Cargando…
Both attention and prediction are necessary for adaptive neuronal tuning in sensory processing
The brain as a proactive system processes sensory information under the top-down influence of attention and prediction. However, the relation between attention and prediction remains undetermined given the conflation of these two mechanisms in the literature. To evaluate whether attention and predic...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3972470/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24723871 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00152 |
_version_ | 1782309595403780096 |
---|---|
author | Hsu, Yi-Fang Hämäläinen, Jarmo A. Waszak, Florian |
author_facet | Hsu, Yi-Fang Hämäläinen, Jarmo A. Waszak, Florian |
author_sort | Hsu, Yi-Fang |
collection | PubMed |
description | The brain as a proactive system processes sensory information under the top-down influence of attention and prediction. However, the relation between attention and prediction remains undetermined given the conflation of these two mechanisms in the literature. To evaluate whether attention and prediction are dependent of each other, and if so, how these two top-down mechanisms may interact in sensory processing, we orthogonally manipulated attention and prediction in a target detection task. Participants were instructed to pay attention to one of two interleaved stimulus streams of predictable/unpredictable tone frequency. We found that attention and prediction interacted on the amplitude of the N1 ERP component. The N1 amplitude in the attended/predictable condition was larger than that in any of the other conditions. Dipole source localization analysis showed that the effect came from the activation in bilateral auditory areas. No significant effect was found in the P2 time window. Our results suggest that attention and prediction are dependent of each other. While attention might determine the overall cortical responsiveness to stimuli when prediction is involved, prediction might provide an anchor for the modulation of the synaptic input strengths which needs to be operated on the basis of attention. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3972470 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-39724702014-04-10 Both attention and prediction are necessary for adaptive neuronal tuning in sensory processing Hsu, Yi-Fang Hämäläinen, Jarmo A. Waszak, Florian Front Hum Neurosci Neuroscience The brain as a proactive system processes sensory information under the top-down influence of attention and prediction. However, the relation between attention and prediction remains undetermined given the conflation of these two mechanisms in the literature. To evaluate whether attention and prediction are dependent of each other, and if so, how these two top-down mechanisms may interact in sensory processing, we orthogonally manipulated attention and prediction in a target detection task. Participants were instructed to pay attention to one of two interleaved stimulus streams of predictable/unpredictable tone frequency. We found that attention and prediction interacted on the amplitude of the N1 ERP component. The N1 amplitude in the attended/predictable condition was larger than that in any of the other conditions. Dipole source localization analysis showed that the effect came from the activation in bilateral auditory areas. No significant effect was found in the P2 time window. Our results suggest that attention and prediction are dependent of each other. While attention might determine the overall cortical responsiveness to stimuli when prediction is involved, prediction might provide an anchor for the modulation of the synaptic input strengths which needs to be operated on the basis of attention. Frontiers Media S.A. 2014-03-26 /pmc/articles/PMC3972470/ /pubmed/24723871 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00152 Text en Copyright © 2014 Hsu, Hämäläinen and Waszak. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Neuroscience Hsu, Yi-Fang Hämäläinen, Jarmo A. Waszak, Florian Both attention and prediction are necessary for adaptive neuronal tuning in sensory processing |
title | Both attention and prediction are necessary for adaptive neuronal tuning in sensory processing |
title_full | Both attention and prediction are necessary for adaptive neuronal tuning in sensory processing |
title_fullStr | Both attention and prediction are necessary for adaptive neuronal tuning in sensory processing |
title_full_unstemmed | Both attention and prediction are necessary for adaptive neuronal tuning in sensory processing |
title_short | Both attention and prediction are necessary for adaptive neuronal tuning in sensory processing |
title_sort | both attention and prediction are necessary for adaptive neuronal tuning in sensory processing |
topic | Neuroscience |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3972470/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24723871 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00152 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hsuyifang bothattentionandpredictionarenecessaryforadaptiveneuronaltuninginsensoryprocessing AT hamalainenjarmoa bothattentionandpredictionarenecessaryforadaptiveneuronaltuninginsensoryprocessing AT waszakflorian bothattentionandpredictionarenecessaryforadaptiveneuronaltuninginsensoryprocessing |