Cargando…
The growth of Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli in low-direct current electric fields
Electrical potentials up to 800 mV can be observed between different metallic dental restorations. These potentials produce fields in the mouth that may interfere with microbial communities. The present study focuses on the impact of different electric field strengths (EFS) on the growth of Staphylo...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3967302/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24008271 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ijos.2013.64 |
_version_ | 1782309013446197248 |
---|---|
author | Zituni, Dunya Schütt-Gerowitt, Heidi Kopp, Marion Krönke, Martin Addicks, Klaus Hoffmann, Christian Hellmich, Martin Faber, Franz Niedermeier, Wilhelm |
author_facet | Zituni, Dunya Schütt-Gerowitt, Heidi Kopp, Marion Krönke, Martin Addicks, Klaus Hoffmann, Christian Hellmich, Martin Faber, Franz Niedermeier, Wilhelm |
author_sort | Zituni, Dunya |
collection | PubMed |
description | Electrical potentials up to 800 mV can be observed between different metallic dental restorations. These potentials produce fields in the mouth that may interfere with microbial communities. The present study focuses on the impact of different electric field strengths (EFS) on the growth of Staphylococcus aureus (ATCC 25923) and Escherichia coli (ATCC 25922) in vitro. Cultures of S. aureus and E. coli in fluid and gel medium were exposed to different EFS. Effects were determined by calculation of viable counts and measurement of inhibition zones. In gel medium, anodic inhibition zones for S. aureus were larger than those for E. coli at all field strength levels. In fluid medium, the maximum decrease in the viable count of S. aureus cells was at 10 V⋅m(−1). Field-treated S. aureus cells presented ruptured cell walls and disintegrated cytoplasm. Conclusively, S. aureus is more sensitive to increasing electric field strength than E. coli. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3967302 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-39673022014-03-27 The growth of Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli in low-direct current electric fields Zituni, Dunya Schütt-Gerowitt, Heidi Kopp, Marion Krönke, Martin Addicks, Klaus Hoffmann, Christian Hellmich, Martin Faber, Franz Niedermeier, Wilhelm Int J Oral Sci Original Article Electrical potentials up to 800 mV can be observed between different metallic dental restorations. These potentials produce fields in the mouth that may interfere with microbial communities. The present study focuses on the impact of different electric field strengths (EFS) on the growth of Staphylococcus aureus (ATCC 25923) and Escherichia coli (ATCC 25922) in vitro. Cultures of S. aureus and E. coli in fluid and gel medium were exposed to different EFS. Effects were determined by calculation of viable counts and measurement of inhibition zones. In gel medium, anodic inhibition zones for S. aureus were larger than those for E. coli at all field strength levels. In fluid medium, the maximum decrease in the viable count of S. aureus cells was at 10 V⋅m(−1). Field-treated S. aureus cells presented ruptured cell walls and disintegrated cytoplasm. Conclusively, S. aureus is more sensitive to increasing electric field strength than E. coli. Nature Publishing Group 2014-03 2013-09-06 /pmc/articles/PMC3967302/ /pubmed/24008271 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ijos.2013.64 Text en Copyright © 2013 West China School of Stomatology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ |
spellingShingle | Original Article Zituni, Dunya Schütt-Gerowitt, Heidi Kopp, Marion Krönke, Martin Addicks, Klaus Hoffmann, Christian Hellmich, Martin Faber, Franz Niedermeier, Wilhelm The growth of Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli in low-direct current electric fields |
title | The growth of Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli in low-direct current electric fields |
title_full | The growth of Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli in low-direct current electric fields |
title_fullStr | The growth of Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli in low-direct current electric fields |
title_full_unstemmed | The growth of Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli in low-direct current electric fields |
title_short | The growth of Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli in low-direct current electric fields |
title_sort | growth of staphylococcus aureus and escherichia coli in low-direct current electric fields |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3967302/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24008271 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ijos.2013.64 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zitunidunya thegrowthofstaphylococcusaureusandescherichiacoliinlowdirectcurrentelectricfields AT schuttgerowittheidi thegrowthofstaphylococcusaureusandescherichiacoliinlowdirectcurrentelectricfields AT koppmarion thegrowthofstaphylococcusaureusandescherichiacoliinlowdirectcurrentelectricfields AT kronkemartin thegrowthofstaphylococcusaureusandescherichiacoliinlowdirectcurrentelectricfields AT addicksklaus thegrowthofstaphylococcusaureusandescherichiacoliinlowdirectcurrentelectricfields AT hoffmannchristian thegrowthofstaphylococcusaureusandescherichiacoliinlowdirectcurrentelectricfields AT hellmichmartin thegrowthofstaphylococcusaureusandescherichiacoliinlowdirectcurrentelectricfields AT faberfranz thegrowthofstaphylococcusaureusandescherichiacoliinlowdirectcurrentelectricfields AT niedermeierwilhelm thegrowthofstaphylococcusaureusandescherichiacoliinlowdirectcurrentelectricfields AT zitunidunya growthofstaphylococcusaureusandescherichiacoliinlowdirectcurrentelectricfields AT schuttgerowittheidi growthofstaphylococcusaureusandescherichiacoliinlowdirectcurrentelectricfields AT koppmarion growthofstaphylococcusaureusandescherichiacoliinlowdirectcurrentelectricfields AT kronkemartin growthofstaphylococcusaureusandescherichiacoliinlowdirectcurrentelectricfields AT addicksklaus growthofstaphylococcusaureusandescherichiacoliinlowdirectcurrentelectricfields AT hoffmannchristian growthofstaphylococcusaureusandescherichiacoliinlowdirectcurrentelectricfields AT hellmichmartin growthofstaphylococcusaureusandescherichiacoliinlowdirectcurrentelectricfields AT faberfranz growthofstaphylococcusaureusandescherichiacoliinlowdirectcurrentelectricfields AT niedermeierwilhelm growthofstaphylococcusaureusandescherichiacoliinlowdirectcurrentelectricfields |