Cargando…

Where is the neck?: Alpha angle measurement revisited

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The alpha angle is the most used measurement to classify concavity of the femoral head-neck junction. It is not only used for treatment decisions for hip impingement, but also in cohort studies relating hip morphology and osteoarthritis. Alpha angle measurement requires ident...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bouma, Heinse, Slot, Niels-Jan, Toogood, Paul, Pollard, Tom, van Kampen, Paulien, Hogervorst, Tom
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Informa Healthcare 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3967256/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24650023
http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/17453674.2014.899841
_version_ 1782309010295226368
author Bouma, Heinse
Slot, Niels-Jan
Toogood, Paul
Pollard, Tom
van Kampen, Paulien
Hogervorst, Tom
author_facet Bouma, Heinse
Slot, Niels-Jan
Toogood, Paul
Pollard, Tom
van Kampen, Paulien
Hogervorst, Tom
author_sort Bouma, Heinse
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The alpha angle is the most used measurement to classify concavity of the femoral head-neck junction. It is not only used for treatment decisions for hip impingement, but also in cohort studies relating hip morphology and osteoarthritis. Alpha angle measurement requires identification of the femoral neck axis, the definition of which may vary between studies. The original “3-point method” uses 1 single point to construct the femoral neck axis, whereas the “anatomic method” uses multiple points and attempts to define the true anatomic neck axis. Depending on the method used, the alpha angle may or may not account for other morphological characteristics such as head-neck offset. METHODS: We compared 2 methods of alpha angle measurement (termed “anatomic” and “3-point”) in 59 cadaver femora and 83 cross-table lateral radiographs of asymptomatic subjects. Results were compared using Bland-Altman plots. RESULTS: Discrepancies of up to 13 degrees were seen between the methods. The 3-point method had an “equalizing effect” by disregarding femoral head position relative to the neck: in femora with high alpha angle, it resulted in lower values than anatomic measurement, and vice versa in femora with low alpha angles. Using the anatomic method, we derived a reference interval for the alpha angle in normal hips in the general population of 30–66 degrees. INTERPRETATION: We recommend the anatomic method because it also reflects the position of the femoral head on the neck. Consensus and standardization of technique of alpha angle measurement is warranted, not only for planar measurements but also for CT or MRI-based measurements.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3967256
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Informa Healthcare
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39672562014-04-03 Where is the neck?: Alpha angle measurement revisited Bouma, Heinse Slot, Niels-Jan Toogood, Paul Pollard, Tom van Kampen, Paulien Hogervorst, Tom Acta Orthop Hip and Knee BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The alpha angle is the most used measurement to classify concavity of the femoral head-neck junction. It is not only used for treatment decisions for hip impingement, but also in cohort studies relating hip morphology and osteoarthritis. Alpha angle measurement requires identification of the femoral neck axis, the definition of which may vary between studies. The original “3-point method” uses 1 single point to construct the femoral neck axis, whereas the “anatomic method” uses multiple points and attempts to define the true anatomic neck axis. Depending on the method used, the alpha angle may or may not account for other morphological characteristics such as head-neck offset. METHODS: We compared 2 methods of alpha angle measurement (termed “anatomic” and “3-point”) in 59 cadaver femora and 83 cross-table lateral radiographs of asymptomatic subjects. Results were compared using Bland-Altman plots. RESULTS: Discrepancies of up to 13 degrees were seen between the methods. The 3-point method had an “equalizing effect” by disregarding femoral head position relative to the neck: in femora with high alpha angle, it resulted in lower values than anatomic measurement, and vice versa in femora with low alpha angles. Using the anatomic method, we derived a reference interval for the alpha angle in normal hips in the general population of 30–66 degrees. INTERPRETATION: We recommend the anatomic method because it also reflects the position of the femoral head on the neck. Consensus and standardization of technique of alpha angle measurement is warranted, not only for planar measurements but also for CT or MRI-based measurements. Informa Healthcare 2014-04 2014-03-20 /pmc/articles/PMC3967256/ /pubmed/24650023 http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/17453674.2014.899841 Text en Copyright: © Nordic Orthopaedic Federation http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the source is credited.
spellingShingle Hip and Knee
Bouma, Heinse
Slot, Niels-Jan
Toogood, Paul
Pollard, Tom
van Kampen, Paulien
Hogervorst, Tom
Where is the neck?: Alpha angle measurement revisited
title Where is the neck?: Alpha angle measurement revisited
title_full Where is the neck?: Alpha angle measurement revisited
title_fullStr Where is the neck?: Alpha angle measurement revisited
title_full_unstemmed Where is the neck?: Alpha angle measurement revisited
title_short Where is the neck?: Alpha angle measurement revisited
title_sort where is the neck?: alpha angle measurement revisited
topic Hip and Knee
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3967256/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24650023
http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/17453674.2014.899841
work_keys_str_mv AT boumaheinse whereistheneckalphaanglemeasurementrevisited
AT slotnielsjan whereistheneckalphaanglemeasurementrevisited
AT toogoodpaul whereistheneckalphaanglemeasurementrevisited
AT pollardtom whereistheneckalphaanglemeasurementrevisited
AT vankampenpaulien whereistheneckalphaanglemeasurementrevisited
AT hogervorsttom whereistheneckalphaanglemeasurementrevisited