Cargando…

Validity of Myocardial Infarction Diagnoses in Administrative Databases: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND: Though administrative databases are increasingly being used for research related to myocardial infarction (MI), the validity of MI diagnoses in these databases has never been synthesized on a large scale. OBJECTIVE: To conduct the first systematic review of studies reporting on the valid...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: McCormick, Natalie, Lacaille, Diane, Bhole, Vidula, Avina-Zubieta, J. Antonio
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3969323/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24682186
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0092286
_version_ 1782309255388332032
author McCormick, Natalie
Lacaille, Diane
Bhole, Vidula
Avina-Zubieta, J. Antonio
author_facet McCormick, Natalie
Lacaille, Diane
Bhole, Vidula
Avina-Zubieta, J. Antonio
author_sort McCormick, Natalie
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Though administrative databases are increasingly being used for research related to myocardial infarction (MI), the validity of MI diagnoses in these databases has never been synthesized on a large scale. OBJECTIVE: To conduct the first systematic review of studies reporting on the validity of diagnostic codes for identifying MI in administrative data. METHODS: MEDLINE and EMBASE were searched (inception to November 2010) for studies: (a) Using administrative data to identify MI; or (b) Evaluating the validity of MI codes in administrative data; and (c) Reporting validation statistics (sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value, or Kappa scores) for MI, or data sufficient for their calculation. Additonal articles were located by handsearch (up to February 2011) of original papers. Data were extracted by two independent reviewers; article quality was assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies tool. RESULTS: Thirty studies published from 1984–2010 were included; most assessed codes from the International Classification of Diseases (ICD)-9(th) revision. Sensitivity and specificity of hospitalization data for identifying MI in most [≥50%] studies was ≥86%, and PPV in most studies was ≥93%. The PPV was higher in the more-recent studies, and lower when criteria that do not incorporate cardiac troponin levels (such as the MONICA) were employed as the gold standard. MI as a cause-of-death on death certificates also demonstrated lower accuracy, with maximum PPV of 60% (for definite MI). CONCLUSIONS: Hospitalization data has higher validity and hence can be used to identify MI, but the accuracy of MI as a cause-of-death on death certificates is suboptimal, and more studies are needed on the validity of ICD-10 codes. When using administrative data for research purposes, authors should recognize these factors and avoid using vital statistics data if hospitalization data is not available to confirm deaths from MI.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3969323
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39693232014-04-01 Validity of Myocardial Infarction Diagnoses in Administrative Databases: A Systematic Review McCormick, Natalie Lacaille, Diane Bhole, Vidula Avina-Zubieta, J. Antonio PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Though administrative databases are increasingly being used for research related to myocardial infarction (MI), the validity of MI diagnoses in these databases has never been synthesized on a large scale. OBJECTIVE: To conduct the first systematic review of studies reporting on the validity of diagnostic codes for identifying MI in administrative data. METHODS: MEDLINE and EMBASE were searched (inception to November 2010) for studies: (a) Using administrative data to identify MI; or (b) Evaluating the validity of MI codes in administrative data; and (c) Reporting validation statistics (sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value, or Kappa scores) for MI, or data sufficient for their calculation. Additonal articles were located by handsearch (up to February 2011) of original papers. Data were extracted by two independent reviewers; article quality was assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies tool. RESULTS: Thirty studies published from 1984–2010 were included; most assessed codes from the International Classification of Diseases (ICD)-9(th) revision. Sensitivity and specificity of hospitalization data for identifying MI in most [≥50%] studies was ≥86%, and PPV in most studies was ≥93%. The PPV was higher in the more-recent studies, and lower when criteria that do not incorporate cardiac troponin levels (such as the MONICA) were employed as the gold standard. MI as a cause-of-death on death certificates also demonstrated lower accuracy, with maximum PPV of 60% (for definite MI). CONCLUSIONS: Hospitalization data has higher validity and hence can be used to identify MI, but the accuracy of MI as a cause-of-death on death certificates is suboptimal, and more studies are needed on the validity of ICD-10 codes. When using administrative data for research purposes, authors should recognize these factors and avoid using vital statistics data if hospitalization data is not available to confirm deaths from MI. Public Library of Science 2014-03-28 /pmc/articles/PMC3969323/ /pubmed/24682186 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0092286 Text en © 2014 McCormick et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
McCormick, Natalie
Lacaille, Diane
Bhole, Vidula
Avina-Zubieta, J. Antonio
Validity of Myocardial Infarction Diagnoses in Administrative Databases: A Systematic Review
title Validity of Myocardial Infarction Diagnoses in Administrative Databases: A Systematic Review
title_full Validity of Myocardial Infarction Diagnoses in Administrative Databases: A Systematic Review
title_fullStr Validity of Myocardial Infarction Diagnoses in Administrative Databases: A Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed Validity of Myocardial Infarction Diagnoses in Administrative Databases: A Systematic Review
title_short Validity of Myocardial Infarction Diagnoses in Administrative Databases: A Systematic Review
title_sort validity of myocardial infarction diagnoses in administrative databases: a systematic review
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3969323/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24682186
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0092286
work_keys_str_mv AT mccormicknatalie validityofmyocardialinfarctiondiagnosesinadministrativedatabasesasystematicreview
AT lacaillediane validityofmyocardialinfarctiondiagnosesinadministrativedatabasesasystematicreview
AT bholevidula validityofmyocardialinfarctiondiagnosesinadministrativedatabasesasystematicreview
AT avinazubietajantonio validityofmyocardialinfarctiondiagnosesinadministrativedatabasesasystematicreview