Cargando…

Treating infant colic with the probiotic Lactobacillus reuteri: double blind, placebo controlled randomised trial

Objective To determine whether the probiotic Lactobacillus reuteri DSM 17938 reduces crying or fussing in a broad community based sample of breastfed infants and formula fed infants with colic aged less than 3 months. Design Double blind, placebo controlled randomised trial. Setting Community based...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sung, Valerie, Hiscock, Harriet, Tang, Mimi L K, Mensah, Fiona K, Nation, Monica L, Satzke, Catherine, Heine, Ralf G, Stock, Amanda, Barr, Ronald G, Wake, Melissa
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group Ltd. 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3972414/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24690625
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.g2107
_version_ 1782309584238542848
author Sung, Valerie
Hiscock, Harriet
Tang, Mimi L K
Mensah, Fiona K
Nation, Monica L
Satzke, Catherine
Heine, Ralf G
Stock, Amanda
Barr, Ronald G
Wake, Melissa
author_facet Sung, Valerie
Hiscock, Harriet
Tang, Mimi L K
Mensah, Fiona K
Nation, Monica L
Satzke, Catherine
Heine, Ralf G
Stock, Amanda
Barr, Ronald G
Wake, Melissa
author_sort Sung, Valerie
collection PubMed
description Objective To determine whether the probiotic Lactobacillus reuteri DSM 17938 reduces crying or fussing in a broad community based sample of breastfed infants and formula fed infants with colic aged less than 3 months. Design Double blind, placebo controlled randomised trial. Setting Community based sample (primary and secondary level care centres) in Melbourne, Australia. Participants 167 breastfed infants or formula fed infants aged less than 3 months meeting Wessel’s criteria for crying or fussing: 85 were randomised to receive probiotic and 82 to receive placebo. Interventions Oral daily L reuteri (1×10(8) colony forming units) versus placebo for one month. Main outcomes measures The primary outcome was daily duration of cry or fuss at 1 month. Secondary outcomes were duration of cry or fuss; number of cry or fuss episodes; sleep duration of infant at 7, 14, and 21 days, and 1 and 6 months; maternal mental health (Edinburgh postnatal depression subscale); family functioning (paediatric quality of life inventory), parent quality adjusted life years (assessment of quality of life) at 1 and 6 months; infant functioning (paediatric quality of life inventory) at 6 months; infant faecal microbiota (microbial diversity, colonisation with Escherichia coli), and calprotectin levels at 1 month. In intention to treat analyses the two groups were compared using regression models adjusted for potential confounders. Results Of 167 infants randomised from August 2011 to August 2012, 127 (76%) were retained to primary outcome; of these, a subset was analysed for faecal microbial diversity, E coli colonisation, and calprotectin levels. Adherence was high. Mean daily cry or fuss time fell steadily in both groups. At 1 month, the probiotic group cried or fussed 49 minutes more than the placebo group (95% confidence interval 8 to 90 minutes, P=0.02); this mainly reflected more fussing, especially for formula fed infants. The groups were similar on all secondary outcomes. No study related adverse events occurred. Conclusions L reuteri DSM 17938 did not benefit a community sample of breastfed infants and formula fed infants with colic. These findings differ from previous smaller trials of selected populations and do not support a general recommendation for the use of probiotics to treat colic in infants. Trial registration Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN95287767.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3972414
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39724142014-04-04 Treating infant colic with the probiotic Lactobacillus reuteri: double blind, placebo controlled randomised trial Sung, Valerie Hiscock, Harriet Tang, Mimi L K Mensah, Fiona K Nation, Monica L Satzke, Catherine Heine, Ralf G Stock, Amanda Barr, Ronald G Wake, Melissa BMJ Research Objective To determine whether the probiotic Lactobacillus reuteri DSM 17938 reduces crying or fussing in a broad community based sample of breastfed infants and formula fed infants with colic aged less than 3 months. Design Double blind, placebo controlled randomised trial. Setting Community based sample (primary and secondary level care centres) in Melbourne, Australia. Participants 167 breastfed infants or formula fed infants aged less than 3 months meeting Wessel’s criteria