Cargando…

Reasons for non-uptake and subsequent participation in the NHS Bowel Cancer Screening Programme: a qualitative study

BACKGROUND: Screening for bowel cancer using the guaiac faecal occult blood test offered by the NHS Bowel Cancer Screening Programme (BCSP) is taken up by 54% of the eligible population. Uptake ranges from 35% in the most to 61% in the least deprived areas. This study explores reasons for non-uptake...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Palmer, C K, Thomas, M C, von Wagner, C, Raine, R
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3974074/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24619071
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2014.125
_version_ 1782479426146009088
author Palmer, C K
Thomas, M C
von Wagner, C
Raine, R
author_facet Palmer, C K
Thomas, M C
von Wagner, C
Raine, R
author_sort Palmer, C K
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Screening for bowel cancer using the guaiac faecal occult blood test offered by the NHS Bowel Cancer Screening Programme (BCSP) is taken up by 54% of the eligible population. Uptake ranges from 35% in the most to 61% in the least deprived areas. This study explores reasons for non-uptake of bowel cancer screening, and examines reasons for subsequent uptake among participants who had initially not taken part in screening. METHODS: Focus groups with a socio-economically diverse sample of participants were used to explore participants' experience of invitation to and non-uptake of bowel cancer screening. RESULTS: Participants described sampling faeces and storing faecal samples as broaching a cultural taboo, and causing shame. Completion of the test kit within the home rather than a formal health setting was considered unsettling and reduced perceived importance. Not knowing screening results was reported to be preferable to the implications of a positive screening result. Feeling well was associated with low perceived relevance of screening. Talking about bowel cancer screening with family and peers emerged as the key to subsequent participation in screening. CONCLUSIONS: Initiatives to normalise discussion about bowel cancer screening, to link the BCSP to general practice, and to simplify the test itself may lead to increased uptake across all social groups.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3974074
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39740742014-04-03 Reasons for non-uptake and subsequent participation in the NHS Bowel Cancer Screening Programme: a qualitative study Palmer, C K Thomas, M C von Wagner, C Raine, R Br J Cancer Clinical Study BACKGROUND: Screening for bowel cancer using the guaiac faecal occult blood test offered by the NHS Bowel Cancer Screening Programme (BCSP) is taken up by 54% of the eligible population. Uptake ranges from 35% in the most to 61% in the least deprived areas. This study explores reasons for non-uptake of bowel cancer screening, and examines reasons for subsequent uptake among participants who had initially not taken part in screening. METHODS: Focus groups with a socio-economically diverse sample of participants were used to explore participants' experience of invitation to and non-uptake of bowel cancer screening. RESULTS: Participants described sampling faeces and storing faecal samples as broaching a cultural taboo, and causing shame. Completion of the test kit within the home rather than a formal health setting was considered unsettling and reduced perceived importance. Not knowing screening results was reported to be preferable to the implications of a positive screening result. Feeling well was associated with low perceived relevance of screening. Talking about bowel cancer screening with family and peers emerged as the key to subsequent participation in screening. CONCLUSIONS: Initiatives to normalise discussion about bowel cancer screening, to link the BCSP to general practice, and to simplify the test itself may lead to increased uptake across all social groups. Nature Publishing Group 2014-04-01 2014-03-11 /pmc/articles/PMC3974074/ /pubmed/24619071 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2014.125 Text en Copyright © 2014 Cancer Research UK http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/ This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/
spellingShingle Clinical Study
Palmer, C K
Thomas, M C
von Wagner, C
Raine, R
Reasons for non-uptake and subsequent participation in the NHS Bowel Cancer Screening Programme: a qualitative study
title Reasons for non-uptake and subsequent participation in the NHS Bowel Cancer Screening Programme: a qualitative study
title_full Reasons for non-uptake and subsequent participation in the NHS Bowel Cancer Screening Programme: a qualitative study
title_fullStr Reasons for non-uptake and subsequent participation in the NHS Bowel Cancer Screening Programme: a qualitative study
title_full_unstemmed Reasons for non-uptake and subsequent participation in the NHS Bowel Cancer Screening Programme: a qualitative study
title_short Reasons for non-uptake and subsequent participation in the NHS Bowel Cancer Screening Programme: a qualitative study
title_sort reasons for non-uptake and subsequent participation in the nhs bowel cancer screening programme: a qualitative study
topic Clinical Study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3974074/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24619071
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2014.125
work_keys_str_mv AT palmerck reasonsfornonuptakeandsubsequentparticipationinthenhsbowelcancerscreeningprogrammeaqualitativestudy
AT thomasmc reasonsfornonuptakeandsubsequentparticipationinthenhsbowelcancerscreeningprogrammeaqualitativestudy
AT vonwagnerc reasonsfornonuptakeandsubsequentparticipationinthenhsbowelcancerscreeningprogrammeaqualitativestudy
AT rainer reasonsfornonuptakeandsubsequentparticipationinthenhsbowelcancerscreeningprogrammeaqualitativestudy