Cargando…

Determining population structure and hybridization for two iris species

Identifying processes that promote or limit gene flow can help define the ecological and evolutionary history of a species. Furthermore, defining those factors that make up “species boundaries” can provide a definition of the independent evolutionary trajectories of related taxa. For many species, t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hamlin, Jennafer A P, Arnold, Michael L
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons Ltd 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3967900/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24683457
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.964
_version_ 1782309073061937152
author Hamlin, Jennafer A P
Arnold, Michael L
author_facet Hamlin, Jennafer A P
Arnold, Michael L
author_sort Hamlin, Jennafer A P
collection PubMed
description Identifying processes that promote or limit gene flow can help define the ecological and evolutionary history of a species. Furthermore, defining those factors that make up “species boundaries” can provide a definition of the independent evolutionary trajectories of related taxa. For many species, the historic processes that account for their distribution of genetic variation remain unresolved. In this study, we examine the geographic distribution of genetic diversity for two species of Louisiana Irises, Iris brevicaulis and Iris fulva. Specifically, we asked how populations are structured and if population structure coincides with potential barriers to gene flow. We also asked whether there is evidence of hybridization between these two species outside Louisiana hybrid zones. We used a genotyping-by-sequencing approach and sampled a large number of single nucleotide polymorphisms across these species' genomes. Two different population assignment methods were used to resolve population structure in I. brevicaulis; however, there was considerably less population structure in I. fulva. We used a species tree approach to infer phylogenies both within and between populations and species. For I. brevicaulis, the geography of the collection locality was reflected in the phylogeny. The I. fulva phylogeny reflected much less structure than detected for I. brevicaulis. Lastly, combining both species into a phylogenetic analysis resolved two of six populations of I. brevicaulis that shared alleles with I. fulva. Taken together, our results suggest major differences in the level and pattern of connectivity among populations of these two Louisiana Iris species.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3967900
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher John Wiley & Sons Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39679002014-03-28 Determining population structure and hybridization for two iris species Hamlin, Jennafer A P Arnold, Michael L Ecol Evol Original Research Identifying processes that promote or limit gene flow can help define the ecological and evolutionary history of a species. Furthermore, defining those factors that make up “species boundaries” can provide a definition of the independent evolutionary trajectories of related taxa. For many species, the historic processes that account for their distribution of genetic variation remain unresolved. In this study, we examine the geographic distribution of genetic diversity for two species of Louisiana Irises, Iris brevicaulis and Iris fulva. Specifically, we asked how populations are structured and if population structure coincides with potential barriers to gene flow. We also asked whether there is evidence of hybridization between these two species outside Louisiana hybrid zones. We used a genotyping-by-sequencing approach and sampled a large number of single nucleotide polymorphisms across these species' genomes. Two different population assignment methods were used to resolve population structure in I. brevicaulis; however, there was considerably less population structure in I. fulva. We used a species tree approach to infer phylogenies both within and between populations and species. For I. brevicaulis, the geography of the collection locality was reflected in the phylogeny. The I. fulva phylogeny reflected much less structure than detected for I. brevicaulis. Lastly, combining both species into a phylogenetic analysis resolved two of six populations of I. brevicaulis that shared alleles with I. fulva. Taken together, our results suggest major differences in the level and pattern of connectivity among populations of these two Louisiana Iris species. John Wiley & Sons Ltd 2014-03 2014-02-17 /pmc/articles/PMC3967900/ /pubmed/24683457 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.964 Text en © 2014 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Hamlin, Jennafer A P
Arnold, Michael L
Determining population structure and hybridization for two iris species
title Determining population structure and hybridization for two iris species
title_full Determining population structure and hybridization for two iris species
title_fullStr Determining population structure and hybridization for two iris species
title_full_unstemmed Determining population structure and hybridization for two iris species
title_short Determining population structure and hybridization for two iris species
title_sort determining population structure and hybridization for two iris species
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3967900/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24683457
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.964
work_keys_str_mv AT hamlinjennaferap determiningpopulationstructureandhybridizationfortwoirisspecies
AT arnoldmichaell determiningpopulationstructureandhybridizationfortwoirisspecies