Cargando…

The effectiveness of chemical denture cleansers and ultrasonic device in biofilm removal from complete dentures

Adequate denture hygiene can prevent and treat infection in edentulous patients. They are usually elderly and have difficulty for brushing their teeth. OBJECTIVE: This study evaluated the efficacy of complete denture biofilm removal using chemical (alkaline peroxide-effervescent tablets), mechanical...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: CRUZ, Patrícia Costa, de ANDRADE, Ingrid Machado, PERACINI, Amanda, de SOUZA-GUGELMIN, Maria Cristina Monteiro, SILVA-LOVATO, Cláudia Helena, de SOUZA, Raphael Freitas, PARANHOS, Helena de Freitas Oliveira
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Faculdade de Odontologia de Bauru da Universidade de São Paulo 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3973472/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22231005
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1678-77572011000600021
_version_ 1782479327881854976
author CRUZ, Patrícia Costa
de ANDRADE, Ingrid Machado
PERACINI, Amanda
de SOUZA-GUGELMIN, Maria Cristina Monteiro
SILVA-LOVATO, Cláudia Helena
de SOUZA, Raphael Freitas
PARANHOS, Helena de Freitas Oliveira
author_facet CRUZ, Patrícia Costa
de ANDRADE, Ingrid Machado
PERACINI, Amanda
de SOUZA-GUGELMIN, Maria Cristina Monteiro
SILVA-LOVATO, Cláudia Helena
de SOUZA, Raphael Freitas
PARANHOS, Helena de Freitas Oliveira
author_sort CRUZ, Patrícia Costa
collection PubMed
description Adequate denture hygiene can prevent and treat infection in edentulous patients. They are usually elderly and have difficulty for brushing their teeth. OBJECTIVE: This study evaluated the efficacy of complete denture biofilm removal using chemical (alkaline peroxide-effervescent tablets), mechanical (ultrasonic) and combined (association of the effervescent and ultrasonic) methods. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Eighty complete denture wearers participated in the experiment for 21 days. They were distributed into 4 groups (n=20): (1) Brushing with water (Control); (2) Effervescent tablets (Corega Tabs); (3) Ultrasonic device (Ultrasonic Cleaner, model 2840 D); (4) Association of effervescent tablets and ultrasonic device. All groups brushed their dentures with a specific brush (Bitufo) and water, 3 times a day, before applying their treatments. Denture biofilm was collected at baseline and after 21 days. To quantify the biofilm, the internal surfaces of the maxillary complete dentures were stained and photographed at 45º. The photographs were processed and the areas (total internal surface stained with biofilm) quantified (Image Tool 2.02). The percentage of the biofilm was calculated by the ratio between the biofilm area multiplied by 100 and the total area of the internal surface of the maxillary complete denture. RESULTS: The Kruskal-Wallis test was used for comparison among groups followed by the Dunn multiple-comparison test. All tests were performed respecting a significance level of 0.05. Significant difference was found among the treatments (KW=21.18; P<0.001), the mean ranks for the treatments and results for Dunn multiple comparison test were: Control (60.9); Chemical (37.2); Mechanical (35.2) and Combined (29.1). CONCLUSION: The experimental methods were equally effective regarding the ability to remove biofilm and were superior to the control method (brushing with water). Immersion in alkaline peroxide and ultrasonic vibration can be used as auxiliary agents for cleaning complete dentures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3973472
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Faculdade de Odontologia de Bauru da Universidade de São Paulo
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39734722014-04-03 The effectiveness of chemical denture cleansers and ultrasonic device in biofilm removal from complete dentures CRUZ, Patrícia Costa de ANDRADE, Ingrid Machado PERACINI, Amanda de SOUZA-GUGELMIN, Maria Cristina Monteiro SILVA-LOVATO, Cláudia Helena de SOUZA, Raphael Freitas PARANHOS, Helena de Freitas Oliveira J Appl Oral Sci Original Articles Adequate denture hygiene can prevent and treat infection in edentulous patients. They are usually elderly and have difficulty for brushing their teeth. OBJECTIVE: This study evaluated the efficacy of complete denture biofilm removal using chemical (alkaline peroxide-effervescent tablets), mechanical (ultrasonic) and combined (association of the effervescent and ultrasonic) methods. