Cargando…

Hip-inspired implant for revision of failed reverse shoulder arthroplasty with severe glenoid bone loss: Improved clinical outcome in 11 patients at 3-year follow-up

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Glenoid reconstruction and inverted glenoid re-implantation is strongly advocated in revisions of failed reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA). Nevertheless, severe glenoid deficiency may preclude glenoid reconstruction and may dictate less favorable solutions, such as conversi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Uri, Ofir, Bayley, Ian, Lambert, Simon
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Informa Healthcare 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3967260/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24650026
http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/17453674.2014.899850
_version_ 1782309011197001728
author Uri, Ofir
Bayley, Ian
Lambert, Simon
author_facet Uri, Ofir
Bayley, Ian
Lambert, Simon
author_sort Uri, Ofir
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Glenoid reconstruction and inverted glenoid re-implantation is strongly advocated in revisions of failed reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA). Nevertheless, severe glenoid deficiency may preclude glenoid reconstruction and may dictate less favorable solutions, such as conversion to hemiarthropasty or resection arthropasty. The CAD/CAM shoulder (Stanmore Implants, Elstree, UK), a hip arthroplasty-inspired implant, may facilitate glenoid component fixation in these challenging revisions where glenoid reconstruction is not feasible. We questioned (1) whether revision arthroplasty with the CAD/CAM shoulder would alleviate pain and improve shoulder function in patients with failed RSA, not amenable to glenoid reconstruction, (2) whether the CAD/CAM hip-inspired glenoid shell would enable secure and durable glenoid component fixation in these challenging revisions. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 11 patients with failed RSAs and unreconstructable glenoids underwent revision with the CAD/CAM shoulder and were followed-up for mean 35 (28–42) months. Clinical outcomes included the Oxford shoulder score, subjective shoulder value, pain rating, physical examination, and shoulder radiographs. RESULTS: The average Oxford shoulder score and subjective shoulder value improved statistically significantly after the revision from 50 to 33 points and from 17% to 48% respectively. Pain rating at rest and during activity improved significantly from 5.3 to 2.3 and from 8.1 to 3.8 respectively. Active forward flexion increased from 25 to 54 degrees and external rotation increased from 9 to 21 degrees. 4 patients required reoperation for postoperative complications. No cases of glenoid loosening occurred. INTERPRETATION: The CAD/CAM shoulder offers an alternative solution for the treatment of failed RSA that is not amenable to glenoid reconstruction.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3967260
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Informa Healthcare
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39672602014-04-03 Hip-inspired implant for revision of failed reverse shoulder arthroplasty with severe glenoid bone loss: Improved clinical outcome in 11 patients at 3-year follow-up Uri, Ofir Bayley, Ian Lambert, Simon Acta Orthop Upper Extremity BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Glenoid reconstruction and inverted glenoid re-implantation is strongly advocated in revisions of failed reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA). Nevertheless, severe glenoid deficiency may preclude glenoid reconstruction and may dictate less favorable solutions, such as conversion to hemiarthropasty or resection arthropasty. The CAD/CAM shoulder (Stanmore Implants, Elstree, UK), a hip arthroplasty-inspired implant, may facilitate glenoid component fixation in these challenging revisions where glenoid reconstruction is not feasible. We questioned (1) whether revision arthroplasty with the CAD/CAM shoulder would alleviate pain and improve shoulder function in patients with failed RSA, not amenable to glenoid reconstruction, (2) whether the CAD/CAM hip-inspired glenoid shell would enable secure and durable glenoid component fixation in these challenging revisions. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 11 patients with failed RSAs and unreconstructable glenoids underwent revision with the CAD/CAM shoulder and were followed-up for mean 35 (28–42) months. Clinical outcomes included the Oxford shoulder score, subjective shoulder value, pain rating, physical examination, and shoulder radiographs. RESULTS: The average Oxford shoulder score and subjective shoulder value improved statistically significantly after the revision from 50 to 33 points and from 17% to 48% respectively. Pain rating at rest and during activity improved significantly from 5.3 to 2.3 and from 8.1 to 3.8 respectively. Active forward flexion increased from 25 to 54 degrees and external rotation increased from 9 to 21 degrees. 4 patients required reoperation for postoperative complications. No cases of glenoid loosening occurred. INTERPRETATION: The CAD/CAM shoulder offers an alternative solution for the treatment of failed RSA that is not amenable to glenoid reconstruction. Informa Healthcare 2014-04 2014-03-20 /pmc/articles/PMC3967260/ /pubmed/24650026 http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/17453674.2014.899850 Text en Copyright: © Nordic Orthopaedic Federation http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the source is credited.
spellingShingle Upper Extremity
Uri, Ofir
Bayley, Ian
Lambert, Simon
Hip-inspired implant for revision of failed reverse shoulder arthroplasty with severe glenoid bone loss: Improved clinical outcome in 11 patients at 3-year follow-up
title Hip-inspired implant for revision of failed reverse shoulder arthroplasty with severe glenoid bone loss: Improved clinical outcome in 11 patients at 3-year follow-up
title_full Hip-inspired implant for revision of failed reverse shoulder arthroplasty with severe glenoid bone loss: Improved clinical outcome in 11 patients at 3-year follow-up
title_fullStr Hip-inspired implant for revision of failed reverse shoulder arthroplasty with severe glenoid bone loss: Improved clinical outcome in 11 patients at 3-year follow-up
title_full_unstemmed Hip-inspired implant for revision of failed reverse shoulder arthroplasty with severe glenoid bone loss: Improved clinical outcome in 11 patients at 3-year follow-up
title_short Hip-inspired implant for revision of failed reverse shoulder arthroplasty with severe glenoid bone loss: Improved clinical outcome in 11 patients at 3-year follow-up
title_sort hip-inspired implant for revision of failed reverse shoulder arthroplasty with severe glenoid bone loss: improved clinical outcome in 11 patients at 3-year follow-up
topic Upper Extremity
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3967260/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24650026
http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/17453674.2014.899850
work_keys_str_mv AT uriofir hipinspiredimplantforrevisionoffailedreverseshoulderarthroplastywithsevereglenoidbonelossimprovedclinicaloutcomein11patientsat3yearfollowup
AT bayleyian hipinspiredimplantforrevisionoffailedreverseshoulderarthroplastywithsevereglenoidbonelossimprovedclinicaloutcomein11patientsat3yearfollowup
AT lambertsimon hipinspiredimplantforrevisionoffailedreverseshoulderarthroplastywithsevereglenoidbonelossimprovedclinicaloutcomein11patientsat3yearfollowup