Cargando…
Is there a place for ESWL in the treatment of complicated proximal ureteral stones?
Autor principal: | Bres–Niewada, Ewa |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Polish Urological Association
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3974487/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24707371 http://dx.doi.org/10.5173/ceju.2013.03.art15 |
Ejemplares similares
-
URS versus ESWL: another contribution to the never–ending debate
por: Hrbáček, Jan
Publicado: (2013) -
Large impacted distal ureteric stones are treated better by URS: putting priorities
por: Malkhasyan, Vigen, et al.
Publicado: (2013) -
Shock-wave lithotripsy or ureterorenoscopy for renal stones?
por: Ferraro, Pietro Manuel, et al.
Publicado: (2018) -
Selected examples of complications after minimally invasive treatment for urolithiasis
por: Różański, Waldemar, et al.
Publicado: (2012) -
Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy versus flexible ureterorenoscopy in the treatment of untreated renal calculi
por: Fankhauser, Christian D, et al.
Publicado: (2018)