Cargando…

Systematic review of mini-implant displacement under orthodontic loading

A growing number of studies have reported that mini-implants do not remain in exactly the same position during treatment, although they remain stable. The aim of this review was to collect data regarding primary displacement immediately straight after loading and secondary displacement over time. A...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nienkemper, Manuel, Handschel, Jörg, Drescher, Dieter
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3967307/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24357855
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ijos.2013.92
_version_ 1782309014582853632
author Nienkemper, Manuel
Handschel, Jörg
Drescher, Dieter
author_facet Nienkemper, Manuel
Handschel, Jörg
Drescher, Dieter
author_sort Nienkemper, Manuel
collection PubMed
description A growing number of studies have reported that mini-implants do not remain in exactly the same position during treatment, although they remain stable. The aim of this review was to collect data regarding primary displacement immediately straight after loading and secondary displacement over time. A systematic review was performed to investigate primary and secondary displacement. The amount and type of displacement were recorded. A total of 27 studies were included. Sixteen in vitro studies or studies using finite element analysis addressed primary displacement, and nine clinical studies and two animal studies addressed secondary displacement. Significant primary displacement was detected (6.4–24.4 µm) for relevant orthodontic forces (0.5–2.5 N). The mean secondary displacement ranged from 0 to 2.7 mm for entire mini-implants. The maximum values for each clinical study ranged from 1.0 to 4.1 mm for the head, 1.0 to 1.5 for the body and 1.0 to 1.92 mm for the tail part. The most frequent type of movement was controlled tipping or bodily movement. Primary displacement did not reach a clinically significant level. However, clinicians can expect relevant secondary displacement in the direction of force. Consequently, decentralized insertion within the inter-radicular space, away from force direction, might be favourable. More evidence is needed to provide quantitative recommendations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3967307
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39673072014-03-27 Systematic review of mini-implant displacement under orthodontic loading Nienkemper, Manuel Handschel, Jörg Drescher, Dieter Int J Oral Sci Review A growing number of studies have reported that mini-implants do not remain in exactly the same position during treatment, although they remain stable. The aim of this review was to collect data regarding primary displacement immediately straight after loading and secondary displacement over time. A systematic review was performed to investigate primary and secondary displacement. The amount and type of displacement were recorded. A total of 27 studies were included. Sixteen in vitro studies or studies using finite element analysis addressed primary displacement, and nine clinical studies and two animal studies addressed secondary displacement. Significant primary displacement was detected (6.4–24.4 µm) for relevant orthodontic forces (0.5–2.5 N). The mean secondary displacement ranged from 0 to 2.7 mm for entire mini-implants. The maximum values for each clinical study ranged from 1.0 to 4.1 mm for the head, 1.0 to 1.5 for the body and 1.0 to 1.92 mm for the tail part. The most frequent type of movement was controlled tipping or bodily movement. Primary displacement did not reach a clinically significant level. However, clinicians can expect relevant secondary displacement in the direction of force. Consequently, decentralized insertion within the inter-radicular space, away from force direction, might be favourable. More evidence is needed to provide quantitative recommendations. Nature Publishing Group 2014-03 2013-12-20 /pmc/articles/PMC3967307/ /pubmed/24357855 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ijos.2013.92 Text en Copyright © 2013 West China School of Stomatology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/
spellingShingle Review
Nienkemper, Manuel
Handschel, Jörg
Drescher, Dieter
Systematic review of mini-implant displacement under orthodontic loading
title Systematic review of mini-implant displacement under orthodontic loading
title_full Systematic review of mini-implant displacement under orthodontic loading
title_fullStr Systematic review of mini-implant displacement under orthodontic loading
title_full_unstemmed Systematic review of mini-implant displacement under orthodontic loading
title_short Systematic review of mini-implant displacement under orthodontic loading
title_sort systematic review of mini-implant displacement under orthodontic loading
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3967307/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24357855
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ijos.2013.92
work_keys_str_mv AT nienkempermanuel systematicreviewofminiimplantdisplacementunderorthodonticloading
AT handscheljorg systematicreviewofminiimplantdisplacementunderorthodonticloading
AT drescherdieter systematicreviewofminiimplantdisplacementunderorthodonticloading