Cargando…
Physical activity and inactivity patterns in India – results from the ICMR-INDIAB study (Phase-1) [ICMR-INDIAB-5]
BACKGROUND: The rising prevalence of diabetes and obesity in India can be attributed, at least in part, to increasing levels of physical inactivity. However, there has been no nationwide survey in India on physical activity levels involving both the urban and rural areas in whole states of India. Th...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3974063/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24571915 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1479-5868-11-26 |
_version_ | 1782479423650398208 |
---|---|
author | Anjana, Ranjit M Pradeepa, Rajendra Das, Ashok K Deepa, Mohan Bhansali, Anil Joshi, Shashank R Joshi, Prashant P Dhandhania, Vinay K Rao, Paturi V Sudha, Vasudevan Subashini, Radhakrishnan Unnikrishnan, Ranjit Madhu, Sri V Kaur, Tanvir Mohan, Viswanathan Shukla, Deepak K |
author_facet | Anjana, Ranjit M Pradeepa, Rajendra Das, Ashok K Deepa, Mohan Bhansali, Anil Joshi, Shashank R Joshi, Prashant P Dhandhania, Vinay K Rao, Paturi V Sudha, Vasudevan Subashini, Radhakrishnan Unnikrishnan, Ranjit Madhu, Sri V Kaur, Tanvir Mohan, Viswanathan Shukla, Deepak K |
author_sort | Anjana, Ranjit M |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The rising prevalence of diabetes and obesity in India can be attributed, at least in part, to increasing levels of physical inactivity. However, there has been no nationwide survey in India on physical activity levels involving both the urban and rural areas in whole states of India. The aim of the present study was to assess physical activity patterns across India - as part of the Indian Council of Medical Research-India Diabetes (ICMR-INDIAB) study. METHODS: Phase 1 of the ICMR-INDIAB study was conducted in four regions of India (Tamilnadu, Maharashtra, Jharkhand and Chandigarh representing the south, west, east and north of India respectively) with a combined population of 213 million people. Physical activity was assessed using the Global Physical Activity Questionnaire (GPAQ) in 14227 individuals aged ≥ 20 years [urban- 4,173; rural- 10,054], selected from the above regions using a stratified multistage design. RESULTS: Of the 14227 individuals studied, 54.4% (n = 7737) were inactive (males: 41.7%), while 31.9% (n = 4537) (males: 58.3%) were active and 13.7% (n = 1953) (males: 61.3%) were highly active. Subjects were more inactive in urban, compared to rural, areas (65.0% vs. 50.0%; p < 0.001). Males were significantly more active than females (p < 0.001). Subjects in all four regions spent more active minutes at work than in the commuting and recreation domains. Absence of recreational activity was reported by 88.4%, 94.8%, 91.3% and 93.1% of the subjects in Chandigarh, Jharkhand, Maharashtra and Tamilnadu respectively. The percentage of individuals with no recreational activity increased with age (Trend χ(2): 199.1, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The study shows that a large percentage of people in India are inactive with fewer than 10% engaging in recreational physical activity. Therefore, urgent steps need to be initiated to promote physical activity to stem the twin epidemics of diabetes and obesity in India. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3974063 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-39740632014-04-04 Physical activity and inactivity patterns in India – results from the ICMR-INDIAB study (Phase-1) [ICMR-INDIAB-5] Anjana, Ranjit M Pradeepa, Rajendra Das, Ashok K Deepa, Mohan Bhansali, Anil Joshi, Shashank R Joshi, Prashant P Dhandhania, Vinay K Rao, Paturi V Sudha, Vasudevan Subashini, Radhakrishnan Unnikrishnan, Ranjit Madhu, Sri V Kaur, Tanvir Mohan, Viswanathan Shukla, Deepak K Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act Research BACKGROUND: The rising prevalence of diabetes and obesity in India can be attributed, at least in part, to increasing levels of physical inactivity. However, there has been no nationwide survey in India on physical activity levels involving both the urban and rural areas in whole states of India. The aim of the present study was to assess physical activity patterns across India - as part of the Indian Council of Medical Research-India Diabetes (ICMR-INDIAB) study. METHODS: Phase 1 of the ICMR-INDIAB study was conducted in four regions of India (Tamilnadu, Maharashtra, Jharkhand and Chandigarh representing the south, west, east and north of India respectively) with a combined population of 213 million people. Physical activity was