Cargando…

Reliability and validity of the Norwegian version of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaire in patients with shoulder impingement syndrome

BACKGROUND: Patient-rated outcome measures (PROMs) are an important part of clinical decision-making in rehabilitation of patients with shoulder pain. The Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) questionnaire was designed to measure physical disability and symptoms in patients with musculoskel...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Haldorsen, Benjamin, Svege, Ida, Roe, Yngve, Bergland, Astrid
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3975243/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24618360
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-15-78
_version_ 1782310112549928960
author Haldorsen, Benjamin
Svege, Ida
Roe, Yngve
Bergland, Astrid
author_facet Haldorsen, