Cargando…

Activity progression for anterior cruciate ligament injured individuals()

BACKGROUND: Functional exercises are important in the rehabilitation of anterior cruciate ligament deficient and reconstructed individuals but movement compensations and incomplete recovery persist. This study aimed to identify how tasks pose different challenges; and evaluate if different activitie...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Button, Kate, Roos, Paulien E., van Deursen, Robert W.M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier Science 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3969717/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24447417
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2013.11.010
_version_ 1782309305539624960
author Button, Kate
Roos, Paulien E.
van Deursen, Robert W.M.
author_facet Button, Kate
Roos, Paulien E.
van Deursen, Robert W.M.
author_sort Button, Kate
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Functional exercises are important in the rehabilitation of anterior cruciate ligament deficient and reconstructed individuals but movement compensations and incomplete recovery persist. This study aimed to identify how tasks pose different challenges; and evaluate if different activities challenge patient groups differently compared to controls. METHODS: Motion and force data were collected during distance hop, squatting and gait for 20 anterior cruciate ligament deficient, 21 reconstructed and 21 controls. FINDINGS: Knee range of motion was greatest during squatting, intermediate during hopping and smallest during gait (P < 0.01). Peak internal knee extensor moments were greatest during distance hop (P < 0.01). The mean value of peak knee moments was reduced in squatting and gait (P < 0.01) compared to hop. Peak internal extensor moments were significantly larger during squatting than gait and peak external adductor moments during gait compared to squatting (P < 0.01). Fluency was highest during squatting (P < 0.01). All patients demonstrated good recovery of gait but anterior cruciate ligament deficient adopted a strategy of increased fluency (P < 0.01). During squatting knee range of motion and peak internal knee extensor moment were reduced in all patients (P < 0.01). Both anterior cruciate ligament groups hopped a shorter distance (P < 0.01) and had reduced knee range of motion (P < 0.025). Anterior cruciate ligament reconstructed had reduced fluency (P < 0.01). INTERPRETATION: Distance hop was most challenging; squatting and gait were of similar difficulty but challenged patients in different ways. Despite squatting being an early, less challenging exercise, numerous compensation strategies were identified, indicating that this may be more challenging than gait.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3969717
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Elsevier Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39697172014-03-31 Activity progression for anterior cruciate ligament injured individuals() Button, Kate Roos, Paulien E. van Deursen, Robert W.M. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) Article BACKGROUND: Functional exercises are important in the rehabilitation of anterior cruciate ligament deficient and reconstructed individuals but movement compensations and incomplete recovery persist. This study aimed to identify how tasks pose different challenges; and evaluate if different activities challenge patient groups differently compared to controls. METHODS: Motion and force data were collected during distance hop, squatting and gait for 20 anterior cruciate ligament deficient, 21 reconstructed and 21 controls. FINDINGS: Knee range of motion was greatest during squatting, intermediate during hopping and smallest during gait (P < 0.01). Peak internal knee extensor moments were greatest during distance hop (P < 0.01). The mean value of peak knee moments was reduced in squatting and gait (P < 0.01) compared to hop. Peak internal extensor moments were significantly larger during squatting than gait and peak external adductor moments during gait compared to squatting (P < 0.01). Fluency was highest during squatting (P < 0.01). All patients demonstrated good recovery of gait but anterior cruciate ligament deficient adopted a strategy of increased fluency (P < 0.01). During squatting knee range of motion and peak internal knee extensor moment were reduced in all patients (P < 0.01). Both anterior cruciate ligament groups hopped a shorter distance (P < 0.01) and had reduced knee range of motion (P < 0.025). Anterior cruciate ligament reconstructed had reduced fluency (P < 0.01). INTERPRETATION: Distance hop was most challenging; squatting and gait were of similar difficulty but challenged patients in different ways. Despite squatting being an early, less challenging exercise, numerous compensation strategies were identified, indicating that this may be more challenging than gait. Elsevier Science 2014-02 /pmc/articles/PMC3969717/ /pubmed/24447417 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2013.11.010 Text en © 2013 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike License, which permits non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Article
Button, Kate
Roos, Paulien E.
van Deursen, Robert W.M.
Activity progression for anterior cruciate ligament injured individuals()
title Activity progression for anterior cruciate ligament injured individuals()
title_full Activity progression for anterior cruciate ligament injured individuals()
title_fullStr Activity progression for anterior cruciate ligament injured individuals()
title_full_unstemmed Activity progression for anterior cruciate ligament injured individuals()
title_short Activity progression for anterior cruciate ligament injured individuals()
title_sort activity progression for anterior cruciate ligament injured individuals()
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3969717/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24447417
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2013.11.010
work_keys_str_mv AT buttonkate activityprogressionforanteriorcruciateligamentinjuredindividuals
AT roospauliene activityprogressionforanteriorcruciateligamentinjuredindividuals
AT vandeursenrobertwm activityprogressionforanteriorcruciateligamentinjuredindividuals