Cargando…

CARd-3D: Carbon Distribution in 3D Structure Program for Globular Proteins

Spatial arrangement of carbon in protein structure is analyzed here. Particularly, the carbon fractions around individual atoms are compared. It is hoped that it follows the principle of 31.45% carbon around individual atoms. The results reveal that globular protein's atoms follow this principl...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ekambaram, Rajasekaran, Kannaiyan, Akila, Marimuthu, Vijayasarathy, Swaminathan, Vinobha Chinnaiah, Renganathan, Senthil, Perumal, Ananda Gopu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Biomedical Informatics 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3974240/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24748753
http://dx.doi.org/10.6026/97320630010138
_version_ 1782479455066783744
author Ekambaram, Rajasekaran
Kannaiyan, Akila
Marimuthu, Vijayasarathy
Swaminathan, Vinobha Chinnaiah
Renganathan, Senthil
Perumal, Ananda Gopu
author_facet Ekambaram, Rajasekaran
Kannaiyan, Akila
Marimuthu, Vijayasarathy
Swaminathan, Vinobha Chinnaiah
Renganathan, Senthil
Perumal, Ananda Gopu
author_sort Ekambaram, Rajasekaran
collection PubMed
description Spatial arrangement of carbon in protein structure is analyzed here. Particularly, the carbon fractions around individual atoms are compared. It is hoped that it follows the principle of 31.45% carbon around individual atoms. The results reveal that globular protein's atoms follow this principle. A comparative study on monomer versus dimer reveal that carbon is better distributed in dimeric form than in its monomeric form. Similar study on solid versus liquid structures reveals that the liquid (NMR) structure has better carbon distribution over the corresponding solid (X-Ray) structure. The carbon fraction distributions in fiber and toxin protein are compared. Fiber proteins follow the principle of carbon fraction distribution. At the same time it has another broad spectrum of carbon distribution than in globular proteins. The toxin protein follows an abnormal carbon fraction distribution. The carbon fraction distribution plays an important role in deciding the structure and shape of proteins. It is hoped to help in understanding the protein folding and function.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3974240
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Biomedical Informatics
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39742402014-04-18 CARd-3D: Carbon Distribution in 3D Structure Program for Globular Proteins Ekambaram, Rajasekaran Kannaiyan, Akila Marimuthu, Vijayasarathy Swaminathan, Vinobha Chinnaiah Renganathan, Senthil Perumal, Ananda Gopu Bioinformation Hypothesis Spatial arrangement of carbon in protein structure is analyzed here. Particularly, the carbon fractions around individual atoms are compared. It is hoped that it follows the principle of 31.45% carbon around individual atoms. The results reveal that globular protein's atoms follow this principle. A comparative study on monomer versus dimer reveal that carbon is better distributed in dimeric form than in its monomeric form. Similar study on solid versus liquid structures reveals that the liquid (NMR) structure has better carbon distribution over the corresponding solid (X-Ray) structure. The carbon fraction distributions in fiber and toxin protein are compared. Fiber proteins follow the principle of carbon fraction distribution. At the same time it has another broad spectrum of carbon distribution than in globular proteins. The toxin protein follows an abnormal carbon fraction distribution. The carbon fraction distribution plays an important role in deciding the structure and shape of proteins. It is hoped to help in understanding the protein folding and function. Biomedical Informatics 2014-03-19 /pmc/articles/PMC3974240/ /pubmed/24748753 http://dx.doi.org/10.6026/97320630010138 Text en © 2014 Biomedical Informatics This is an open-access article, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, for non-commercial purposes, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Hypothesis
Ekambaram, Rajasekaran
Kannaiyan, Akila
Marimuthu, Vijayasarathy
Swaminathan, Vinobha Chinnaiah
Renganathan, Senthil
Perumal, Ananda Gopu
CARd-3D: Carbon Distribution in 3D Structure Program for Globular Proteins
title CARd-3D: Carbon Distribution in 3D Structure Program for Globular Proteins
title_full CARd-3D: Carbon Distribution in 3D Structure Program for Globular Proteins
title_fullStr CARd-3D: Carbon Distribution in 3D Structure Program for Globular Proteins
title_full_unstemmed CARd-3D: Carbon Distribution in 3D Structure Program for Globular Proteins
title_short CARd-3D: Carbon Distribution in 3D Structure Program for Globular Proteins
title_sort card-3d: carbon distribution in 3d structure program for globular proteins
topic Hypothesis
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3974240/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24748753
http://dx.doi.org/10.6026/97320630010138
work_keys_str_mv AT ekambaramrajasekaran card3dcarbondistributionin3dstructureprogramforglobularproteins
AT kannaiyanakila card3dcarbondistributionin3dstructureprogramforglobularproteins
AT marimuthuvijayasarathy card3dcarbondistributionin3dstructureprogramforglobularproteins
AT swaminathanvinobhachinnaiah card3dcarbondistributionin3dstructureprogramforglobularproteins
AT renganathansenthil card3dcarbondistributionin3dstructureprogramforglobularproteins
AT perumalanandagopu card3dcarbondistributionin3dstructureprogramforglobularproteins