Cargando…
A new impetus for guideline development and implementation: construction and evaluation of a toolbox
BACKGROUND: In the last decade, guideline organizations faced a number of problems, including a lack of standardization in guideline development methods and suboptimal guideline implementation. To contribute to the solution of these problems, we produced a toolbox for guideline development, implemen...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3974222/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24641971 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-9-34 |
_version_ | 1782479450980483072 |
---|---|
author | Hilbink, Mirrian AHW Ouwens, Marielle MTJ Burgers, Jako S Kool, Rudolf B |
author_facet | Hilbink, Mirrian AHW Ouwens, Marielle MTJ Burgers, Jako S Kool, Rudolf B |
author_sort | Hilbink, Mirrian AHW |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: In the last decade, guideline organizations faced a number of problems, including a lack of standardization in guideline development methods and suboptimal guideline implementation. To contribute to the solution of these problems, we produced a toolbox for guideline development, implementation, revision, and evaluation. METHODS: All relevant guideline organizations in the Netherlands were approached to prioritize the topics. We sent out a questionnaire and discussed the results at an invitational conference. Based on consensus, twelve topics were selected for the development of new tools. Subsequently, working groups were composed for the development of the tools. After development of the tools, their draft versions were pilot tested in 40 guideline projects. Based on the results of the pilot tests, the tools were refined and their final versions were presented. RESULTS: The vast majority of organizations involved in pilot testing of the tools reported satisfaction with using the tools. Guideline experts involved in pilot testing of the tools proposed a variety of suggestions for the implementation of the tools. The tools are available in Dutch and in English at a web-based platform on guideline development and implementation (http://www.ha-ring.nl). CONCLUSIONS: A collaborative approach was used for the development and evaluation of a toolbox for development, implementation, revision, and evaluation of guidelines. This approach yielded a potentially powerful toolbox for improving the quality and implementation of Dutch clinical guidelines. Collaboration between guideline organizations within this project led to stronger linkages, which is useful for enhancing coordination of guideline development and implementation and preventing duplication of efforts. Use of the toolbox could improve quality standards in the Netherlands, and might facilitate the development of high-quality guidelines in other countries as well. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3974222 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-39742222014-04-04 A new impetus for guideline development and implementation: construction and evaluation of a toolbox Hilbink, Mirrian AHW Ouwens, Marielle MTJ Burgers, Jako S Kool, Rudolf B Implement Sci Research BACKGROUND: In the last decade, guideline organizations faced a number of problems, including a lack of standardization in guideline development methods and suboptimal guideline implementation. To contribute to the solution of these problems, we produced a toolbox for guideline development, implementation, revision, and evaluation. METHODS: All relevant guideline organizations in the Netherlands were approached to prioritize the topics. We sent out a questionnaire and discussed the results at an invitational conference. Based on consensus, twelve topics were selected for the development of new tools. Subsequently, working groups were composed for the development of the tools. After development of the tools, their draft versions were pilot tested in 40 guideline projects. Based on the results of the pilot tests, the tools were refined and their final versions were presented. RESULTS: The vast majority of organizations involved in pilot testing of the tools reported satisfaction with using the tools. Guideline experts involved in pilot testing of the tools proposed a variety of suggestions for the implementation of the tools. The tools are available in Dutch and in English at a web-based platform on guideline development and implementation (http://www.ha-ring.nl). CONCLUSIONS: A collaborative approach was used for the development and evaluation of a toolbox for development, implementation, revision, and evaluation of guidelines. This approach yielded a potentially powerful toolbox for improving the quality and implementation of Dutch clinical guidelines. Collaboration between guideline organizations within this project led to stronger linkages, which is useful for enhancing coordination of guideline development and implementation and preventing duplication of efforts. Use of the toolbox could improve quality standards in the Netherlands, and might facilitate the development of high-quality guidelines in other countries as well. BioMed Central 2014-03-19 /pmc/articles/PMC3974222/ /pubmed/24641971 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-9-34 Text en Copyright © 2014 Hilbink et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Hilbink, Mirrian AHW Ouwens, Marielle MTJ Burgers, Jako S Kool, Rudolf B A new impetus for guideline development and implementation: construction and evaluation of a toolbox |
title | A new impetus for guideline development and implementation: construction and evaluation of a toolbox |
title_full | A new impetus for guideline development and implementation: construction and evaluation of a toolbox |
title_fullStr | A new impetus for guideline development and implementation: construction and evaluation of a toolbox |
title_full_unstemmed | A new impetus for guideline development and implementation: construction and evaluation of a toolbox |
title_short | A new impetus for guideline development and implementation: construction and evaluation of a toolbox |
title_sort | new impetus for guideline development and implementation: construction and evaluation of a toolbox |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3974222/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24641971 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-9-34 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hilbinkmirrianahw anewimpetusforguidelinedevelopmentandimplementationconstructionandevaluationofatoolbox AT ouwensmariellemtj anewimpetusforguidelinedevelopmentandimplementationconstructionandevaluationofatoolbox AT burgersjakos anewimpetusforguidelinedevelopmentandimplementationconstructionandevaluationofatoolbox AT koolrudolfb anewimpetusforguidelinedevelopmentandimplementationconstructionandevaluationofatoolbox AT hilbinkmirrianahw newimpetusforguidelinedevelopmentandimplementationconstructionandevaluationofatoolbox AT ouwensmariellemtj newimpetusforguidelinedevelopmentandimplementationconstructionandevaluationofatoolbox AT burgersjakos newimpetusforguidelinedevelopmentandimplementationconstructionandevaluationofatoolbox AT koolrudolfb newimpetusforguidelinedevelopmentandimplementationconstructionandevaluationofatoolbox |