Cargando…
Small and similar amounts of micromotion in an anatomical stem and a customized cementless femoral stem in regular-shaped femurs: A 5-year follow-up randomized RSA study
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: High primary stability is important for long-term survival of uncemented femoral stems. Different stem designs are currently in use. The ABG-I is a well-documented anatomical stem with a press-fit design. The Unique stem is designed for a tight customized fit to the cortical...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Informa Healthcare
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3967257/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24650024 http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/17453674.2014.899846 |
_version_ | 1782309010523815936 |
---|---|
author | Nysted, Mona Foss, Olav A Klaksvik, Jomar Benum, Pål Haugan, Kristin Husby, Otto Schnell Aamodt, Arild |
author_facet | Nysted, Mona Foss, Olav A Klaksvik, Jomar Benum, Pål Haugan, Kristin Husby, Otto Schnell Aamodt, Arild |
author_sort | Nysted, Mona |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: High primary stability is important for long-term survival of uncemented femoral stems. Different stem designs are currently in use. The ABG-I is a well-documented anatomical stem with a press-fit design. The Unique stem is designed for a tight customized fit to the cortical bone of the upper femur. This implant was initially developed for patients with abnormal anatomy, but the concept can also be used in patients with normal femoral anatomy. We present 5-year radiostereometric analysis (RSA) results from a randomized study comparing the ABG-I anatomical stem with the Unique femoral stem. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 100 hips with regular upper femur anatomy were randomized to either the ABG-I stem or the Unique femoral stem. RSA measurements were performed postoperatively and after 3, 6, 12, 24, and 60 months. RESULTS: RSA measurements from 80 hips were available for analysis at the 5-year follow-up. Small amounts of movement were observed for both stems, with no statistically significant differences between the 2 types. INTERPRETATION: No improvement in long-term stability was found from using a customized stem design. However, no patients with abnormal geometry of the upper femur were included in this study. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3967257 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Informa Healthcare |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-39672572014-04-03 Small and similar amounts of micromotion in an anatomical stem and a customized cementless femoral stem in regular-shaped femurs: A 5-year follow-up randomized RSA study Nysted, Mona Foss, Olav A Klaksvik, Jomar Benum, Pål Haugan, Kristin Husby, Otto Schnell Aamodt, Arild Acta Orthop Hip and Knee BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: High primary stability is important for long-term survival of uncemented femoral stems. Different stem designs are currently in use. The ABG-I is a well-documented anatomical stem with a press-fit design. The Unique stem is designed for a tight customized fit to the cortical bone of the upper femur. This implant was initially developed for patients with abnormal anatomy, but the concept can also be used in patients with normal femoral anatomy. We present 5-year radiostereometric analysis (RSA) results from a randomized study comparing the ABG-I anatomical stem with the Unique femoral stem. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 100 hips with regular upper femur anatomy were randomized to either the ABG-I stem or the Unique femoral stem. RSA measurements were performed postoperatively and after 3, 6, 12, 24, and 60 months. RESULTS: RSA measurements from 80 hips were available for analysis at the 5-year follow-up. Small amounts of movement were observed for both stems, with no statistically significant differences between the 2 types. INTERPRETATION: No improvement in long-term stability was found from using a customized stem design. However, no patients with abnormal geometry of the upper femur were included in this study. Informa Healthcare 2014-04 2014-03-20 /pmc/articles/PMC3967257/ /pubmed/24650024 http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/17453674.2014.899846 Text en Copyright: © Nordic Orthopaedic Federation http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the source is credited. |
spellingShingle | Hip and Knee Nysted, Mona Foss, Olav A Klaksvik, Jomar Benum, Pål Haugan, Kristin Husby, Otto Schnell Aamodt, Arild Small and similar amounts of micromotion in an anatomical stem and a customized cementless femoral stem in regular-shaped femurs: A 5-year follow-up randomized RSA study |
title | Small and similar amounts of micromotion in an anatomical stem and a customized cementless femoral stem in regular-shaped femurs: A 5-year follow-up randomized RSA study |
title_full | Small and similar amounts of micromotion in an anatomical stem and a customized cementless femoral stem in regular-shaped femurs: A 5-year follow-up randomized RSA study |
title_fullStr | Small and similar amounts of micromotion in an anatomical stem and a customized cementless femoral stem in regular-shaped femurs: A 5-year follow-up randomized RSA study |
title_full_unstemmed | Small and similar amounts of micromotion in an anatomical stem and a customized cementless femoral stem in regular-shaped femurs: A 5-year follow-up randomized RSA study |
title_short | Small and similar amounts of micromotion in an anatomical stem and a customized cementless femoral stem in regular-shaped femurs: A 5-year follow-up randomized RSA study |
title_sort | small and similar amounts of micromotion in an anatomical stem and a customized cementless femoral stem in regular-shaped femurs: a 5-year follow-up randomized rsa study |
topic | Hip and Knee |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3967257/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24650024 http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/17453674.2014.899846 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT nystedmona smallandsimilaramountsofmicromotioninananatomicalstemandacustomizedcementlessfemoralsteminregularshapedfemursa5yearfollowuprandomizedrsastudy AT fossolava smallandsimilaramountsofmicromotioninananatomicalstemandacustomizedcementlessfemoralsteminregularshapedfemursa5yearfollowuprandomizedrsastudy AT klaksvikjomar smallandsimilaramountsofmicromotioninananatomicalstemandacustomizedcementlessfemoralsteminregularshapedfemursa5yearfollowuprandomizedrsastudy AT benumpal smallandsimilaramountsofmicromotioninananatomicalstemandacustomizedcementlessfemoralsteminregularshapedfemursa5yearfollowuprandomizedrsastudy AT haugankristin smallandsimilaramountsofmicromotioninananatomicalstemandacustomizedcementlessfemoralsteminregularshapedfemursa5yearfollowuprandomizedrsastudy AT husbyottoschnell smallandsimilaramountsofmicromotioninananatomicalstemandacustomizedcementlessfemoralsteminregularshapedfemursa5yearfollowuprandomizedrsastudy AT aamodtarild smallandsimilaramountsofmicromotioninananatomicalstemandacustomizedcementlessfemoralsteminregularshapedfemursa5yearfollowuprandomizedrsastudy |