Cargando…

Bioresorbable vascular scaffolds in acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: a prospective multicentre study ‘Prague 19’

AIMS: Bioresorbable vascular scaffolds (BVSs) have been studied in chronic coronary artery disease, but not in acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). This prospective multicentre study analysed the feasibility and safety of BVS implantation during primary percutaneous coronary int...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kočka, Viktor, Malý, Martin, Toušek, Petr, Buděšínský, Tomas, Lisa, Libor, Prodanov, Petko, Jarkovský, Jiri, Widimský, Petr
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3969527/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24419808
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/eht545
_version_ 1782309275074297856
author Kočka, Viktor
Malý, Martin
Toušek, Petr
Buděšínský, Tomas
Lisa, Libor
Prodanov, Petko
Jarkovský, Jiri
Widimský, Petr
author_facet Kočka, Viktor
Malý, Martin
Toušek, Petr
Buděšínský, Tomas
Lisa, Libor
Prodanov, Petko
Jarkovský, Jiri
Widimský, Petr
author_sort Kočka, Viktor
collection PubMed
description AIMS: Bioresorbable vascular scaffolds (BVSs) have been studied in chronic coronary artery disease, but not in acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). This prospective multicentre study analysed the feasibility and safety of BVS implantation during primary percutaneous coronary intervention (p-PCI) in STEMI. METHODS AND RESULTS: Bioresorbable vascular scaffold implantation became the default strategy for all consecutive STEMI patients between 15 December 2012 and 30 August 2013. A total of 142 patients underwent p-PCI; 41 of them (28.9%) fulfilled the inclusion/exclusion criteria for BVS implantation. The BVS device success was 98%, thrombolysis in myocardial infarction 3 flow was restored in 95% of patients, and acute scaffold recoil was 9.7%. An optical coherence tomography (OCT) substudy (21 patients) demonstrated excellent procedural results with only a 1.1% rate of scaffold strut malapposition. Edge dissections were present in a 38% of patients, but were small and clinically silent. Reference vessel diameter measured by quantitative coronary angiography was significantly lower than that measured by OCT by 0.29 (±0.56) mm, P = 0.028. Clinical outcomes were compared between BVS group and Control group; the latter was formed by patients who had implanted metallic stent and were in Killip Class I or II. Combined clinical endpoint was defined as death, myocardial infarction, or target vessel revascularization. Event-free survival was the same in both groups; 95% for BVS and 93% for Control group, P = 0.674. CONCLUSION: Bioresorbable vascular scaffold implantation in acute STEMI is feasible and safe. The procedural results evaluated by angiography and OCT are excellent. The early clinical results are encouraging.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3969527
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39695272014-03-31 Bioresorbable vascular scaffolds in acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: a prospective multicentre study ‘Prague 19’ Kočka, Viktor Malý, Martin Toušek, Petr Buděšínský, Tomas Lisa, Libor Prodanov, Petko Jarkovský, Jiri Widimský, Petr Eur Heart J Clinical Research AIMS: Bioresorbable vascular scaffolds (BVSs) have been studied in chronic coronary artery disease, but not in acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). This prospective multicentre study analysed the feasibility and safety of BVS implantation during primary percutaneous coronary intervention (p-PCI) in STEMI. METHODS AND RESULTS: Bioresorbable vascular scaffold implantation became the default strategy for all consecutive STEMI patients between 15 December 2012 and 30 August 2013. A total of 142 patients underwent p-PCI; 41 of them (28.9%) fulfilled the inclusion/exclusion criteria for BVS implantation. The BVS device success was 98%, thrombolysis in myocardial infarction 3 flow was restored in 95% of patients, and acute scaffold recoil was 9.7%. An optical coherence tomography (OCT) substudy (21 patients) demonstrated excellent procedural results with only a 1.1% rate of scaffold strut malapposition. Edge dissections were present in a 38% of patients, but were small and clinically silent. Reference vessel diameter measured by quantitative coronary angiography was significantly lower than that measured by OCT by 0.29 (±0.56) mm, P = 0.028. Clinical outcomes were compared between BVS group and Control group; the latter was formed by patients who had implanted metallic stent and were in Killip Class I or II. Combined clinical endpoint was defined as death, myocardial infarction, or target vessel revascularization. Event-free survival was the same in both groups; 95% for BVS and 93% for Control group, P = 0.674. CONCLUSION: Bioresorbable vascular scaffold implantation in acute STEMI is feasible and safe. The procedural results evaluated by angiography and OCT are excellent. The early clinical results are encouraging. Oxford University Press 2014-03-21 2014-01-12 /pmc/articles/PMC3969527/ /pubmed/24419808 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/eht545 Text en © The Author 2014. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Clinical Research
Kočka, Viktor
Malý, Martin
Toušek, Petr
Buděšínský, Tomas
Lisa, Libor
Prodanov, Petko
Jarkovský, Jiri
Widimský, Petr
Bioresorbable vascular scaffolds in acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: a prospective multicentre study ‘Prague 19’
title Bioresorbable vascular scaffolds in acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: a prospective multicentre study ‘Prague 19’
title_full Bioresorbable vascular scaffolds in acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: a prospective multicentre study ‘Prague 19’
title_fullStr Bioresorbable vascular scaffolds in acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: a prospective multicentre study ‘Prague 19’
title_full_unstemmed Bioresorbable vascular scaffolds in acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: a prospective multicentre study ‘Prague 19’
title_short Bioresorbable vascular scaffolds in acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: a prospective multicentre study ‘Prague 19’
title_sort bioresorbable vascular scaffolds in acute st-segment elevation myocardial infarction: a prospective multicentre study ‘prague 19’
topic Clinical Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3969527/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24419808
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/eht545
work_keys_str_mv AT kockaviktor bioresorbablevascularscaffoldsinacutestsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarctionaprospectivemulticentrestudyprague19
AT malymartin bioresorbablevascularscaffoldsinacutestsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarctionaprospectivemulticentrestudyprague19
AT tousekpetr bioresorbablevascularscaffoldsinacutestsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarctionaprospectivemulticentrestudyprague19
AT budesinskytomas bioresorbablevascularscaffoldsinacutestsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarctionaprospectivemulticentrestudyprague19
AT lisalibor bioresorbablevascularscaffoldsinacutestsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarctionaprospectivemulticentrestudyprague19
AT prodanovpetko bioresorbablevascularscaffoldsinacutestsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarctionaprospectivemulticentrestudyprague19
AT jarkovskyjiri bioresorbablevascularscaffoldsinacutestsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarctionaprospectivemulticentrestudyprague19
AT widimskypetr bioresorbablevascularscaffoldsinacutestsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarctionaprospectivemulticentrestudyprague19