Cargando…

Decreasing Quality of the New Generations of Anti-Müllerian Hormone Assays

Anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) measurements are widely used to optimize the stimulation protocols. First generation AMH kits correlated well with ovarian reserve and response to stimulation. In the present study we aimed to asses if the new generation kits share the same accurate correlations. Retrosp...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lukaszuk, Krzysztof, Ludwikowska, Beata, Liss, Joanna, Kunicki, Michal, Sawczak, Miroslaw, Lukaszuk, Aron, Plociennik, Lukasz, Jakiel, Grzegorz, Wasniewski, Tomasz, Woclawek-Potocka, Izabela, Bialobrzeska, Dorota
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3967630/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24738048
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/165352
_version_ 1782309043987021824
author Lukaszuk, Krzysztof
Ludwikowska, Beata
Liss, Joanna
Kunicki, Michal
Sawczak, Miroslaw
Lukaszuk, Aron
Plociennik, Lukasz
Jakiel, Grzegorz
Wasniewski, Tomasz
Woclawek-Potocka, Izabela
Bialobrzeska, Dorota
author_facet Lukaszuk, Krzysztof
Ludwikowska, Beata
Liss, Joanna
Kunicki, Michal
Sawczak, Miroslaw
Lukaszuk, Aron
Plociennik, Lukasz
Jakiel, Grzegorz
Wasniewski, Tomasz
Woclawek-Potocka, Izabela
Bialobrzeska, Dorota
author_sort Lukaszuk, Krzysztof
collection PubMed
description Anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) measurements are widely used to optimize the stimulation protocols. First generation AMH kits correlated well with ovarian reserve and response to stimulation. In the present study we aimed to asses if the new generation kits share the same accurate correlations. Retrospective data were collected from 8323 blood samples. For comparison we used Immunotech I generation kit (ImI 4035 samples), Beckman Coulter II generation kit RUO (BCII RUO 3449, samples) and Beckman Coulter II generation kit with IVD certificate (BCII IVD 839 samples). We compared average AMH concentrations measured with different kits, as well as correlation between kits. We also compared average AMH concentrations in sera collected on different cycle days and samples of different quality of preservation. AMH serum concentrations differed for each kit, ranging 4.4 ± 4.12 (mean ± SD) for the ImI, 2.68 ± 3.15 for the BCII RUO, and 1.64 ± 2.85 for BCII IVD. The mean differences from an adjusted regression model were −48.7%, −40%, and −69.2%, respectively. In conclusion, the changes of the BC AMH kits are unpredictable; however, the improvement of them is still possible. It would be very dangerous to use elaborated stimulation protocol (based on the Ist generation AMH results) with the results from the IInd generation assays.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3967630
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39676302014-04-15 Decreasing Quality of the New Generations of Anti-Müllerian Hormone Assays Lukaszuk, Krzysztof Ludwikowska, Beata Liss, Joanna Kunicki, Michal Sawczak, Miroslaw Lukaszuk, Aron Plociennik, Lukasz Jakiel, Grzegorz Wasniewski, Tomasz Woclawek-Potocka, Izabela Bialobrzeska, Dorota Biomed Res Int Research Article Anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) measurements are widely used to optimize the stimulation protocols. First generation AMH kits correlated well with ovarian reserve and response to stimulation. In the present study we aimed to asses if the new generation kits share the same accurate correlations. Retrospective data were collected from 8323 blood samples. For comparison we used Immunotech I generation kit (ImI 4035 samples), Beckman Coulter II generation kit RUO (BCII RUO 3449, samples) and Beckman Coulter II generation kit with IVD certificate (BCII IVD 839 samples). We compared average AMH concentrations measured with different kits, as well as correlation between kits. We also compared average AMH concentrations in sera collected on different cycle days and samples of different quality of preservation. AMH serum concentrations differed for each kit, ranging 4.4 ± 4.12 (mean ± SD) for the ImI, 2.68 ± 3.15 for the BCII RUO, and 1.64 ± 2.85 for BCII IVD. The mean differences from an adjusted regression model were −48.7%, −40%, and −69.2%, respectively. In conclusion, the changes of the BC AMH kits are unpredictable; however, the improvement of them is still possible. It would be very dangerous to use elaborated stimulation protocol (based on the Ist generation AMH results) with the results from the IInd generation assays. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2014 2014-03-11 /pmc/articles/PMC3967630/ /pubmed/24738048 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/165352 Text en Copyright © 2014 Krzysztof Lukaszuk et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Lukaszuk, Krzysztof
Ludwikowska, Beata
Liss, Joanna
Kunicki, Michal
Sawczak, Miroslaw
Lukaszuk, Aron
Plociennik, Lukasz
Jakiel, Grzegorz
Wasniewski, Tomasz
Woclawek-Potocka, Izabela
Bialobrzeska, Dorota
Decreasing Quality of the New Generations of Anti-Müllerian Hormone Assays
title Decreasing Quality of the New Generations of Anti-Müllerian Hormone Assays
title_full Decreasing Quality of the New Generations of Anti-Müllerian Hormone Assays
title_fullStr Decreasing Quality of the New Generations of Anti-Müllerian Hormone Assays
title_full_unstemmed Decreasing Quality of the New Generations of Anti-Müllerian Hormone Assays
title_short Decreasing Quality of the New Generations of Anti-Müllerian Hormone Assays
title_sort decreasing quality of the new generations of anti-müllerian hormone assays
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3967630/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24738048
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/165352
work_keys_str_mv AT lukaszukkrzysztof decreasingqualityofthenewgenerationsofantimullerianhormoneassays
AT ludwikowskabeata decreasingqualityofthenewgenerationsofantimullerianhormoneassays
AT lissjoanna decreasingqualityofthenewgenerationsofantimullerianhormoneassays
AT kunickimichal decreasingqualityofthenewgenerationsofantimullerianhormoneassays
AT sawczakmiroslaw decreasingqualityofthenewgenerationsofantimullerianhormoneassays
AT lukaszukaron decreasingqualityofthenewgenerationsofantimullerianhormoneassays
AT plocienniklukasz decreasingqualityofthenewgenerationsofantimullerianhormoneassays
AT jakielgrzegorz decreasingqualityofthenewgenerationsofantimullerianhormoneassays
AT wasniewskitomasz decreasingqualityofthenewgenerationsofantimullerianhormoneassays
AT woclawekpotockaizabela decreasingqualityofthenewgenerationsofantimullerianhormoneassays
AT bialobrzeskadorota decreasingqualityofthenewgenerationsofantimullerianhormoneassays