Cargando…

The growth of Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli in low-direct current electric fields

Electrical potentials up to 800 mV can be observed between different metallic dental restorations. These potentials produce fields in the mouth that may interfere with microbial communities. The present study focuses on the impact of different electric field strengths (EFS) on the growth of Staphylo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zituni, Dunya, Schütt-Gerowitt, Heidi, Kopp, Marion, Krönke, Martin, Addicks, Klaus, Hoffmann, Christian, Hellmich, Martin, Faber, Franz, Niedermeier, Wilhelm
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3967302/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24008271
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ijos.2013.64
_version_ 1782309013446197248
author Zituni, Dunya
Schütt-Gerowitt, Heidi
Kopp, Marion
Krönke, Martin
Addicks, Klaus
Hoffmann, Christian
Hellmich, Martin
Faber, Franz
Niedermeier, Wilhelm
author_facet Zituni, Dunya
Schütt-Gerowitt, Heidi
Kopp, Marion
Krönke, Martin
Addicks, Klaus
Hoffmann, Christian
Hellmich, Martin
Faber, Franz
Niedermeier, Wilhelm
author_sort Zituni, Dunya
collection PubMed
description Electrical potentials up to 800 mV can be observed between different metallic dental restorations. These potentials produce fields in the mouth that may interfere with microbial communities. The present study focuses on the impact of different electric field strengths (EFS) on the growth of Staphylococcus aureus (ATCC 25923) and Escherichia coli (ATCC 25922) in vitro. Cultures of S. aureus and E. coli in fluid and gel medium were exposed to different EFS. Effects were determined by calculation of viable counts and measurement of inhibition zones. In gel medium, anodic inhibition zones for S. aureus were larger than those for E. coli at all field strength levels. In fluid medium, the maximum decrease in the viable count of S. aureus cells was at 10 V⋅m(−1). Field-treated S. aureus cells presented ruptured cell walls and disintegrated cytoplasm. Conclusively, S. aureus is more sensitive to increasing electric field strength than E. coli.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3967302
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39673022014-03-27 The growth of Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli in low-direct current electric fields Zituni, Dunya Schütt-Gerowitt, Heidi Kopp, Marion Krönke, Martin Addicks, Klaus Hoffmann, Christian Hellmich, Martin Faber, Franz Niedermeier, Wilhelm Int J Oral Sci Original Article Electrical potentials up to 800 mV can be observed between different metallic dental restorations. These potentials produce fields in the mouth that may interfere with microbial communities. The present study focuses on the impact of different electric field strengths (EFS) on the growth of Staphylococcus aureus (ATCC 25923) and Escherichia coli (ATCC 25922) in vitro. Cultures of S. aureus and E. coli in fluid and gel medium were exposed to different EFS. Effects were determined by calculation of viable counts and measurement of inhibition zones. In gel medium, anodic inhibition zones for S. aureus were larger than those for E. coli at all field strength levels. In fluid medium, the maximum decrease in the viable count of S. aureus cells was at 10 V⋅m(−1). Field-treated S. aureus cells presented ruptured cell walls and disintegrated cytoplasm. Conclusively, S. aureus is more sensitive to increasing electric field strength than E. coli. Nature Publishing Group 2014-03 2013-09-06 /pmc/articles/PMC3967302/ /pubmed/24008271 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ijos.2013.64 Text en Copyright © 2013 West China School of Stomatology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/
spellingShingle Original Article
Zituni, Dunya
Schütt-Gerowitt, Heidi
Kopp, Marion
Krönke, Martin
Addicks, Klaus
Hoffmann, Christian
Hellmich, Martin
Faber, Franz
Niedermeier, Wilhelm
The growth of Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli in low-direct current electric fields
title The growth of Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli in low-direct current electric fields
title_full The growth of Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli in low-direct current electric fields
title_fullStr The growth of Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli in low-direct current electric fields
title_full_unstemmed The growth of Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli in low-direct current electric fields
title_short The growth of Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli in low-direct current electric fields
title_sort growth of staphylococcus aureus and escherichia coli in low-direct current electric fields
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3967302/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24008271
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ijos.2013.64
work_keys_str_mv AT zitunidunya thegrowthofstaphylococcusaureusandescherichiacoliinlowdirectcurrentelectricfields
AT schuttgerowittheidi thegrowthofstaphylococcusaureusandescherichiacoliinlowdirectcurrentelectricfields
AT koppmarion thegrowthofstaphylococcusaureusandescherichiacoliinlowdirectcurrentelectricfields
AT kronkemartin thegrowthofstaphylococcusaureusandescherichiacoliinlowdirectcurrentelectricfields
AT addicksklaus thegrowthofstaphylococcusaureusandescherichiacoliinlowdirectcurrentelectricfields
AT hoffmannchristian thegrowthofstaphylococcusaureusandescherichiacoliinlowdirectcurrentelectricfields
AT hellmichmartin thegrowthofstaphylococcusaureusandescherichiacoliinlowdirectcurrentelectricfields
AT faberfranz thegrowthofstaphylococcusaureusandescherichiacoliinlowdirectcurrentelectricfields
AT niedermeierwilhelm thegrowthofstaphylococcusaureusandescherichiacoliinlowdirectcurrentelectricfields
AT zitunidunya growthofstaphylococcusaureusandescherichiacoliinlowdirectcurrentelectricfields
AT schuttgerowittheidi growthofstaphylococcusaureusandescherichiacoliinlowdirectcurrentelectricfields
AT koppmarion growthofstaphylococcusaureusandescherichiacoliinlowdirectcurrentelectricfields
AT kronkemartin growthofstaphylococcusaureusandescherichiacoliinlowdirectcurrentelectricfields
AT addicksklaus growthofstaphylococcusaureusandescherichiacoliinlowdirectcurrentelectricfields
AT hoffmannchristian growthofstaphylococcusaureusandescherichiacoliinlowdirectcurrentelectricfields
AT hellmichmartin growthofstaphylococcusaureusandescherichiacoliinlowdirectcurrentelectricfields
AT faberfranz growthofstaphylococcusaureusandescherichiacoliinlowdirectcurrentelectricfields
AT niedermeierwilhelm growthofstaphylococcusaureusandescherichiacoliinlowdirectcurrentelectricfields