Cargando…

Accuracy and precision of polyurethane dental arch models fabricated using a three-dimensional subtractive rapid prototyping method with an intraoral scanning technique

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy and precision of polyurethane (PUT) dental arch models fabricated using a three-dimensional (3D) subtractive rapid prototyping (RP) method with an intraoral scanning technique by comparing linear measurements obtained from PUT models and conventio...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kim, Jae-Hong, Kim, Ki-Baek, Kim, Woong-Chul, Kim, Ji-Hwan, Kim, Hae-Young
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Korean Association of Orthodontists 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3971128/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24696823
http://dx.doi.org/10.4041/kjod.2014.44.2.69
_version_ 1782309447856553984
author Kim, Jae-Hong
Kim, Ki-Baek
Kim, Woong-Chul
Kim, Ji-Hwan
Kim, Hae-Young
author_facet Kim, Jae-Hong
Kim, Ki-Baek
Kim, Woong-Chul
Kim, Ji-Hwan
Kim, Hae-Young
author_sort Kim, Jae-Hong
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy and precision of polyurethane (PUT) dental arch models fabricated using a three-dimensional (3D) subtractive rapid prototyping (RP) method with an intraoral scanning technique by comparing linear measurements obtained from PUT models and conventional plaster models. METHODS: Ten plaster models were duplicated using a selected standard master model and conventional impression, and 10 PUT models were duplicated using the 3D subtractive RP technique with an oral scanner. Six linear measurements were evaluated in terms of x, y, and z-axes using a non-contact white light scanner. Accuracy was assessed using mean differences between two measurements, and precision was examined using four quantitative methods and the Bland-Altman graphical method. Repeatability was evaluated in terms of intra-examiner variability, and reproducibility was assessed in terms of inter-examiner and inter-method variability. RESULTS: The mean difference between plaster models and PUT models ranged from 0.07 mm to 0.33 mm. Relative measurement errors ranged from 2.2% to 7.6% and intraclass correlation coefficients ranged from 0.93 to 0.96, when comparing plaster models and PUT models. The Bland-Altman plot showed good agreement. CONCLUSIONS: The accuracy and precision of PUT dental models for evaluating the performance of oral scanner and subtractive RP technology was acceptable. Because of the recent improvements in block material and computerized numeric control milling machines, the subtractive RP method may be a good choice for dental arch models.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3971128
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Korean Association of Orthodontists
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39711282014-04-02 Accuracy and precision of polyurethane dental arch models fabricated using a three-dimensional subtractive rapid prototyping method with an intraoral scanning technique Kim, Jae-Hong Kim, Ki-Baek Kim, Woong-Chul Kim, Ji-Hwan Kim, Hae-Young Korean J Orthod Original Article OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy and precision of polyurethane (PUT) dental arch models fabricated using a three-dimensional (3D) subtractive rapid prototyping (RP) method with an intraoral scanning technique by comparing linear measurements obtained from PUT models and conventional plaster models. METHODS: Ten plaster models were duplicated using a selected standard master model and conventional impression, and 10 PUT models were duplicated using the 3D subtractive RP technique with an oral scanner. Six linear measurements were evaluated in terms of x, y, and z-axes using a non-contact white light scanner. Accuracy was assessed using mean differences between two measurements, and precision was examined using four quantitative methods and the Bland-Altman graphical method. Repeatability was evaluated in terms of intra-examiner variability, and reproducibility was assessed in terms of inter-examiner and inter-method variability. RESULTS: The mean difference between plaster models and PUT models ranged from 0.07 mm to 0.33 mm. Relative measurement errors ranged from 2.2% to 7.6% and intraclass correlation coefficients ranged from 0.93 to 0.96, when comparing plaster models and PUT models. The Bland-Altman plot showed good agreement. CONCLUSIONS: The accuracy and precision of PUT dental models for evaluating the performance of oral scanner and subtractive RP technology was acceptable. Because of the recent improvements in block material and computerized numeric control milling machines, the subtractive RP method may be a good choice for dental arch models. Korean Association of Orthodontists 2014-03 2014-03-19 /pmc/articles/PMC3971128/ /pubmed/24696823 http://dx.doi.org/10.4041/kjod.2014.44.2.69 Text en © 2014 The Korean Association of Orthodontists. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Kim, Jae-Hong
Kim, Ki-Baek
Kim, Woong-Chul
Kim, Ji-Hwan
Kim, Hae-Young
Accuracy and precision of polyurethane dental arch models fabricated using a three-dimensional subtractive rapid prototyping method with an intraoral scanning technique
title Accuracy and precision of polyurethane dental arch models fabricated using a three-dimensional subtractive rapid prototyping method with an intraoral scanning technique
title_full Accuracy and precision of polyurethane dental arch models fabricated using a three-dimensional subtractive rapid prototyping method with an intraoral scanning technique
title_fullStr Accuracy and precision of polyurethane dental arch models fabricated using a three-dimensional subtractive rapid prototyping method with an intraoral scanning technique
title_full_unstemmed Accuracy and precision of polyurethane dental arch models fabricated using a three-dimensional subtractive rapid prototyping method with an intraoral scanning technique
title_short Accuracy and precision of polyurethane dental arch models fabricated using a three-dimensional subtractive rapid prototyping method with an intraoral scanning technique
title_sort accuracy and precision of polyurethane dental arch models fabricated using a three-dimensional subtractive rapid prototyping method with an intraoral scanning technique
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3971128/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24696823
http://dx.doi.org/10.4041/kjod.2014.44.2.69
work_keys_str_mv AT kimjaehong accuracyandprecisionofpolyurethanedentalarchmodelsfabricatedusingathreedimensionalsubtractiverapidprototypingmethodwithanintraoralscanningtechnique
AT kimkibaek accuracyandprecisionofpolyurethanedentalarchmodelsfabricatedusingathreedimensionalsubtractiverapidprototypingmethodwithanintraoralscanningtechnique
AT kimwoongchul accuracyandprecisionofpolyurethanedentalarchmodelsfabricatedusingathreedimensionalsubtractiverapidprototypingmethodwithanintraoralscanningtechnique
AT kimjihwan accuracyandprecisionofpolyurethanedentalarchmodelsfabricatedusingathreedimensionalsubtractiverapidprototypingmethodwithanintraoralscanningtechnique
AT kimhaeyoung accuracyandprecisionofpolyurethanedentalarchmodelsfabricatedusingathreedimensionalsubtractiverapidprototypingmethodwithanintraoralscanningtechnique