Cargando…
Treating infant colic with the probiotic Lactobacillus reuteri: double blind, placebo controlled randomised trial
Objective To determine whether the probiotic Lactobacillus reuteri DSM 17938 reduces crying or fussing in a broad community based sample of breastfed infants and formula fed infants with colic aged less than 3 months. Design Double blind, placebo controlled randomised trial. Setting Community based...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3972414/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24690625 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.g2107 |
_version_ | 1782309584238542848 |
---|---|
author | Sung, Valerie Hiscock, Harriet Tang, Mimi L K Mensah, Fiona K Nation, Monica L Satzke, Catherine Heine, Ralf G Stock, Amanda Barr, Ronald G Wake, Melissa |
author_facet | Sung, Valerie Hiscock, Harriet Tang, Mimi L K Mensah, Fiona K Nation, Monica L Satzke, Catherine Heine, Ralf G Stock, Amanda Barr, Ronald G Wake, Melissa |
author_sort | Sung, Valerie |
collection | PubMed |
description | Objective To determine whether the probiotic Lactobacillus reuteri DSM 17938 reduces crying or fussing in a broad community based sample of breastfed infants and formula fed infants with colic aged less than 3 months. Design Double blind, placebo controlled randomised trial. Setting Community based sample (primary and secondary level care centres) in Melbourne, Australia. Participants 167 breastfed infants or formula fed infants aged less than 3 months meeting Wessel’s criteria for crying or fussing: 85 were randomised to receive probiotic and 82 to receive placebo. Interventions Oral daily L reuteri (1×10(8) colony forming units) versus placebo for one month. Main outcomes measures The primary outcome was daily duration of cry or fuss at 1 month. Secondary outcomes were duration of cry or fuss; number of cry or fuss episodes; sleep duration of infant at 7, 14, and 21 days, and 1 and 6 months; maternal mental health (Edinburgh postnatal depression subscale); family functioning (paediatric quality of life inventory), parent quality adjusted life years (assessment of quality of life) at 1 and 6 months; infant functioning (paediatric quality of life inventory) at 6 months; infant faecal microbiota (microbial diversity, colonisation with Escherichia coli), and calprotectin levels at 1 month. In intention to treat analyses the two groups were compared using regression models adjusted for potential confounders. Results Of 167 infants randomised from August 2011 to August 2012, 127 (76%) were retained to primary outcome; of these, a subset was analysed for faecal microbial diversity, E coli colonisation, and calprotectin levels. Adherence was high. Mean daily cry or fuss time fell steadily in both groups. At 1 month, the probiotic group cried or fussed 49 minutes more than the placebo group (95% confidence interval 8 to 90 minutes, P=0.02); this mainly reflected more fussing, especially for formula fed infants. The groups were similar on all secondary outcomes. No study related adverse events occurred. Conclusions L reuteri DSM 17938 did not benefit a community sample of breastfed infants and formula fed infants with colic. These findings differ from previous smaller trials of selected populations and do not support a general recommendation for the use of probiotics to treat colic in infants. Trial registration Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN95287767. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3972414 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group Ltd. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-39724142014-04-04 Treating infant colic with the probiotic Lactobacillus reuteri: double blind, placebo controlled randomised trial Sung, Valerie Hiscock, Harriet Tang, Mimi L K Mensah, Fiona K Nation, Monica L Satzke, Catherine Heine, Ralf G Stock, Amanda Barr, Ronald G Wake, Melissa BMJ Research Objective To determine whether the probiotic Lactobacillus reuteri DSM 17938 reduces crying or fussing in a broad community based sample of breastfed infants and formula fed infants with colic aged less than 3 months. Design Double blind, placebo controlled randomised trial. Setting Community based sample (primary and secondary level care centres) in Melbourne, Australia. Participants 167 breastfed infants or formula fed infants aged less than 3 months meeting Wessel’s criteria for crying or fussing: 85 were randomised to receive probiotic and 82 to receive placebo. Interventions Oral daily L reuteri (1×10(8) colony