Cargando…
The common and distinct neural bases of affect labeling and reappraisal in healthy adults
Emotion regulation is commonly characterized as involving conscious and intentional attempts to change felt emotions, such as, for example, through reappraisal whereby one intentionally decreases the intensity of one's emotional response to a particular stimulus or situation by reinterpreting i...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3970015/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24715880 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00221 |
_version_ | 1782309319802355712 |
---|---|
author | Burklund, Lisa J. Creswell, J. David Irwin, Michael R. Lieberman, Matthew D. |
author_facet | Burklund, Lisa J. Creswell, J. David Irwin, Michael R. Lieberman, Matthew D. |
author_sort | Burklund, Lisa J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Emotion regulation is commonly characterized as involving conscious and intentional attempts to change felt emotions, such as, for example, through reappraisal whereby one intentionally decreases the intensity of one's emotional response to a particular stimulus or situation by reinterpreting it in a less threatening way. However, there is growing evidence and appreciation that some types of emotion regulation are unintentional or incidental, meaning that affective modulation is a consequence but not an explicit goal. For example, affect labeling involves simply verbally labeling the emotional content of an external stimulus or one's own affective responses without an intentional goal of altering emotional responses, yet has been associated with reduced affective responses at the neural and experiential levels. Although both intentional and incidental emotional regulation strategies have been associated with diminished limbic responses and self-reported distress, little previous research has directly compared their underlying neural mechanisms. In this study, we examined the extent to which incidental and intentional emotion regulation, namely, affect labeling and reappraisal, produced common and divergent neural and self-report responses to aversive images relative to an observe-only control condition in a sample of healthy older adults (N = 39). Affect labeling and reappraisal produced common activations in several prefrontal regulatory regions, with affect labeling producing stronger responses in direct comparisons. Affect labeling and reappraisal were also associated with similar decreases in amygdala activity. Finally, affect labeling and reappraisal were associated with correlated reductions in self-reported distress. Together these results point to common neurocognitive mechanisms involved in affect labeling and reappraisal, supporting the idea that intentional and incidental emotion regulation may utilize overlapping neural processes. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3970015 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-39700152014-04-08 The common and distinct neural bases of affect labeling and reappraisal in healthy adults Burklund, Lisa J. Creswell, J. David Irwin, Michael R. Lieberman, Matthew D. Front Psychol Psychology Emotion regulation is commonly characterized as involving conscious and intentional attempts to change felt emotions, such as, for example, through reappraisal whereby one intentionally decreases the intensity of one's emotional response to a particular stimulus or situation by reinterpreting it in a less threatening way. However, there is growing evidence and appreciation that some types of emotion regulation are unintentional or incidental, meaning that affective modulation is a consequence but not an explicit goal. For example, affect labeling involves simply verbally labeling the emotional content of an external stimulus or one's own affective responses without an intentional goal of altering emotional responses, yet has been associated with reduced affective responses at the neural and experiential levels. Although both intentional and incidental emotional regulation strategies have been associated with diminished limbic responses and self-reported distress, little previous research has directly compared their underlying neural mechanisms. In this study, we examined the extent to which incidental and intentional emotion regulation, namely, affect labeling and reappraisal, produced common and divergent neural and self-report responses to aversive images relative to an observe-only control condition in a sample of healthy older adults (N = 39). Affect labeling and reappraisal produced common activations in several prefrontal regulatory regions, with affect labeling producing stronger responses in direct comparisons. Affect labeling and reappraisal were also associated with similar decreases in amygdala activity. Finally, affect labeling and reappraisal were associated with correlated reductions in self-reported distress. Together these results point to common neurocognitive mechanisms involved in affect labeling and reappraisal, supporting the idea that intentional and incidental emotion regulation may utilize overlapping neural processes. Frontiers Media S.A. 2014-03-24 /pmc/articles/PMC3970015/ /pubmed/24715880 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00221 Text en Copyright © 2014 Burklund, Creswell, Irwin and Lieberman. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Psychology Burklund, Lisa J. Creswell, J. David Irwin, Michael R. Lieberman, Matthew D. The common and distinct neural bases of affect labeling and reappraisal in healthy adults |
title | The common and distinct neural bases of affect labeling and reappraisal in healthy adults |
title_full | The common and distinct neural bases of affect labeling and reappraisal in healthy adults |
title_fullStr | The common and distinct neural bases of affect labeling and reappraisal in healthy adults |
title_full_unstemmed | The common and distinct neural bases of affect labeling and reappraisal in healthy adults |
title_short | The common and distinct neural bases of affect labeling and reappraisal in healthy adults |
title_sort | common and distinct neural bases of affect labeling and reappraisal in healthy adults |
topic | Psychology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3970015/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24715880 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00221 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT burklundlisaj thecommonanddistinctneuralbasesofaffectlabelingandreappraisalinhealthyadults AT creswelljdavid thecommonanddistinctneuralbasesofaffectlabelingandreappraisalinhealthyadults AT irwinmichaelr thecommonanddistinctneuralbasesofaffectlabelingandreappraisalinhealthyadults AT liebermanmatthewd thecommonanddistinctneuralbasesofaffectlabelingandreappraisalinhealthyadults AT burklundlisaj commonanddistinctneuralbasesofaffectlabelingandreappraisalinhealthyadults AT creswelljdavid commonanddistinctneuralbasesofaffectlabelingandreappraisalinhealthyadults AT irwinmichaelr commonanddistinctneuralbasesofaffectlabelingandreappraisalinhealthyadults AT liebermanmatthewd commonanddistinctneuralbasesofaffectlabelingandreappraisalinhealthyadults |