Cargando…

Regional difference in cancer detection rate in prostate cancer screening by a local municipality in Japan

PURPOSE: We conducted the present retrospective study to elucidate regional differences in the quality of secondary screening in the prostate cancer (PCA) screening program by a local municipality in Japan. METHODS: Of 115,881 men who attended the PCA screening in 36 municipalities between 2001 and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Koizumi, Chie, Suetomi, Takahiro, Matsuoka, Taeko, Ikeda, Atsushi, Kimura, Tomokazu, Onozawa, Mizuki, Miyazaki, Jun, Kawai, Koji, Takahashi, Hideto, Akaza, Hideyuki, Nishiyama, Hiroyuki
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Asian Pacific Prostate Society (APPS) 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3970985/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24693530
http://dx.doi.org/10.12954/PI.13035
_version_ 1782309444708728832
author Koizumi, Chie
Suetomi, Takahiro
Matsuoka, Taeko
Ikeda, Atsushi
Kimura, Tomokazu
Onozawa, Mizuki
Miyazaki, Jun
Kawai, Koji
Takahashi, Hideto
Akaza, Hideyuki
Nishiyama, Hiroyuki
author_facet Koizumi, Chie
Suetomi, Takahiro
Matsuoka, Taeko
Ikeda, Atsushi
Kimura, Tomokazu
Onozawa, Mizuki
Miyazaki, Jun
Kawai, Koji
Takahashi, Hideto
Akaza, Hideyuki
Nishiyama, Hiroyuki
author_sort Koizumi, Chie
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: We conducted the present retrospective study to elucidate regional differences in the quality of secondary screening in the prostate cancer (PCA) screening program by a local municipality in Japan. METHODS: Of 115,881 men who attended the PCA screening in 36 municipalities between 2001 and 2011, a total of 6,099 men consulted hospitals for secondary screening. The cancer detection rate (CDR) at the secondary screening was calculated, and municipalities were classified into three CDR groups according to the age-adjusted observed-to-expected ratios of CDR. Of the secondary screening facilities, hospitals in Ibaraki Prefecture screening less than 100 patients were classified as group I facilities and the others as group II facilities. RESULTS: Overall, 2,320 of 6,099 secondary screening patients underwent prostate biopsy, and 1,073 men were diagnosed with PCA. The overall CDR at the secondary screening was 17.6%, but it varied from 5.6% to 34.4% among municipalities. Although there were no significant differences in age and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) distribution among the three CDR groups, a significantly higher rate of patients in low CDR municipalities visited group I facilities. Both biopsy rates and CDRs of secondary screening at group II facilities were significantly higher than those of group I facilities (P=0.0001). Multivariate analysis showed that the secondary screening at group II facilities as well as age and PSA levels were independent contributing factors for PCA detection. CONCLUSIONS: CDRs at secondary screening varied widely among municipalities in Ibaraki Prefecture. Variation in CDRs was associated with biopsy rates.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3970985
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Asian Pacific Prostate Society (APPS)
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39709852014-04-01 Regional difference in cancer detection rate in prostate cancer screening by a local municipality in Japan Koizumi, Chie Suetomi, Takahiro Matsuoka, Taeko Ikeda, Atsushi Kimura, Tomokazu Onozawa, Mizuki Miyazaki, Jun Kawai, Koji Takahashi, Hideto Akaza, Hideyuki Nishiyama, Hiroyuki Prostate Int Original Articles PURPOSE: We conducted the present retrospective study to elucidate regional differences in the quality of secondary screening in the prostate cancer (PCA) screening program by a local municipality in Japan. METHODS: Of 115,881 men who attended the PCA screening in 36 municipalities between 2001 and 2011, a total of 6,099 men consulted hospitals for secondary screening. The cancer detection rate (CDR) at the secondary screening was calculated, and municipalities were classified into three CDR groups according to the age-adjusted observed-to-expected ratios of CDR. Of the secondary screening facilities, hospitals in Ibaraki Prefecture screening less than 100 patients were classified as group I facilities and the others as group II facilities. RESULTS: Overall, 2,320 of 6,099 secondary screening patients underwent prostate biopsy, and 1,073 men were diagnosed with PCA. The overall CDR at the secondary screening was 17.6%, but it varied from 5.6% to 34.4% among municipalities. Although there were no significant differences in age and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) distribution among the three CDR groups, a significantly higher rate of patients in low CDR municipalities visited group I facilities. Both biopsy rates and CDRs of secondary screening at group II facilities were significantly higher than those of group I facilities (P=0.0001). Multivariate analysis showed that the secondary screening at group II facilities as well as age and PSA levels were independent contributing factors for PCA detection. CONCLUSIONS: CDRs at secondary screening varied widely among municipalities in Ibaraki Prefecture. Variation in CDRs was associated with biopsy rates. Asian Pacific Prostate Society (APPS) 2014-03 2014-03-30 /pmc/articles/PMC3970985/ /pubmed/24693530 http://dx.doi.org/10.12954/PI.13035 Text en Copyright © 2014 Asian Pacific Prostate Society (APPS) This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Koizumi, Chie
Suetomi, Takahiro
Matsuoka, Taeko
Ikeda, Atsushi
Kimura, Tomokazu
Onozawa, Mizuki
Miyazaki, Jun
Kawai, Koji
Takahashi, Hideto
Akaza, Hideyuki
Nishiyama, Hiroyuki
Regional difference in cancer detection rate in prostate cancer screening by a local municipality in Japan
title Regional difference in cancer detection rate in prostate cancer screening by a local municipality in Japan
title_full Regional difference in cancer detection rate in prostate cancer screening by a local municipality in Japan
title_fullStr Regional difference in cancer detection rate in prostate cancer screening by a local municipality in Japan
title_full_unstemmed Regional difference in cancer detection rate in prostate cancer screening by a local municipality in Japan
title_short Regional difference in cancer detection rate in prostate cancer screening by a local municipality in Japan
title_sort regional difference in cancer detection rate in prostate cancer screening by a local municipality in japan
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3970985/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24693530
http://dx.doi.org/10.12954/PI.13035
work_keys_str_mv AT koizumichie regionaldifferenceincancerdetectionrateinprostatecancerscreeningbyalocalmunicipalityinjapan
AT suetomitakahiro regionaldifferenceincancerdetectionrateinprostatecancerscreeningbyalocalmunicipalityinjapan
AT matsuokataeko regionaldifferenceincancerdetectionrateinprostatecancerscreeningbyalocalmunicipalityinjapan
AT ikedaatsushi regionaldifferenceincancerdetectionrateinprostatecancerscreeningbyalocalmunicipalityinjapan
AT kimuratomokazu regionaldifferenceincancerdetectionrateinprostatecancerscreeningbyalocalmunicipalityinjapan
AT onozawamizuki regionaldifferenceincancerdetectionrateinprostatecancerscreeningbyalocalmunicipalityinjapan
AT miyazakijun regionaldifferenceincancerdetectionrateinprostatecancerscreeningbyalocalmunicipalityinjapan
AT kawaikoji regionaldifferenceincancerdetectionrateinprostatecancerscreeningbyalocalmunicipalityinjapan
AT takahashihideto regionaldifferenceincancerdetectionrateinprostatecancerscreeningbyalocalmunicipalityinjapan
AT akazahideyuki regionaldifferenceincancerdetectionrateinprostatecancerscreeningbyalocalmunicipalityinjapan
AT nishiyamahiroyuki regionaldifferenceincancerdetectionrateinprostatecancerscreeningbyalocalmunicipalityinjapan