forming units) versus placebo for one month. Main outcomes measures The primary outcome was daily duration of cry or fuss at 1 month. Secondary outcomes were duration of cry or fuss; number of cry or fuss episodes; sleep duration of infant at 7, 14, and 21 days, and 1 and 6 months; maternal mental health (Edinburgh postnatal depression subscale); family functioning (paediatric quality of life inventory), parent quality adjusted life years (assessment of quality of life) at 1 and 6 months; infant functioning (paediatric quality of life inventory) at 6 months; infant faecal microbiota (microbial diversity, colonisation with Escherichia coli), and calprotectin levels at 1 month. In intention to treat analyses the two groups were compared using regression models adjusted for potential confounders. Results Of 167 infants randomised from August 2011 to August 2012, 127 (76%) were retained to primary outcome; of these, a subset was analysed for faecal microbial diversity, E coli colonisation, and calprotectin levels. Adherence was high. Mean daily cry or fuss time fell steadily in both groups. At 1 month, the probiotic group cried or fussed 49 minutes more than the placebo group (95% confidence interval 8 to 90 minutes, P=0.02); this mainly reflected more fussing, especially for formula fed infants. The groups were similar on all secondary outcomes. No study related adverse events occurred. Conclusions L reuteri DSM 17938 did not benefit a community sample of breastfed infants and formula fed infants with colic. These findings differ from previous smaller trials of selected populations and do not support a general recommendation for the use of probiotics to treat colic in infants. Trial registration Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN95287767. BMJ Publishing Group Ltd. 2014-04-01 /pmc/articles/PMC3972414/ /pubmed/24690625 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.g2107 Text en © Sung et al 2014 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 3.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/. |
spellingShingle | Research Sung, Valerie Hiscock, Harriet Tang, Mimi L K Mensah, Fiona K Nation, Monica L Satzke, Catherine Heine, Ralf G Stock, Amanda Barr, Ronald G Wake, Melissa Treating infant colic with the probiotic Lactobacillus reuteri: double blind, placebo controlled randomised trial |
title | Treating infant colic with the probiotic Lactobacillus reuteri: double blind, placebo controlled randomised trial |
title_full | Treating infant colic with the probiotic Lactobacillus reuteri: double blind, placebo controlled randomised trial |
title_fullStr | Treating infant colic with the probiotic Lactobacillus reuteri: double blind, placebo controlled randomised trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Treating infant colic with the probiotic Lactobacillus reuteri: double blind, placebo controlled randomised trial |
title_short | Treating infant colic with the probiotic Lactobacillus reuteri: double blind, placebo controlled randomised trial |
title_sort | treating infant colic with the probiotic lactobacillus reuteri: double blind, placebo controlled randomised trial |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3972414/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24690625 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.g2107 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sungvalerie treatinginfantcolicwiththeprobioticlactobacillusreuteridoubleblindplacebocontrolledrandomisedtrial AT hiscockharriet treatinginfantcolicwiththeprobioticlactobacillusreuteridoubleblindplacebocontrolledrandomisedtrial AT tangmimilk treatinginfantcolicwiththeprobioticlactobacillusreuteridoubleblindplacebocontrolledrandomisedtrial AT mensahfionak treatinginfantcolicwiththeprobioticlactobacillusreuteridoubleblindplacebocontrolledrandomisedtrial AT nationmonical treatinginfantcolicwiththeprobioticlactobacillusreuteridoubleblindplacebocontrolledrandomisedtrial AT satzkecatherine treatinginfantcolicwiththeprobioticlactobacillusreuteridoubleblindplacebocontrolledrandomisedtrial AT heineralfg treatinginfantcolicwiththeprobioticlactobacillusreuteridoubleblindplacebocontrolledrandomisedtrial AT stockamanda treatinginfantcolicwiththeprobioticlactobacillusreuteridoubleblindplacebocontrolledrandomisedtrial AT barrronaldg treatinginfantcolicwiththeprobioticlactobacillusreuteridoubleblindplacebocontrolledrandomisedtrial AT wakemelissa treatinginfantcolicwiththeprobioticlactobacillusreuteridoubleblindplacebocontrolledrandomisedtrial |