for crying or fussing: 85 were randomised to receive probiotic and 82 to receive placebo. Interventions Oral daily L reuteri (1×10(8) colony forming units) versus placebo for one month. Main outcomes measures The primary outcome was daily duration of cry or fuss at 1 month. Secondary outcomes were duration of cry or fuss; number of cry or fuss episodes; sleep duration of infant at 7, 14, and 21 days, and 1 and 6 months; maternal mental health (Edinburgh postnatal depression subscale); family functioning (paediatric quality of life inventory), parent quality adjusted life years (assessment of quality of life) at 1 and 6 months; infant functioning (paediatric quality of life inventory) at 6 months; infant faecal microbiota (microbial diversity, colonisation with Escherichia coli), and calprotectin levels at 1 month. In intention to treat analyses the two groups were compared using regression models adjusted for potential confounders. Results Of 167 infants randomised from August 2011 to August 2012, 127 (76%) were retained to primary outcome; of these, a subset was analysed for faecal microbial diversity, E coli colonisation, and calprotectin levels. Adherence was high. Mean daily cry or fuss time fell steadily in both groups. At 1 month, the probiotic group cried or fussed 49 minutes more than the placebo group (95% confidence interval 8 to 90 minutes, P=0.02); this mainly reflected more fussing, especially for formula fed infants. The groups were similar on all secondary outcomes. No study related adverse events occurred. Conclusions L reuteri DSM 17938 did not benefit a community sample of breastfed infants and formula fed infants with colic. These findings differ from previous smaller trials of selected populations and do not support a general recommendation for the use of probiotics to treat colic in infants. Trial registration Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN95287767. BMJ Publishing Group Ltd. 2014-04-01 /pmc/articles/PMC3972414/ /pubmed/24690625 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.g2107 Text en © Sung et al 2014 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 3.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/.
spellingShingle Research
Sung, Valerie
Hiscock, Harriet
Tang, Mimi L K
Mensah, Fiona K
Nation, Monica L
Satzke, Catherine
Heine, Ralf G
Stock, Amanda
Barr, Ronald G
Wake, Melissa
Treating infant colic with the probiotic Lactobacillus reuteri: double blind, placebo controlled randomised trial
title Treating infant colic with the probiotic Lactobacillus reuteri: double blind, placebo controlled randomised trial
title_full Treating infant colic with the probiotic Lactobacillus reuteri: double blind, placebo controlled randomised trial
title_fullStr Treating infant colic with the probiotic Lactobacillus reuteri: double blind, placebo controlled randomised trial
title_full_unstemmed Treating infant colic with the probiotic Lactobacillus reuteri: double blind, placebo controlled randomised trial
title_short Treating infant colic with the probiotic Lactobacillus reuteri: double blind, placebo controlled randomised trial
title_sort treating infant colic with the probiotic lactobacillus reuteri: double blind, placebo controlled randomised trial
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3972414/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24690625
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.g2107
work_keys_str_mv AT sungvalerie treatinginfantcolicwiththeprobioticlactobacillusreuteridoubleblindplacebocontrolledrandomisedtrial
AT hiscockharriet treatinginfantcolicwiththeprobioticlactobacillusreuteridoubleblindplacebocontrolledrandomisedtrial
AT tangmimilk treatinginfantcolicwiththeprobioticlactobacillusreuteridoubleblindplacebocontrolledrandomisedtrial
AT mensahfionak treatinginfantcolicwiththeprobioticlactobacillusreuteridoubleblindplacebocontrolledrandomisedtrial
AT nationmonical treatinginfantcolicwiththeprobioticlactobacillusreuteridoubleblindplacebocontrolledrandomisedtrial
AT satzkecatherine treatinginfantcolicwiththeprobioticlactobacillusreuteridoubleblindplacebocontrolledrandomisedtrial
AT heineralfg treatinginfantcolicwiththeprobioticlactobacillusreuteridoubleblindplacebocontrolledrandomisedtrial
AT stockamanda treatinginfantcolicwiththeprobioticlactobacillusreuteridoubleblindplacebocontrolledrandomisedtrial
AT barrronaldg treatinginfantcolicwiththeprobioticlactobacillusreuteridoubleblindplacebocontrolledrandomisedtrial
AT wakemelissa treatinginfantcolicwiththeprobioticlactobacillusreuteridoubleblindplacebocontrolledrandomisedtrial