Cargando…
Does incentivising pill-taking ‘crowd out’ risk-information processing? Evidence from a web-based experiment()
The use of financial incentives for changing health-related behaviours raises concerns regarding their potential to undermine the processing of risks associated with incentivised behaviours. Uncertainty remains about the validity of such concerns. This web-based experiment assessed the impact of fin...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Pergamon
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3969102/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24534735 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.01.020 |
_version_ | 1782309232226336768 |
---|---|
author | Mantzari, Eleni Vogt, Florian Marteau, Theresa M. |
author_facet | Mantzari, Eleni Vogt, Florian Marteau, Theresa M. |
author_sort | Mantzari, Eleni |
collection | PubMed |
description | The use of financial incentives for changing health-related behaviours raises concerns regarding their potential to undermine the processing of risks associated with incentivised behaviours. Uncertainty remains about the validity of such concerns. This web-based experiment assessed the impact of financial incentives on i) willingness to take a pill with side-effects; ii) the time spent viewing risk-information and iii) risk-information processing, assessed by perceived-risk of taking the pill and knowledge of its side-effects. It further assesses whether effects are moderated by limiting cognitive capacity. Two-hundred and seventy-five UK-based university staff and students were recruited online under the pretext of being screened for a fictitious drug-trial. Participants were randomised to the offer of different compensation levels for taking a fictitious pill (£0; £25; £1000) and the presence or absence of a cognitive load task (presentation of five digits for later recall). Willingness to take the pill increased with the offer of £1000 (84% vs. 67%; OR 3.66, CI 95% 1.27–10.6), but not with the offer of £25 (79% vs. 67%; OR 1.68, CI 95% 0.71–4.01). Risk-information processing was unaffected by the offer of incentives. The time spent viewing the risk-information was affected by the offer of incentives, an effect moderated by cognitive load: Without load, time increased with the value of incentives (£1000: M = 304.4sec vs. £0: M = 37.8sec, p < 0.001; £25: M = 66.6sec vs. £0: M = 37.8sec, p < 0.001). Under load, time decreased with the offer of incentives (£1000: M = 48.9sec vs. £0: M = 132.7sec, p < 0.001; £25: M = 60.9sec vs. £0: M = 132.7sec, p < 0.001), but did not differ between the two incentivised groups (p = 1.00). This study finds no evidence to suggest incentives “crowd out” risk-information processing. On the contrary, incentives appear to signal risk, an effect, however, which disappears under cognitive load. Although these findings require replication, they highlight the need to maximise cognitive capacity when presenting information about incentivised health-related behaviours. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3969102 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Pergamon |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-39691022014-04-01 Does incentivising pill-taking ‘crowd out’ risk-information processing? Evidence from a web-based experiment() Mantzari, Eleni Vogt, Florian Marteau, Theresa M. Soc Sci Med Article The use of financial incentives for changing health-related behaviours raises concerns regarding their potential to undermine the processing of risks associated with incentivised behaviours. Uncertainty remains about the validity of such concerns. This web-based experiment assessed the impact of financial incentives on i) willingness to take a pill with side-effects; ii) the time spent viewing risk-information and iii) risk-information processing, assessed by perceived-risk of taking the pill and knowledge of its side-effects. It further assesses whether effects are moderated by limiting cognitive capacity. Two-hundred and seventy-five UK-based university staff and students were recruited online under the pretext of being screened for a fictitious drug-trial. Participants were randomised to the offer of different compensation levels for taking a fictitious pill (£0; £25; £1000) and the presence or absence of a cognitive load task (presentation of five digits for later recall). Willingness to take the pill increased with the offer of £1000 (84% vs. 67%; OR 3.66, CI 95% 1.27–10.6), but not with the offer of £25 (79% vs. 67%; OR 1.68, CI 95% 0.71–4.01). Risk-information processing was unaffected by the offer of incentives. The time spent viewing the risk-information was affected by the offer of incentives, an effect moderated by cognitive load: Without load, time increased with the value of incentives (£1000: M = 304.4sec vs. £0: M = 37.8sec, p < 0.001; £25: M = 66.6sec vs. £0: M = 37.8sec, p < 0.001). Under load, time decreased with the offer of incentives (£1000: M = 48.9sec vs. £0: M = 132.7sec, p < 0.001; £25: M = 60.9sec vs. £0: M = 132.7sec, p < 0.001), but did not differ between the two incentivised groups (p = 1.00). This study finds no evidence to suggest incentives “crowd out” risk-information processing. On the contrary, incentives appear to signal risk, an effect, however, which disappears under cognitive load. Although these findings require replication, they highlight the need to maximise cognitive capacity when presenting information about incentivised health-related behaviours. Pergamon 2014-04 /pmc/articles/PMC3969102/ /pubmed/24534735 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.01.020 Text en © 2014 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Article Mantzari, Eleni Vogt, Florian Marteau, Theresa M. Does incentivising pill-taking ‘crowd out’ risk-information processing? Evidence from a web-based experiment() |
title | Does incentivising pill-taking ‘crowd out’ risk-information processing? Evidence from a web-based experiment() |
title_full | Does incentivising pill-taking ‘crowd out’ risk-information processing? Evidence from a web-based experiment() |
title_fullStr | Does incentivising pill-taking ‘crowd out’ risk-information processing? Evidence from a web-based experiment() |
title_full_unstemmed | Does incentivising pill-taking ‘crowd out’ risk-information processing? Evidence from a web-based experiment() |
title_short | Does incentivising pill-taking ‘crowd out’ risk-information processing? Evidence from a web-based experiment() |
title_sort | does incentivising pill-taking ‘crowd out’ risk-information processing? evidence from a web-based experiment() |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3969102/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24534735 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.01.020 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mantzarieleni doesincentivisingpilltakingcrowdoutriskinformationprocessingevidencefromawebbasedexperiment AT vogtflorian doesincentivisingpilltakingcrowdoutriskinformationprocessingevidencefromawebbasedexperiment AT marteautheresam doesincentivisingpilltakingcrowdoutriskinformationprocessingevidencefromawebbasedexperiment |