Cargando…

Exploring recruitment barriers and facilitators in early cancer detection trials: the use of pre-trial focus groups

BACKGROUND: Recruiting to randomized controlled trials is fraught with challenges; with less than one third recruiting to their original target. In preparation for a trial evaluating the effectiveness of a blood test to screen for lung cancer (the ECLS trial), we conducted a qualitative study to exp...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: das Nair, Roshan, Orr, Kate Skellington, Vedhara, Kavita, Kendrick, Denise
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3974214/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24678918
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-15-98
_version_ 1782479449191612416
author das Nair, Roshan
Orr, Kate Skellington
Vedhara, Kavita
Kendrick, Denise
author_facet das Nair, Roshan
Orr, Kate Skellington
Vedhara, Kavita
Kendrick, Denise
author_sort das Nair, Roshan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Recruiting to randomized controlled trials is fraught with challenges; with less than one third recruiting to their original target. In preparation for a trial evaluating the effectiveness of a blood test to screen for lung cancer (the ECLS trial), we conducted a qualitative study to explore the potential barriers and facilitators that would impact recruitment. METHODS: Thirty two people recruited from community settings took part in four focus groups in Glasgow and Dundee (UK). Thematic analysis was used to code the data and develop themes. RESULTS: Three sub-themes were developed under the larger theme of recruitment strategies. The first of these themes, recruitment options, considered that participants largely felt that the invitation to participate letter should come from GPs, with postal reminders and face-to-face reminders during primary care contacts. The second theme dealt with understanding randomization and issues related to the control group (where bloods were taken but not tested). Some participants struggled with the concept or need for randomization, or for the need for a control group. Some reported that they would not consider taking part if allocated to the control group, but others were motivated to take part even if allocated to the control group by altruism. The final theme considered perceived barriers to participation and included practical barriers (such as flexible appointments and reimbursement of travel expenses) and psychosocial barriers (such as feeling stigmatized because of their smoking status and worries about being coerced into stopping smoking). CONCLUSIONS: Focus groups provided useful information which resulted in numerous changes to proposed trial documentation and processes. This was in order to address participants information needs, improve comprehension of the trial documentation, enhance facilitators and remove barriers to participation. The modifications made in light of these findings may enhance trial recruitment and future trials may wish to consider use of pretrial focus groups.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3974214
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39742142014-04-04 Exploring recruitment barriers and facilitators in early cancer detection trials: the use of pre-trial focus groups das Nair, Roshan Orr, Kate Skellington Vedhara, Kavita Kendrick, Denise Trials Research BACKGROUND: Recruiting to randomized controlled trials is fraught with challenges; with less than one third recruiting to their original target. In preparation for a trial evaluating the effectiveness of a blood test to screen for lung cancer (the ECLS trial), we conducted a qualitative study to explore the potential barriers and facilitators that would impact recruitment. METHODS: Thirty two people recruited from community settings took part in four focus groups in Glasgow and Dundee (UK). Thematic analysis was used to code the data and develop themes. RESULTS: Three sub-themes were developed under the larger theme of recruitment strategies. The first of these themes, recruitment options, considered that participants largely felt that the invitation to participate letter should come from GPs, with postal reminders and face-to-face reminders during primary care contacts. The second theme dealt with understanding randomization and issues related to the control group (where bloods were taken but not tested). Some participants struggled with the concept or need for randomization, or for the need for a control group. Some reported that they would not consider taking part if allocated to the control group, but others were motivated to take part even if allocated to the control group by altruism. The final theme considered perceived barriers to participation and included practical barriers (such as flexible appointments and reimbursement of travel expenses) and psychosocial barriers (such as feeling stigmatized because of their smoking status and worries about being coerced into stopping smoking). CONCLUSIONS: Focus groups provided useful information which resulted in numerous changes to proposed trial documentation and processes. This was in order to address participants information needs, improve comprehension of the trial documentation, enhance facilitators and remove barriers to participation. The modifications made in light of these findings may enhance trial recruitment and future trials may wish to consider use of pretrial focus groups. BioMed Central 2014-03-29 /pmc/articles/PMC3974214/ /pubmed/24678918 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-15-98 Text en Copyright © 2014 das Nair et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
das Nair, Roshan
Orr, Kate Skellington
Vedhara, Kavita
Kendrick, Denise
Exploring recruitment barriers and facilitators in early cancer detection trials: the use of pre-trial focus groups
title Exploring recruitment barriers and facilitators in early cancer detection trials: the use of pre-trial focus groups
title_full Exploring recruitment barriers and facilitators in early cancer detection trials: the use of pre-trial focus groups
title_fullStr Exploring recruitment barriers and facilitators in early cancer detection trials: the use of pre-trial focus groups
title_full_unstemmed Exploring recruitment barriers and facilitators in early cancer detection trials: the use of pre-trial focus groups
title_short Exploring recruitment barriers and facilitators in early cancer detection trials: the use of pre-trial focus groups
title_sort exploring recruitment barriers and facilitators in early cancer detection trials: the use of pre-trial focus groups
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3974214/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24678918
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-15-98
work_keys_str_mv AT dasnairroshan exploringrecruitmentbarriersandfacilitatorsinearlycancerdetectiontrialstheuseofpretrialfocusgroups
AT orrkateskellington exploringrecruitmentbarriersandfacilitatorsinearlycancerdetectiontrialstheuseofpretrialfocusgroups
AT vedharakavita exploringrecruitmentbarriersandfacilitatorsinearlycancerdetectiontrialstheuseofpretrialfocusgroups
AT kendrickdenise exploringrecruitmentbarriersandfacilitatorsinearlycancerdetectiontrialstheuseofpretrialfocusgroups