Cargando…

Cochlea size variability and implications in clinical practice

The objectives of this study were: 1) study cochlea size variability among age and degree of deafness; 2) calculate the length of the cochlear implant electrode needed to obtain the optimal final insertion depth angle of 270°. A total of 241 patients (482 ears) that underwent high resolution compute...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: PELLICCIA, P., VENAIL, F., BONAFÉ, A., MAKEIEFF, M., IANNETTI, G., BARTOLOMEO, M., MONDAIN, M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Pacini Editore SpA 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3970226/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24711682
_version_ 1782309352901705728
author PELLICCIA, P.
VENAIL, F.
BONAFÉ, A.
MAKEIEFF, M.
IANNETTI, G.
BARTOLOMEO, M.
MONDAIN, M.
author_facet PELLICCIA, P.
VENAIL, F.
BONAFÉ, A.
MAKEIEFF, M.
IANNETTI, G.
BARTOLOMEO, M.
MONDAIN, M.
author_sort PELLICCIA, P.
collection PubMed
description The objectives of this study were: 1) study cochlea size variability among age and degree of deafness; 2) calculate the length of the cochlear implant electrode needed to obtain the optimal final insertion depth angle of 270°. A total of 241 patients (482 ears) that underwent high resolution computed tomography (HRCT) of the ear in our Institution between 2003 and 2008 were included to collect temporal bone data, and were divided in 3 groups: 97 (194 ears) patients with bilateral severe or profound sensorineural hearing loss (Group A), 70 patients (140 ears) with bilateral moderate sensorineural hearing loss (Group B), 74 patients (148 ears) without sensorineural or mixed hearing loss (Group C). In each of the 3 groups, 5 subgroups were identified with the following age criteria: 1) subgroup 1: subjects ≤5 years old; 2) subgroup 2: subjects 6-10 years old; 3) subgroup 3: patients 11-15 years old; 4) subgroup 4: patients 16-20 years old; 5) subgroup 5: subjects >; 20 years old. The length of the cochlea, height of the cochlea, basal turn lumen diameter (BTLD) and volume of the cochlea were measured. The Mann-Whitney test was used to assess the alternative hypothesis that a statistically significant difference in size exists between the different groups and subgroups. The following equation was adopted to calculate the length of a straight electrode which follows the outer wall of the scala tympani required to obtain the ideal insertion depth angle of 270°( L(IC) ): [Formula: see text] . We found that the cochlea is completely developed and has reached adult size at birth. The degree of deafness does not affect the length or volume of the cochlea, while it can affect the height and BTLD. To assist the surgeon to calculate the ideal insertion depth angle of 270° in order to preserve residual hearing, it is useful to propose a straight electrode with 3 landmarks on the array (the first at 16.635 mm from the tip, the second at 17.987 mm and the third at 19.34 mm).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3970226
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Pacini Editore SpA
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39702262014-04-07 Cochlea size variability and implications in clinical practice PELLICCIA, P. VENAIL, F. BONAFÉ, A. MAKEIEFF, M. IANNETTI, G. BARTOLOMEO, M. MONDAIN, M. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital Audiology The objectives of this study were: 1) study cochlea size variability among age and degree of deafness; 2) calculate the length of the cochlear implant electrode needed to obtain the optimal final insertion depth angle of 270°. A total of 241 patients (482 ears) that underwent high resolution computed tomography (HRCT) of the ear in our Institution between 2003 and 2008 were included to collect temporal bone data, and were divided in 3 groups: 97 (194 ears) patients with bilateral severe or profound sensorineural hearing loss (Group A), 70 patients (140 ears) with bilateral moderate sensorineural hearing loss (Group B), 74 patients (148 ears) without sensorineural or mixed hearing loss (Group C). In each of the 3 groups, 5 subgroups were identified with the following age criteria: 1) subgroup 1: subjects ≤5 years old; 2) subgroup 2: subjects 6-10 years old; 3) subgroup 3: patients 11-15 years old; 4) subgroup 4: patients 16-20 years old; 5) subgroup 5: subjects >; 20 years old. The length of the cochlea, height of the cochlea, basal turn lumen diameter (BTLD) and volume of the cochlea were measured. The Mann-Whitney test was used to assess the alternative hypothesis that a statistically significant difference in size exists between the different groups and subgroups. The following equation was adopted to calculate the length of a straight electrode which follows the outer wall of the scala tympani required to obtain the ideal insertion depth angle of 270°( L(IC) ): [Formula: see text] . We found that the cochlea is completely developed and has reached adult size at birth. The degree of deafness does not affect the length or volume of the cochlea, while it can affect the height and BTLD. To assist the surgeon to calculate the ideal insertion depth angle of 270° in order to preserve residual hearing, it is useful to propose a straight electrode with 3 landmarks on the array (the first at 16.635 mm from the tip, the second at 17.987 mm and the third at 19.34 mm). Pacini Editore SpA 2014-02 /pmc/articles/PMC3970226/ /pubmed/24711682 Text en © Copyright by Società Italiana di Otorinolaringologia e Chirurgia Cervico-Facciale http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives License, which permits for noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any digital medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not altered in any way. For details, please refer to http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/
spellingShingle Audiology
PELLICCIA, P.
VENAIL, F.
BONAFÉ, A.
MAKEIEFF, M.
IANNETTI, G.
BARTOLOMEO, M.
MONDAIN, M.
Cochlea size variability and implications in clinical practice
title Cochlea size variability and implications in clinical practice
title_full Cochlea size variability and implications in clinical practice
title_fullStr Cochlea size variability and implications in clinical practice
title_full_unstemmed Cochlea size variability and implications in clinical practice
title_short Cochlea size variability and implications in clinical practice
title_sort cochlea size variability and implications in clinical practice
topic Audiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3970226/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24711682
work_keys_str_mv AT pellicciap cochleasizevariabilityandimplicationsinclinicalpractice
AT venailf cochleasizevariabilityandimplicationsinclinicalpractice
AT bonafea cochleasizevariabilityandimplicationsinclinicalpractice
AT makeieffm cochleasizevariabilityandimplicationsinclinicalpractice
AT iannettig cochleasizevariabilityandimplicationsinclinicalpractice
AT bartolomeom cochleasizevariabilityandimplicationsinclinicalpractice
AT mondainm cochleasizevariabilityandimplicationsinclinicalpractice