Cargando…

Tumour biomechanical response to the vascular disrupting agent ZD6126 in vivo assessed by magnetic resonance elastography

BACKGROUND: Magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) is an emerging imaging technique that affords non-invasive quantitative assessment and visualization of tissue mechanical properties in vivo. METHODS: In this study, MRE was used to quantify (kPa) the absolute value of the complex shear modulus |G*|,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Li, J, Jamin, Y, Boult, J K R, Cummings, C, Waterton, J C, Ulloa, J, Sinkus, R, Bamber, J C, Robinson, S P
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3974089/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24569471
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2014.76
_version_ 1782479429512986624
author Li, J
Jamin, Y
Boult, J K R
Cummings, C
Waterton, J C
Ulloa, J
Sinkus, R
Bamber, J C
Robinson, S P
author_facet Li, J
Jamin, Y
Boult, J K R
Cummings, C
Waterton, J C
Ulloa, J
Sinkus, R
Bamber, J C
Robinson, S P
author_sort Li, J
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) is an emerging imaging technique that affords non-invasive quantitative assessment and visualization of tissue mechanical properties in vivo. METHODS: In this study, MRE was used to quantify (kPa) the absolute value of the complex shear modulus |G*|, elasticity G(d) and viscosity G(l) of SW620 human colorectal cancer xenografts before and 24 h after treatment with either 200 mg kg(−1) of the vascular disrupting agent ZD6126 (N-acetylcolchinol-O-phosphate) or vehicle control, and the data were compared with changes in water diffusivity measured by diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging. RESULTS: A heterogeneous distribution of |G*|, G(d) and G(l) was observed pre-treatment with an intertumoral coefficient of variation of 13% for |G*|. There were no significant changes in the vehicle-treated cohort. In contrast, ZD6126 induced a significant decrease in the tumour-averaged |G*| (P<0.01), G(d) (P<0.01) and G(l) (P<0.05), and this was associated with histologically confirmed central necrosis. This reduction in tumour viscoelasticity occurred at a time when no significant change in tumour apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) was observed. CONCLUSIONS: These data demonstrate that MRE can provide early imaging biomarkers for treatment-induced tumour necrosis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3974089
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39740892015-04-01 Tumour biomechanical response to the vascular disrupting agent ZD6126 in vivo assessed by magnetic resonance elastography Li, J Jamin, Y Boult, J K R Cummings, C Waterton, J C Ulloa, J Sinkus, R Bamber, J C Robinson, S P Br J Cancer Translational Therapeutics BACKGROUND: Magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) is an emerging imaging technique that affords non-invasive quantitative assessment and visualization of tissue mechanical properties in vivo. METHODS: In this study, MRE was used to quantify (kPa) the absolute value of the complex shear modulus |G*|, elasticity G(d) and viscosity G(l) of SW620 human colorectal cancer xenografts before and 24 h after treatment with either 200 mg kg(−1) of the vascular disrupting agent ZD6126 (N-acetylcolchinol-O-phosphate) or vehicle control, and the data were compared with changes in water diffusivity measured by diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging. RESULTS: A heterogeneous distribution of |G*|, G(d) and G(l) was observed pre-treatment with an intertumoral coefficient of variation of 13% for |G*|. There were no significant changes in the vehicle-treated cohort. In contrast, ZD6126 induced a significant decrease in the tumour-averaged |G*| (P<0.01), G(d) (P<0.01) and G(l) (P<0.05), and this was associated with histologically confirmed central necrosis. This reduction in tumour viscoelasticity occurred at a time when no significant change in tumour apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) was observed. CONCLUSIONS: These data demonstrate that MRE can provide early imaging biomarkers for treatment-induced tumour necrosis. Nature Publishing Group 2014-04-01 2014-02-25 /pmc/articles/PMC3974089/ /pubmed/24569471 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2014.76 Text en Copyright © 2014 Cancer Research UK http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/ From twelve months after its original publication, this work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/
spellingShingle Translational Therapeutics
Li, J
Jamin, Y
Boult, J K R
Cummings, C
Waterton, J C
Ulloa, J
Sinkus, R
Bamber, J C
Robinson, S P
Tumour biomechanical response to the vascular disrupting agent ZD6126 in vivo assessed by magnetic resonance elastography
title Tumour biomechanical response to the vascular disrupting agent ZD6126 in vivo assessed by magnetic resonance elastography
title_full Tumour biomechanical response to the vascular disrupting agent ZD6126 in vivo assessed by magnetic resonance elastography
title_fullStr Tumour biomechanical response to the vascular disrupting agent ZD6126 in vivo assessed by magnetic resonance elastography
title_full_unstemmed Tumour biomechanical response to the vascular disrupting agent ZD6126 in vivo assessed by magnetic resonance elastography
title_short Tumour biomechanical response to the vascular disrupting agent ZD6126 in vivo assessed by magnetic resonance elastography
title_sort tumour biomechanical response to the vascular disrupting agent zd6126 in vivo assessed by magnetic resonance elastography
topic Translational Therapeutics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3974089/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24569471
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2014.76
work_keys_str_mv AT lij tumourbiomechanicalresponsetothevasculardisruptingagentzd6126invivoassessedbymagneticresonanceelastography
AT jaminy tumourbiomechanicalresponsetothevasculardisruptingagentzd6126invivoassessedbymagneticresonanceelastography
AT boultjkr tumourbiomechanicalresponsetothevasculardisruptingagentzd6126invivoassessedbymagneticresonanceelastography
AT cummingsc tumourbiomechanicalresponsetothevasculardisruptingagentzd6126invivoassessedbymagneticresonanceelastography
AT watertonjc tumourbiomechanicalresponsetothevasculardisruptingagentzd6126invivoassessedbymagneticresonanceelastography
AT ulloaj tumourbiomechanicalresponsetothevasculardisruptingagentzd6126invivoassessedbymagneticresonanceelastography
AT sinkusr tumourbiomechanicalresponsetothevasculardisruptingagentzd6126invivoassessedbymagneticresonanceelastography
AT bamberjc tumourbiomechanicalresponsetothevasculardisruptingagentzd6126invivoassessedbymagneticresonanceelastography
AT robinsonsp tumourbiomechanicalresponsetothevasculardisruptingagentzd6126invivoassessedbymagneticresonanceelastography