Cargando…

Lack of association between vitamin D receptor gene BsmI polymorphism and breast cancer risk: an updated meta-analysis involving 23,020 subjects

The vitamin D receptor (VDR) is a crucial mediator for the cellular effects of vitamin D. A great number of studies regarding the association between BsmI polymorphism in the VDR gene and breast cancer have been published. However, the results have been contradicting. Therefore, we conducted a meta-...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Du, Yingying, Hu, Lixia, Kong, Fanliang, Pan, Yueyin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Netherlands 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3967081/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24248540
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13277-013-1277-y
_version_ 1782308978207752192
author Du, Yingying
Hu, Lixia
Kong, Fanliang
Pan, Yueyin
author_facet Du, Yingying
Hu, Lixia
Kong, Fanliang
Pan, Yueyin
author_sort Du, Yingying
collection PubMed
description The vitamin D receptor (VDR) is a crucial mediator for the cellular effects of vitamin D. A great number of studies regarding the association between BsmI polymorphism in the VDR gene and breast cancer have been published. However, the results have been contradicting. Therefore, we conducted a meta-analysis to re-examine the controversy. Published literatures from PubMed, Embase, and Chinese Biomedical Literature Database (CBM) were searched (updated to July 10, 2013). The principal outcome measure was the odds ratio (OR) with 95 % confidence interval (CI) for breast cancer risk associated with VDR BsmI polymorphism. With all studies involved, the meta-analysis results suggest no statistically significant association between VDR BsmI polymorphism and breast cancer risk (B vs. b, OR = 0.922, 95 % CI = 0.836–1.018, P = 0.108, I (2)  = 80.0 %; BB vs. bb, OR = 0.843, 95 % CI = 0.697–1.021, P = 1.75, I (2)  = 75.5 %; Bb vs. bb, OR = 0.930, 95 % CI = 0.814–1.063, P = 0.31, I (2)  = 73.1 %; BB+Bb vs. bb, OR = 0.906, 95 % CI = 0.787–1.043, P = 1.37, I (2)  = 78.7 %; BB vs. bb+Bb, OR = 0.899, 95 % CI = 0.786–1.028, P = 1.56, I (2)  = 61.0 %). The results were not changed when studies were stratified by ethnicity or source of controls. This meta-analysis suggested that there were no associations between VDR BsmI polymorphism and breast cancer.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3967081
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Springer Netherlands
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39670812014-03-27 Lack of association between vitamin D receptor gene BsmI polymorphism and breast cancer risk: an updated meta-analysis involving 23,020 subjects Du, Yingying Hu, Lixia Kong, Fanliang Pan, Yueyin Tumour Biol Research Article The vitamin D receptor (VDR) is a crucial mediator for the cellular effects of vitamin D. A great number of studies regarding the association between BsmI polymorphism in the VDR gene and breast cancer have been published. However, the results have been contradicting. Therefore, we conducted a meta-analysis to re-examine the controversy. Published literatures from PubMed, Embase, and Chinese Biomedical Literature Database (CBM) were searched (updated to July 10, 2013). The principal outcome measure was the odds ratio (OR) with 95 % confidence interval (CI) for breast cancer risk associated with VDR BsmI polymorphism. With all studies involved, the meta-analysis results suggest no statistically significant association between VDR BsmI polymorphism and breast cancer risk (B vs. b, OR = 0.922, 95 % CI = 0.836–1.018, P = 0.108, I (2)  = 80.0 %; BB vs. bb, OR = 0.843, 95 % CI = 0.697–1.021, P = 1.75, I (2)  = 75.5 %; Bb vs. bb, OR = 0.930, 95 % CI = 0.814–1.063, P = 0.31, I (2)  = 73.1 %; BB+Bb vs. bb, OR = 0.906, 95 % CI = 0.787–1.043, P = 1.37, I (2)  = 78.7 %; BB vs. bb+Bb, OR = 0.899, 95 % CI = 0.786–1.028, P = 1.56, I (2)  = 61.0 %). The results were not changed when studies were stratified by ethnicity or source of controls. This meta-analysis suggested that there were no associations between VDR BsmI polymorphism and breast cancer. Springer Netherlands 2013-11-20 /pmc/articles/PMC3967081/ /pubmed/24248540 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13277-013-1277-y Text en © The Author(s) 2013 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/ Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits any use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Du, Yingying
Hu, Lixia
Kong, Fanliang
Pan, Yueyin
Lack of association between vitamin D receptor gene BsmI polymorphism and breast cancer risk: an updated meta-analysis involving 23,020 subjects
title Lack of association between vitamin D receptor gene BsmI polymorphism and breast cancer risk: an updated meta-analysis involving 23,020 subjects
title_full Lack of association between vitamin D receptor gene BsmI polymorphism and breast cancer risk: an updated meta-analysis involving 23,020 subjects
title_fullStr Lack of association between vitamin D receptor gene BsmI polymorphism and breast cancer risk: an updated meta-analysis involving 23,020 subjects
title_full_unstemmed Lack of association between vitamin D receptor gene BsmI polymorphism and breast cancer risk: an updated meta-analysis involving 23,020 subjects
title_short Lack of association between vitamin D receptor gene BsmI polymorphism and breast cancer risk: an updated meta-analysis involving 23,020 subjects
title_sort lack of association between vitamin d receptor gene bsmi polymorphism and breast cancer risk: an updated meta-analysis involving 23,020 subjects
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3967081/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24248540
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13277-013-1277-y
work_keys_str_mv AT duyingying lackofassociationbetweenvitamindreceptorgenebsmipolymorphismandbreastcancerriskanupdatedmetaanalysisinvolving23020subjects
AT hulixia lackofassociationbetweenvitamindreceptorgenebsmipolymorphismandbreastcancerriskanupdatedmetaanalysisinvolving23020subjects
AT kongfanliang lackofassociationbetweenvitamindreceptorgenebsmipolymorphismandbreastcancerriskanupdatedmetaanalysisinvolving23020subjects
AT panyueyin lackofassociationbetweenvitamindreceptorgenebsmipolymorphismandbreastcancerriskanupdatedmetaanalysisinvolving23020subjects