Cargando…

Small and similar amounts of micromotion in an anatomical stem and a customized cementless femoral stem in regular-shaped femurs: A 5-year follow-up randomized RSA study

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: High primary stability is important for long-term survival of uncemented femoral stems. Different stem designs are currently in use. The ABG-I is a well-documented anatomical stem with a press-fit design. The Unique stem is designed for a tight customized fit to the cortical...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nysted, Mona, Foss, Olav A, Klaksvik, Jomar, Benum, Pål, Haugan, Kristin, Husby, Otto Schnell, Aamodt, Arild
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Informa Healthcare 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3967257/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24650024
http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/17453674.2014.899846
_version_ 1782309010523815936
author Nysted, Mona
Foss, Olav A
Klaksvik, Jomar
Benum, Pål
Haugan, Kristin
Husby, Otto Schnell
Aamodt, Arild
author_facet Nysted, Mona
Foss, Olav A
Klaksvik, Jomar
Benum, Pål
Haugan, Kristin
Husby, Otto Schnell
Aamodt, Arild
author_sort Nysted, Mona
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: High primary stability is important for long-term survival of uncemented femoral stems. Different stem designs are currently in use. The ABG-I is a well-documented anatomical stem with a press-fit design. The Unique stem is designed for a tight customized fit to the cortical bone of the upper femur. This implant was initially developed for patients with abnormal anatomy, but the concept can also be used in patients with normal femoral anatomy. We present 5-year radiostereometric analysis (RSA) results from a randomized study comparing the ABG-I anatomical stem with the Unique femoral stem. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 100 hips with regular upper femur anatomy were randomized to either the ABG-I stem or the Unique femoral stem. RSA measurements were performed postoperatively and after 3, 6, 12, 24, and 60 months. RESULTS: RSA measurements from 80 hips were available for analysis at the 5-year follow-up. Small amounts of movement were observed for both stems, with no statistically significant differences between the 2 types. INTERPRETATION: No improvement in long-term stability was found from using a customized stem design. However, no patients with abnormal geometry of the upper femur were included in this study.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3967257
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Informa Healthcare
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39672572014-04-03 Small and similar amounts of micromotion in an anatomical stem and a customized cementless femoral stem in regular-shaped femurs: A 5-year follow-up randomized RSA study Nysted, Mona Foss, Olav A Klaksvik, Jomar Benum, Pål Haugan, Kristin Husby, Otto Schnell Aamodt, Arild Acta Orthop Hip and Knee BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: High primary stability is important for long-term survival of uncemented femoral stems. Different stem designs are currently in use. The ABG-I is a well-documented anatomical stem with a press-fit design. The Unique stem is designed for a tight customized fit to the cortical bone of the upper femur. This implant was initially developed for patients with abnormal anatomy, but the concept can also be used in patients with normal femoral anatomy. We present 5-year radiostereometric analysis (RSA) results from a randomized study comparing the ABG-I anatomical stem with the Unique femoral stem. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 100 hips with regular upper femur anatomy were randomized to either the ABG-I stem or the Unique femoral stem. RSA measurements were performed postoperatively and after 3, 6, 12, 24, and 60 months. RESULTS: RSA measurements from 80 hips were available for analysis at the 5-year follow-up. Small amounts of movement were observed for both stems, with no statistically significant differences between the 2 types. INTERPRETATION: No improvement in long-term stability was found from using a customized stem design. However, no patients with abnormal geometry of the upper femur were included in this study. Informa Healthcare 2014-04 2014-03-20 /pmc/articles/PMC3967257/ /pubmed/24650024 http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/17453674.2014.899846 Text en Copyright: © Nordic Orthopaedic Federation http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the source is credited.
spellingShingle Hip and Knee
Nysted, Mona
Foss, Olav A
Klaksvik, Jomar
Benum, Pål
Haugan, Kristin
Husby, Otto Schnell
Aamodt, Arild
Small and similar amounts of micromotion in an anatomical stem and a customized cementless femoral stem in regular-shaped femurs: A 5-year follow-up randomized RSA study
title Small and similar amounts of micromotion in an anatomical stem and a customized cementless femoral stem in regular-shaped femurs: A 5-year follow-up randomized RSA study
title_full Small and similar amounts of micromotion in an anatomical stem and a customized cementless femoral stem in regular-shaped femurs: A 5-year follow-up randomized RSA study
title_fullStr Small and similar amounts of micromotion in an anatomical stem and a customized cementless femoral stem in regular-shaped femurs: A 5-year follow-up randomized RSA study
title_full_unstemmed Small and similar amounts of micromotion in an anatomical stem and a customized cementless femoral stem in regular-shaped femurs: A 5-year follow-up randomized RSA study
title_short Small and similar amounts of micromotion in an anatomical stem and a customized cementless femoral stem in regular-shaped femurs: A 5-year follow-up randomized RSA study
title_sort small and similar amounts of micromotion in an anatomical stem and a customized cementless femoral stem in regular-shaped femurs: a 5-year follow-up randomized rsa study
topic Hip and Knee
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3967257/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24650024
http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/17453674.2014.899846
work_keys_str_mv AT nystedmona smallandsimilaramountsofmicromotioninananatomicalstemandacustomizedcementlessfemoralsteminregularshapedfemursa5yearfollowuprandomizedrsastudy
AT fossolava smallandsimilaramountsofmicromotioninananatomicalstemandacustomizedcementlessfemoralsteminregularshapedfemursa5yearfollowuprandomizedrsastudy
AT klaksvikjomar smallandsimilaramountsofmicromotioninananatomicalstemandacustomizedcementlessfemoralsteminregularshapedfemursa5yearfollowuprandomizedrsastudy
AT benumpal smallandsimilaramountsofmicromotioninananatomicalstemandacustomizedcementlessfemoralsteminregularshapedfemursa5yearfollowuprandomizedrsastudy
AT haugankristin smallandsimilaramountsofmicromotioninananatomicalstemandacustomizedcementlessfemoralsteminregularshapedfemursa5yearfollowuprandomizedrsastudy
AT husbyottoschnell smallandsimilaramountsofmicromotioninananatomicalstemandacustomizedcementlessfemoralsteminregularshapedfemursa5yearfollowuprandomizedrsastudy
AT aamodtarild smallandsimilaramountsofmicromotioninananatomicalstemandacustomizedcementlessfemoralsteminregularshapedfemursa5yearfollowuprandomizedrsastudy