Cargando…

The Weber Effect and the United States Food and Drug Administration’s Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS): Analysis of Sixty-Two Drugs Approved from 2006 to 2010

BACKGROUND: The United States Food and Drug Administration’s (FDA) Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) consists of adverse event (AE) reports linked to approved drugs. The database is widely used to support post-marketing safety surveillance programs. Sometimes cited as a limitation to the useful...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hoffman, Keith B., Dimbil, Mo, Erdman, Colin B., Tatonetti, Nicholas P., Overstreet, Brian M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3975089/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24643967
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40264-014-0150-2
_version_ 1782310081871740928
author Hoffman, Keith B.
Dimbil, Mo
Erdman, Colin B.
Tatonetti, Nicholas P.
Overstreet, Brian M.
author_facet Hoffman, Keith B.
Dimbil, Mo
Erdman, Colin B.
Tatonetti, Nicholas P.
Overstreet, Brian M.
author_sort Hoffman, Keith B.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The United States Food and Drug Administration’s (FDA) Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) consists of adverse event (AE) reports linked to approved drugs. The database is widely used to support post-marketing safety surveillance programs. Sometimes cited as a limitation to the usefulness of FAERS, however, is the ‘Weber effect,’ which is often summarized by stating that AE reporting peaks at the end of the second year after a regulatory authority approves a drug. Weber described this effect in 1984 based upon a single class of medications prescribed in the United Kingdom. Since that time, the FDA has made a concerted effort to improve both reporting and the database itself. Both volume and quality of AE reporting has dramatically improved since Weber’s report, with an estimated 800,000 yearly reports now being logged into FAERS. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine if current FAERS reporting follows the trend described by Weber. METHODS: Sixty-two drugs approved by the FDA between 2006 and 2010 were included in this analysis. Publicly available FAERS data were used to assess the ‘primary suspect’ AE reporting pattern for up to a 4-year period following each drug’s approval date. RESULTS: A total of 334,984 AE reports were logged into FAERS for the 62 drugs analyzed here. While a few of the drugs demonstrated what could be considered ‘Weber effect’ curves, a majority of the drugs showed little evidence for the effect. In fact, the general AE reporting pattern observed in this study appears to consist simply of increasing case counts over the first three quarters after approval followed by relatively constant counts thereafter. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that most of the modern adverse event reporting into FAERS does not follow the pattern described by Weber. Factors that may have contributed to this finding include large increases in the volume of AE reports since the Weber effect was described, as well as a concerted effort by the FDA to increase awareness regarding the utility of post-marketing AE reporting. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s40264-014-0150-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3975089
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39750892014-04-07 The Weber Effect and the United States Food and Drug Administration’s Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS): Analysis of Sixty-Two Drugs Approved from 2006 to 2010 Hoffman, Keith B. Dimbil, Mo Erdman, Colin B. Tatonetti, Nicholas P. Overstreet, Brian M. Drug Saf Original Research Article BACKGROUND: The United States Food and Drug Administration’s (FDA) Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) consists of adverse event (AE) reports linked to approved drugs. The database is widely used to support post-marketing safety surveillance programs. Sometimes cited as a limitation to the usefulness of FAERS, however, is the ‘Weber effect,’ which is often summarized by stating that AE reporting peaks at the end of the second year after a regulatory authority approves a drug. Weber described this effect in 1984 based upon a single class of medications prescribed in the United Kingdom. Since that time, the FDA has made a concerted effort to improve both reporting and the database itself. Both volume and quality of AE reporting has dramatically improved since Weber’s report, with an estimated 800,000 yearly reports now being logged into FAERS. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine if current FAERS reporting follows the trend described by Weber. METHODS: Sixty-two drugs approved by the FDA between 2006 and 2010 were included in this analysis. Publicly available FAERS data were used to assess the ‘primary suspect’ AE reporting pattern for up to a 4-year period following each drug’s approval date. RESULTS: A total of 334,984 AE reports were logged into FAERS for the 62 drugs analyzed here. While a few of the drugs demonstrated what could be considered ‘Weber effect’ curves, a majority of the drugs showed little evidence for the effect. In fact, the general AE reporting pattern observed in this study appears to consist simply of increasing case counts over the first three quarters after approval followed by relatively constant counts thereafter. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that most of the modern adverse event reporting into FAERS does not follow the pattern described by Weber. Factors that may have contributed to this finding include large increases in the volume of AE reports since the Weber effect was described, as well as a concerted effort by the FDA to increase awareness regarding the utility of post-marketing AE reporting. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s40264-014-0150-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer International Publishing 2014-03-19 2014 /pmc/articles/PMC3975089/ /pubmed/24643967 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40264-014-0150-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2014 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited.