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Eighty complete denture wearers participated in the experiment for 21 days. They were distributed into 4 groups (n=20): (1) Brushing with water (Control); (2) Effervescent tablets (Corega Tabs); (3) Ultrasonic device (Ultrasonic Cleaner, model 2840 D); (4) Association of effervescent tablets and ultrasonic device. All groups brushed their dentures with a specific brush (Bitufo) and water, 3 times a day, before applying their treatments. Denture biofilm was collected at baseline and after 21 days. To quantify the biofilm, the internal surfaces of the maxillary complete dentures were stained and photographed at 45º. The photographs were processed and the areas (total internal surface stained with biofilm) quantified (Image Tool 2.02). The percentage of the biofilm was calculated by the ratio between the biofilm area multiplied by 100 and the total area of the internal surface of the maxillary complete denture. RESULTS: The Kruskal-Wallis test was used for comparison among groups followed by the Dunn multiple-comparison test. All tests were performed respecting a significance level of 0.05. Significant difference was found among the treatments (KW=21.18; P<0.001), the mean ranks for the treatments and results for Dunn multiple comparison test were: Control (60.9); Chemical (37.2); Mechanical (35.2) and Combined (29.1). CONCLUSION: The experimental methods were equally effective regarding the ability to remove biofilm and were superior to the control method (brushing with water). Immersion in alkaline peroxide and ultrasonic vibration can be used as auxiliary agents for cleaning complete dentures. Faculdade de Odontologia de Bauru da Universidade de São Paulo 2011 /pmc/articles/PMC3973472/ /pubmed/22231005 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1678-77572011000600021 Text en http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
CRUZ, Patrícia Costa
de ANDRADE, Ingrid Machado
PERACINI, Amanda
de SOUZA-GUGELMIN, Maria Cristina Monteiro
SILVA-LOVATO, Cláudia Helena
de SOUZA, Raphael Freitas
PARANHOS, Helena de Freitas Oliveira
The effectiveness of chemical denture cleansers and ultrasonic device in biofilm removal from complete dentures
title The effectiveness of chemical denture cleansers and ultrasonic device in biofilm removal from complete dentures
title_full The effectiveness of chemical denture cleansers and ultrasonic device in biofilm removal from complete dentures
title_fullStr The effectiveness of chemical denture cleansers and ultrasonic device in biofilm removal from complete dentures
title_full_unstemmed The effectiveness of chemical denture cleansers and ultrasonic device in biofilm removal from complete dentures
title_short The effectiveness of chemical denture cleansers and ultrasonic device in biofilm removal from complete dentures
title_sort effectiveness of chemical denture cleansers and ultrasonic device in biofilm removal from complete dentures
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3973472/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22231005
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1678-77572011000600021
work_keys_str_mv AT cruzpatriciacosta theeffectivenessofchemicaldenturecleansersandultrasonicdeviceinbiofilmremovalfromcompletedentures
AT deandradeingridmachado theeffectivenessofchemicaldenturecleansersandultrasonicdeviceinbiofilmremovalfromcompletedentures
AT peraciniamanda theeffectivenessofchemicaldenturecleansersandultrasonicdeviceinbiofilmremovalfromcompletedentures
AT desouzagugelminmariacristinamonteiro theeffectivenessofchemicaldenturecleansersandultrasonicdeviceinbiofilmremovalfromcompletedentures
AT silvalovatoclaudiahelena theeffectivenessofchemicaldenturecleansersandultrasonicdeviceinbiofilmremovalfromcompletedentures
AT desouzaraphaelfreitas theeffectivenessofchemicaldenturecleansersandultrasonicdeviceinbiofilmremovalfromcompletedentures
AT paranhoshelenadefreitasoliveira theeffectivenessofchemicaldenturecleansersandultrasonicdeviceinbiofilmremovalfromcompletedentures
AT cruzpatriciacosta effectivenessofchemicaldenturecleansersandultrasonicdeviceinbiofilmremovalfromcompletedentures
AT deandradeingridmachado effectivenessofchemicaldenturecleansersandultrasonicdeviceinbiofilmremovalfromcompletedentures
AT peraciniamanda effectivenessofchemicaldenturecleansersandultrasonicdeviceinbiofilmremovalfromcompletedentures
AT desouzagugelminmariacristinamonteiro effectivenessofchemicaldenturecleansersandultrasonicdeviceinbiofilmremovalfromcompletedentures
AT silvalovatoclaudiahelena effectivenessofchemicaldenturecleansersandultrasonicdeviceinbiofilmremovalfromcompletedentures
AT desouzaraphaelfreitas effectivenessofchemicaldenturecleansersandultrasonicdeviceinbiofilmremovalfromcompletedentures
AT paranhoshelenadefreitasoliveira effectivenessofchemicaldenturecleansersandultrasonicdeviceinbiofilmremovalfromcompletedentures