Cargando…
Lack of association between vitamin D receptor gene BsmI polymorphism and breast cancer risk: an updated meta-analysis involving 23,020 subjects
The vitamin D receptor (VDR) is a crucial mediator for the cellular effects of vitamin D. A great number of studies regarding the association between BsmI polymorphism in the VDR gene and breast cancer have been published. However, the results have been contradicting. Therefore, we conducted a meta-...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Netherlands
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3967081/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24248540 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13277-013-1277-y |
_version_ | 1782308978207752192 |
---|---|
author | Du, Yingying Hu, Lixia Kong, Fanliang Pan, Yueyin |
author_facet | Du, Yingying Hu, Lixia Kong, Fanliang Pan, Yueyin |
author_sort | Du, Yingying |
collection | PubMed |
description | The vitamin D receptor (VDR) is a crucial mediator for the cellular effects of vitamin D. A great number of studies regarding the association between BsmI polymorphism in the VDR gene and breast cancer have been published. However, the results have been contradicting. Therefore, we conducted a meta-analysis to re-examine the controversy. Published literatures from PubMed, Embase, and Chinese Biomedical Literature Database (CBM) were searched (updated to July 10, 2013). The principal outcome measure was the odds ratio (OR) with 95 % confidence interval (CI) for breast cancer risk associated with VDR BsmI polymorphism. With all studies involved, the meta-analysis results suggest no statistically significant association between VDR BsmI polymorphism and breast cancer risk (B vs. b, OR = 0.922, 95 % CI = 0.836–1.018, P = 0.108, I (2) = 80.0 %; BB vs. bb, OR = 0.843, 95 % CI = 0.697–1.021, P = 1.75, I (2) = 75.5 %; Bb vs. bb, OR = 0.930, 95 % CI = 0.814–1.063, P = 0.31, I (2) = 73.1 %; BB+Bb vs. bb, OR = 0.906, 95 % CI = 0.787–1.043, P = 1.37, I (2) = 78.7 %; BB vs. bb+Bb, OR = 0.899, 95 % CI = 0.786–1.028, P = 1.56, I (2) = 61.0 %). The results were not changed when studies were stratified by ethnicity or source of controls. This meta-analysis suggested that there were no associations between VDR BsmI polymorphism and breast cancer. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3967081 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Springer Netherlands |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-39670812014-03-27 Lack of association between vitamin D receptor gene BsmI polymorphism and breast cancer risk: an updated meta-analysis involving 23,020 subjects Du, Yingying Hu, Lixia Kong, Fanliang Pan, Yueyin Tumour Biol Research Article The vitamin D receptor (VDR) is a crucial mediator for the cellular effects of vitamin D. A great number of studies regarding the association between BsmI polymorphism in the VDR gene and breast cancer have been published. However, the results have been contradicting. Therefore, we conducted a meta-analysis to re-examine the controversy. Published literatures from PubMed, Embase, and Chinese Biomedical Literature Database (CBM) were searched (updated to July 10, 2013). The principal outcome measure was the odds ratio (OR) with 95 % confidence interval (CI) for breast cancer risk associated with VDR BsmI polymorphism. With all studies involved, the meta-analysis results suggest no statistically significant association between VDR BsmI polymorphism and breast cancer risk (B vs. b, OR = 0.922, 95 % CI = 0.836–1.018, P = 0.108, I (2) = 80.0 %; BB vs. bb, OR = 0.843, 95 % CI = 0.697–1.021, P = 1.75, I (2) = 75.5 %; Bb vs. bb, OR = 0.930, 95 % CI = 0.814–1.063, P = 0.31, I (2) = 73.1 %; BB+Bb vs. bb, OR = 0.906, 95 % CI = 0.787–1.043, P = 1.37, I (2) = 78.7 %; BB vs. bb+Bb, OR = 0.899, 95 % CI = 0.786–1.028, P = 1.56, I (2) = 61.0 %). The results were not changed when studies were stratified by ethnicity or source of controls. This meta-analysis suggested that there were no associations between VDR BsmI polymorphism and breast cancer. Springer Netherlands 2013-11-20 /pmc/articles/PMC3967081/ /pubmed/24248540 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13277-013-1277-y Text en © The Author(s) 2013 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/ Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits any use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Du, Yingying Hu, Lixia Kong, Fanliang Pan, Yueyin Lack of association between vitamin D receptor gene BsmI polymorphism and breast cancer risk: an updated meta-analysis involving 23,020 subjects |
title | Lack of association between vitamin D receptor gene BsmI polymorphism and breast cancer risk: an updated meta-analysis involving 23,020 subjects |
title_full | Lack of association between vitamin D receptor gene BsmI polymorphism and breast cancer risk: an updated meta-analysis involving 23,020 subjects |
title_fullStr | Lack of association between vitamin D receptor gene BsmI polymorphism and breast cancer risk: an updated meta-analysis involving 23,020 subjects |
title_full_unstemmed | Lack of association between vitamin D receptor gene BsmI polymorphism and breast cancer risk: an updated meta-analysis involving 23,020 subjects |
title_short | Lack of association between vitamin D receptor gene BsmI polymorphism and breast cancer risk: an updated meta-analysis involving 23,020 subjects |
title_sort | lack of association between vitamin d receptor gene bsmi polymorphism and breast cancer risk: an updated meta-analysis involving 23,020 subjects |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3967081/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24248540 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13277-013-1277-y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT duyingying lackofassociationbetweenvitamindreceptorgenebsmipolymorphismandbreastcancerriskanupdatedmetaanalysisinvolving23020subjects AT hulixia lackofassociationbetweenvitamindreceptorgenebsmipolymorphismandbreastcancerriskanupdatedmetaanalysisinvolving23020subjects AT kongfanliang lackofassociationbetweenvitamindreceptorgenebsmipolymorphismandbreastcancerriskanupdatedmetaanalysisinvolving23020subjects AT panyueyin lackofassociationbetweenvitamindreceptorgenebsmipolymorphismandbreastcancerriskanupdatedmetaanalysisinvolving23020subjects |