspectives |
title_fullStr | A Cognitive Ethology Study of First- and Third-Person Perspectives |
title_full_unstemmed | A Cognitive Ethology Study of First- and Third-Person Perspectives |
title_short | A Cognitive Ethology Study of First- and Third-Person Perspectives |
title_sort | cognitive ethology study of first- and third-person perspectives |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3966828/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24671136 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0092696 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chisholmjosephd acognitiveethologystudyoffirstandthirdpersonperspectives AT chapmancraigs acognitiveethologystudyoffirstandthirdpersonperspectives AT ammmarvin acognitiveethologystudyoffirstandthirdpersonperspectives AT bischofwalterf acognitiveethologystudyoffirstandthirdpersonperspectives AT smilekdan acognitiveethologystudyoffirstandthirdpersonperspectives AT kingstonealan acognitiveethologystudyoffirstandthirdpersonperspectives AT chisholmjosephd cognitiveethologystudyoffirstandthirdpersonperspectives AT chapmancraigs cognitiveethologystudyoffirstandthirdpersonperspectives AT ammmarvin cognitiveethologystudyoffirstandthirdpersonperspectives AT bischofwalterf cognitiveethologystudyoffirstandthirdpersonperspectives AT smilekdan cognitiveethologystudyoffirstandthirdpersonperspectives AT kingstonealan cognitiveethologystudyoffirstandthirdpersonperspectives |