Cargando…

Does incentivising pill-taking ‘crowd out’ risk-information processing? Evidence from a web-based experiment()

The use of financial incentives for changing health-related behaviours raises concerns regarding their potential to undermine the processing of risks associated with incentivised behaviours. Uncertainty remains about the validity of such concerns. This web-based experiment assessed the impact of fin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mantzari, Eleni, Vogt, Florian, Marteau, Theresa M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Pergamon 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3969102/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24534735
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.01.020
_version_ 1782309232226336768
author Mantzari, Eleni
Vogt, Florian
Marteau, Theresa M.
author_facet Mantzari, Eleni
Vogt, Florian
Marteau, Theresa M.
author_sort Mantzari, Eleni
collection PubMed
description The use of financial incentives for changing health-related behaviours raises concerns regarding their potential to undermine the processing of risks associated with incentivised behaviours. Uncertainty remains about the validity of such concerns. This web-based experiment assessed the impact of financial incentives on i) willingness to take a pill with side-effects; ii) the time spent viewing risk-information and iii) risk-information processing, assessed by perceived-risk of taking the pill and knowledge of its side-effects. It further assesses whether effects are moderated by limiting cognitive capacity. Two-hundred and seventy-five UK-based university staff and students were recruited online under the pretext of being screened for a fictitious drug-trial. Participants were randomised to the offer of different compensation levels for taking a fictitious pill (£0; £25; £1000) and the presence or absence of a cognitive load task (presentation of five digits for later recall). Willingness to take the pill increased with the offer of £1000 (84% vs. 67%; OR 3.66, CI 95% 1.27–10.6), but not with the offer of £25 (79% vs. 67%; OR 1.68, CI 95% 0.71–4.01). Risk-information processing was unaffected by the offer of incentives. The time spent viewing the risk-information was affected by the offer of incentives, an effect moderated by cognitive load: Without load, time increased with the value of incentives (£1000: M = 304.4sec vs. £0: M = 37.8sec, p < 0.001; £25: M = 66.6sec vs. £0: M = 37.8sec, p < 0.001). Under load, time decreased with the offer of incentives (£1000: M = 48.9sec vs. £0: M = 132.7sec, p < 0.001; £25: M = 60.9sec vs. £0: M = 132.7sec, p < 0.001), but did not differ between the two incentivised groups (p = 1.00). This study finds no evidence to suggest incentives “crowd out” risk-information processing. On the contrary, incentives appear to signal risk, an effect, however, which disappears under cognitive load. Although these findings require replication, they highlight the need to maximise cognitive capacity when presenting information about incentivised health-related behaviours.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3969102
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Pergamon
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39691022014-04-01 Does incentivising pill-taking ‘crowd out’ risk-information processing? Evidence from a web-based experiment() Mantzari, Eleni Vogt, Florian Marteau, Theresa M. Soc Sci Med Article The use of financial incentives for changing health-related behaviours raises concerns regarding their potential to undermine the processing of risks associated with incentivised behaviours. Uncertainty remains about the validity of such concerns. This web-based experiment assessed the impact of financial incentives on i) willingness to take a pill with side-effects; ii) the time spent viewing risk-information and iii) risk-information processing, assessed by perceived-risk of taking the pill and knowledge of its side-effects. It further assesses whether effects are moderated by limiting cognitive capacity. Two-hundred and seventy-five UK-based university staff and students were recruited online under the pretext of being screened for a fictitious drug-trial. Participants were randomised to the offer of different compensation levels for taking a fictitious pill (£0; £25; £1000) and the presence or absence of a cognitive load task (presentation of five digits for later recall). Willingness to take the pill increased with the offer of £1000 (84% vs. 67%; OR 3.66, CI 95% 1.27–10.6), but not with the offer of £25 (79% vs. 67%; OR 1.68, CI 95% 0.71–4.01). Risk-information processing was unaffected by the offer of incentives. The time spent viewing the risk-information was affected by the offer of incentives, an effect moderated by cognitive load: Without load, time increased with the value of incentives (£1000: M = 304.4sec vs. £0: M = 37.8sec, p < 0.001; £25: M = 66.6sec vs. £0: M = 37.8sec, p < 0.001). Under load, time decreased with the offer of incentives (£1000: M = 48.9sec vs. £0: M = 132.7sec, p < 0.001; £25: M = 60.9sec vs. £0: M = 132.7sec, p < 0.001), but did not differ between the two incentivised groups (p = 1.00). This study finds no evidence to suggest incentives “crowd out” risk-information processing. On the contrary, incentives appear to signal risk, an effect, however, which disappears under cognitive load. Although these findings require replication, they highlight the need to maximise cognitive capacity when presenting information about incentivised health-related behaviours. Pergamon 2014-04 /pmc/articles/PMC3969102/ /pubmed/24534735 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.01.020 Text en © 2014 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Article
Mantzari, Eleni
Vogt, Florian
Marteau, Theresa M.
Does incentivising pill-taking ‘crowd out’ risk-information processing? Evidence from a web-based experiment()
title Does incentivising pill-taking ‘crowd out’ risk-information processing? Evidence from a web-based experiment()
title_full Does incentivising pill-taking ‘crowd out’ risk-information processing? Evidence from a web-based experiment()
title_fullStr Does incentivising pill-taking ‘crowd out’ risk-information processing? Evidence from a web-based experiment()
title_full_unstemmed Does incentivising pill-taking ‘crowd out’ risk-information processing? Evidence from a web-based experiment()
title_short Does incentivising pill-taking ‘crowd out’ risk-information processing? Evidence from a web-based experiment()
title_sort does incentivising pill-taking ‘crowd out’ risk-information processing? evidence from a web-based experiment()
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3969102/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24534735
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.01.020
work_keys_str_mv AT mantzarieleni doesincentivisingpilltakingcrowdoutriskinformationprocessingevidencefromawebbasedexperiment
AT vogtflorian doesincentivisingpilltakingcrowdoutriskinformationprocessingevidencefromawebbasedexperiment
AT marteautheresam doesincentivisingpilltakingcrowdoutriskinformationprocessingevidencefromawebbasedexperiment