spellingShingle Original Research Article
Hoffman, Keith B.
Dimbil, Mo
Erdman, Colin B.
Tatonetti, Nicholas P.
Overstreet, Brian M.
The Weber Effect and the United States Food and Drug Administration’s Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS): Analysis of Sixty-Two Drugs Approved from 2006 to 2010
title The Weber Effect and the United States Food and Drug Administration’s Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS): Analysis of Sixty-Two Drugs Approved from 2006 to 2010
title_full The Weber Effect and the United States Food and Drug Administration’s Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS): Analysis of Sixty-Two Drugs Approved from 2006 to 2010
title_fullStr The Weber Effect and the United States Food and Drug Administration’s Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS): Analysis of Sixty-Two Drugs Approved from 2006 to 2010
title_full_unstemmed The Weber Effect and the United States Food and Drug Administration’s Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS): Analysis of Sixty-Two Drugs Approved from 2006 to 2010
title_short The Weber Effect and the United States Food and Drug Administration’s Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS): Analysis of Sixty-Two Drugs Approved from 2006 to 2010
title_sort weber effect and the united states food and drug administration’s adverse event reporting system (faers): analysis of sixty-two drugs approved from 2006 to 2010
topic Original Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3975089/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24643967
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40264-014-0150-2
work_keys_str_mv AT hoffmankeithb thewebereffectandtheunitedstatesfoodanddrugadministrationsadverseeventreportingsystemfaersanalysisofsixtytwodrugsapprovedfrom2006to2010
AT dimbilmo thewebereffectandtheunitedstatesfoodanddrugadministrationsadverseeventreportingsystemfaersanalysisofsixtytwodrugsapprovedfrom2006to2010
AT erdmancolinb thewebereffectandtheunitedstatesfoodanddrugadministrationsadverseeventreportingsystemfaersanalysisofsixtytwodrugsapprovedfrom2006to2010
AT tatonettinicholasp thewebereffectandtheunitedstatesfoodanddrugadministrationsadverseeventreportingsystemfaersanalysisofsixtytwodrugsapprovedfrom2006to2010
AT overstreetbrianm thewebereffectandtheunitedstatesfoodanddrugadministrationsadverseeventreportingsystemfaersanalysisofsixtytwodrugsapprovedfrom2006to2010
AT hoffmankeithb webereffectandtheunitedstatesfoodanddrugadministrationsadverseeventreportingsystemfaersanalysisofsixtytwodrugsapprovedfrom2006to2010
AT dimbilmo webereffectandtheunitedstatesfoodanddrugadministrationsadverseeventreportingsystemfaersanalysisofsixtytwodrugsapprovedfrom2006to2010
AT erdmancolinb webereffectandtheunitedstatesfoodanddrugadministrationsadverseeventreportingsystemfaersanalysisofsixtytwodrugsapprovedfrom2006to2010
AT tatonettinicholasp webereffectandtheunitedstatesfoodanddrugadministrationsadverseeventreportingsystemfaersanalysisofsixtytwodrugsapprovedfrom2006to2010
AT overstreetbrianm webereffectandtheunitedstatesfoodanddrugadministrationsadverseeventreportingsystemfaersanalysisofsixtytwodrugsapprovedfrom2006to2010