assessed using the Global Physical Activity Questionnaire (GPAQ) in 14227 individuals aged ≥ 20 years [urban- 4,173; rural- 10,054], selected from the above regions using a stratified multistage design. RESULTS: Of the 14227 individuals studied, 54.4% (n = 7737) were inactive (males: 41.7%), while 31.9% (n = 4537) (males: 58.3%) were active and 13.7% (n = 1953) (males: 61.3%) were highly active. Subjects were more inactive in urban, compared to rural, areas (65.0% vs. 50.0%; p < 0.001). Males were significantly more active than females (p < 0.001). Subjects in all four regions spent more active minutes at work than in the commuting and recreation domains. Absence of recreational activity was reported by 88.4%, 94.8%, 91.3% and 93.1% of the subjects in Chandigarh, Jharkhand, Maharashtra and Tamilnadu respectively. The percentage of individuals with no recreational activity increased with age (Trend χ(2): 199.1, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The study shows that a large percentage of people in India are inactive with fewer than 10% engaging in recreational physical activity. Therefore, urgent steps need to be initiated to promote physical activity to stem the twin epidemics of diabetes and obesity in India. BioMed Central 2014-02-26 /pmc/articles/PMC3974063/ /pubmed/24571915 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1479-5868-11-26 Text en Copyright © 2014 Anjana et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Anjana, Ranjit M Pradeepa, Rajendra Das, Ashok K Deepa, Mohan Bhansali, Anil Joshi, Shashank R Joshi, Prashant P Dhandhania, Vinay K Rao, Paturi V Sudha, Vasudevan Subashini, Radhakrishnan Unnikrishnan, Ranjit Madhu, Sri V Kaur, Tanvir Mohan, Viswanathan Shukla, Deepak K Physical activity and inactivity patterns in India – results from the ICMR-INDIAB study (Phase-1) [ICMR-INDIAB-5] |
title | Physical activity and inactivity patterns in India – results from the ICMR-INDIAB study (Phase-1) [ICMR-INDIAB-5] |
title_full | Physical activity and inactivity patterns in India – results from the ICMR-INDIAB study (Phase-1) [ICMR-INDIAB-5] |
title_fullStr | Physical activity and inactivity patterns in India – results from the ICMR-INDIAB study (Phase-1) [ICMR-INDIAB-5] |
title_full_unstemmed | Physical activity and inactivity patterns in India – results from the ICMR-INDIAB study (Phase-1) [ICMR-INDIAB-5] |
title_short | Physical activity and inactivity patterns in India – results from the ICMR-INDIAB study (Phase-1) [ICMR-INDIAB-5] |
title_sort | physical activity and inactivity patterns in india – results from the icmr-indiab study (phase-1) [icmr-indiab-5] |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3974063/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24571915 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1479-5868-11-26 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT anjanaranjitm physicalactivityandinactivitypatternsinindiaresultsfromtheicmrindiabstudyphase1icmrindiab5 AT pradeeparajendra physicalactivityandinactivitypatternsinindiaresultsfromtheicmrindiabstudyphase1icmrindiab5 AT dasashokk physicalactivityandinactivitypatternsinindiaresultsfromtheicmrindiabstudyphase1icmrindiab5 AT deepamohan physicalactivityandinactivitypatternsinindiaresultsfromtheicmrindiabstudyphase1icmrindiab5 AT bhansalianil physicalactivityandinactivitypatternsinindiaresultsfromtheicmrindiabstudyphase1icmrindiab5 AT joshishashankr physicalactivityandinactivitypatternsinindiaresultsfromtheicmrindiabstudyphase1icmrindiab5 AT joshiprashantp physicalactivityandinactivitypatternsinindiaresultsfromtheicmrindiabstudyphase1icmrindiab5 AT dhandhaniavinayk physicalactivityandinactivitypatternsinindiaresultsfromtheicmrindiabstudyphase1icmrindiab5 AT raopaturiv physicalactivityandinactivitypatternsinindiaresultsfromtheicmrindiabstudyphase1icmrindiab5 AT sudhavasudevan physicalactivityandinactivitypatternsinindiaresultsfromtheicmrindiabstudyphase1icmrindiab5 AT subashiniradhakrishnan physicalactivityandinactivitypatternsinindiaresultsfromtheicmrindiabstudyphase1icmrindiab5 AT unnikrishnanranjit physicalactivityandinactivitypatternsinindiaresultsfromtheicmrindiabstudyphase1icmrindiab5 AT madhusriv physicalactivityandinactivitypatternsinindiaresultsfromtheicmrindiabstudyphase1icmrindiab5 AT kaurtanvir physicalactivityandinactivitypatternsinindiaresultsfromtheicmrindiabstudyphase1icmrindiab5 AT mohanviswanathan physicalactivityandinactivitypatternsinindiaresultsfromtheicmrindiabstudyphase1icmrindiab5 AT shukladeepakk physicalactivityandinactivitypatternsinindiaresultsfromtheicmrindiabstudyphase1icmrindiab5 |