Cargando…

Non-Invasive Cardiac Output Measurement in Low and Very Low Birth Weight Infants: A Method Comparison

Background: Cardiac output (CO) measurement in low (LBW) and very low (VLBW) birth weight infants is difficult. Hitherto, sporadical transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) is the only non-invasive measurement method. Electrical velocimetry (EV) has been evaluated as an alternative in normal weight new...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Grollmuss, Oswin, Gonzalez, Patricia
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3971202/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24724074
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fped.2014.00016
_version_ 1782309459700219904
author Grollmuss, Oswin
Gonzalez, Patricia
author_facet Grollmuss, Oswin
Gonzalez, Patricia
author_sort Grollmuss, Oswin
collection PubMed
description Background: Cardiac output (CO) measurement in low (LBW) and very low (VLBW) birth weight infants is difficult. Hitherto, sporadical transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) is the only non-invasive measurement method. Electrical velocimetry (EV) has been evaluated as an alternative in normal weight newborns. Objectives: The study was designed to evaluate if EV could be interchangeable with TTE even in LBW and VLBW infants. Methods: In 28 (17 LBW, 11 VLBW) pre-mature newborns, n = 228 simultaneous TTE (trans-aortic Doppler), and EV measurements (134 LBW, 94 VLBW) of stroke volume (SV) and heart rate (HR) were performed, thereof calculating body weight indexed SV (=SV*) and CO (=CO*) for all patients and the subgroups. Method comparison was performed by Bland–Altman plot, method precision expressed by calculation of the coefficient of variation (CV). Results: Mean CO* in all patients was 256.4 ± 44.8 (TTE) and 265.3 ± 48.8 (EV) ml/kg/min. Bias and precision were clinically acceptable, limits of agreement within the 30% criterion for method interchangeability (17). According to their different anatomic dimensions and pathophysiology, there were significant differences of SV(*), HR, and CO* for LBW and VLBW infants as well for inotropic treatment and ventilation mode. Conclusion: Extending recent publications on EV/TTE comparison in newborns, this study suggests that EV is also applicable in LWB/VLBW infants as a safe and easy to handle method for continuous CO monitoring in the NICU and PCICU.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3971202
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39712022014-04-10 Non-Invasive Cardiac Output Measurement in Low and Very Low Birth Weight Infants: A Method Comparison Grollmuss, Oswin Gonzalez, Patricia Front Pediatr Pediatrics Background: Cardiac output (CO) measurement in low (LBW) and very low (VLBW) birth weight infants is difficult. Hitherto, sporadical transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) is the only non-invasive measurement method. Electrical velocimetry (EV) has been evaluated as an alternative in normal weight newborns. Objectives: The study was designed to evaluate if EV could be interchangeable with TTE even in LBW and VLBW infants. Methods: In 28 (17 LBW, 11 VLBW) pre-mature newborns, n = 228 simultaneous TTE (trans-aortic Doppler), and EV measurements (134 LBW, 94 VLBW) of stroke volume (SV) and heart rate (HR) were performed, thereof calculating body weight indexed SV (=SV*) and CO (=CO*) for all patients and the subgroups. Method comparison was performed by Bland–Altman plot, method precision expressed by calculation of the coefficient of variation (CV). Results: Mean CO* in all patients was 256.4 ± 44.8 (TTE) and 265.3 ± 48.8 (EV) ml/kg/min. Bias and precision were clinically acceptable, limits of agreement within the 30% criterion for method interchangeability (17). According to their different anatomic dimensions and pathophysiology, there were significant differences of SV(*), HR, and CO* for LBW and VLBW infants as well for inotropic treatment and ventilation mode. Conclusion: Extending recent publications on EV/TTE comparison in newborns, this study suggests that EV is also applicable in LWB/VLBW infants as a safe and easy to handle method for continuous CO monitoring in the NICU and PCICU. Frontiers Media S.A. 2014-03-25 /pmc/articles/PMC3971202/ /pubmed/24724074 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fped.2014.00016 Text en Copyright © 2014 Grollmuss and Gonzalez. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Pediatrics
Grollmuss, Oswin
Gonzalez, Patricia
Non-Invasive Cardiac Output Measurement in Low and Very Low Birth Weight Infants: A Method Comparison
title Non-Invasive Cardiac Output Measurement in Low and Very Low Birth Weight Infants: A Method Comparison
title_full Non-Invasive Cardiac Output Measurement in Low and Very Low Birth Weight Infants: A Method Comparison
title_fullStr Non-Invasive Cardiac Output Measurement in Low and Very Low Birth Weight Infants: A Method Comparison
title_full_unstemmed Non-Invasive Cardiac Output Measurement in Low and Very Low Birth Weight Infants: A Method Comparison
title_short Non-Invasive Cardiac Output Measurement in Low and Very Low Birth Weight Infants: A Method Comparison
title_sort non-invasive cardiac output measurement in low and very low birth weight infants: a method comparison
topic Pediatrics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3971202/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24724074
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fped.2014.00016
work_keys_str_mv AT grollmussoswin noninvasivecardiacoutputmeasurementinlowandverylowbirthweightinfantsamethodcomparison
AT gonzalezpatricia noninvasivecardiacoutputmeasurementinlowandverylowbirthweightinfantsamethodcomparison