Cargando…

Both attention and prediction are necessary for adaptive neuronal tuning in sensory processing

The brain as a proactive system processes sensory information under the top-down influence of attention and prediction. However, the relation between attention and prediction remains undetermined given the conflation of these two mechanisms in the literature. To evaluate whether attention and predic...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hsu, Yi-Fang, Hämäläinen, Jarmo A., Waszak, Florian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3972470/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24723871
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00152
_version_ 1782309595403780096
author Hsu, Yi-Fang
Hämäläinen, Jarmo A.
Waszak, Florian
author_facet Hsu, Yi-Fang
Hämäläinen, Jarmo A.
Waszak, Florian
author_sort Hsu, Yi-Fang
collection PubMed
description The brain as a proactive system processes sensory information under the top-down influence of attention and prediction. However, the relation between attention and prediction remains undetermined given the conflation of these two mechanisms in the literature. To evaluate whether attention and prediction are dependent of each other, and if so, how these two top-down mechanisms may interact in sensory processing, we orthogonally manipulated attention and prediction in a target detection task. Participants were instructed to pay attention to one of two interleaved stimulus streams of predictable/unpredictable tone frequency. We found that attention and prediction interacted on the amplitude of the N1 ERP component. The N1 amplitude in the attended/predictable condition was larger than that in any of the other conditions. Dipole source localization analysis showed that the effect came from the activation in bilateral auditory areas. No significant effect was found in the P2 time window. Our results suggest that attention and prediction are dependent of each other. While attention might determine the overall cortical responsiveness to stimuli when prediction is involved, prediction might provide an anchor for the modulation of the synaptic input strengths which needs to be operated on the basis of attention.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3972470
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39724702014-04-10 Both attention and prediction are necessary for adaptive neuronal tuning in sensory processing Hsu, Yi-Fang Hämäläinen, Jarmo A. Waszak, Florian Front Hum Neurosci Neuroscience The brain as a proactive system processes sensory information under the top-down influence of attention and prediction. However, the relation between attention and prediction remains undetermined given the conflation of these two mechanisms in the literature. To evaluate whether attention and prediction are dependent of each other, and if so, how these two top-down mechanisms may interact in sensory processing, we orthogonally manipulated attention and prediction in a target detection task. Participants were instructed to pay attention to one of two interleaved stimulus streams of predictable/unpredictable tone frequency. We found that attention and prediction interacted on the amplitude of the N1 ERP component. The N1 amplitude in the attended/predictable condition was larger than that in any of the other conditions. Dipole source localization analysis showed that the effect came from the activation in bilateral auditory areas. No significant effect was found in the P2 time window. Our results suggest that attention and prediction are dependent of each other. While attention might determine the overall cortical responsiveness to stimuli when prediction is involved, prediction might provide an anchor for the modulation of the synaptic input strengths which needs to be operated on the basis of attention. Frontiers Media S.A. 2014-03-26 /pmc/articles/PMC3972470/ /pubmed/24723871 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00152 Text en Copyright © 2014 Hsu, Hämäläinen and Waszak. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Hsu, Yi-Fang
Hämäläinen, Jarmo A.
Waszak, Florian
Both attention and prediction are necessary for adaptive neuronal tuning in sensory processing
title Both attention and prediction are necessary for adaptive neuronal tuning in sensory processing
title_full Both attention and prediction are necessary for adaptive neuronal tuning in sensory processing
title_fullStr Both attention and prediction are necessary for adaptive neuronal tuning in sensory processing
title_full_unstemmed Both attention and prediction are necessary for adaptive neuronal tuning in sensory processing
title_short Both attention and prediction are necessary for adaptive neuronal tuning in sensory processing
title_sort both attention and prediction are necessary for adaptive neuronal tuning in sensory processing
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3972470/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24723871
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00152
work_keys_str_mv AT hsuyifang bothattentionandpredictionarenecessaryforadaptiveneuronaltuninginsensoryprocessing
AT hamalainenjarmoa bothattentionandpredictionarenecessaryforadaptiveneuronaltuninginsensoryprocessing
AT waszakflorian bothattentionandpredictionarenecessaryforadaptiveneuronaltuninginsensoryprocessing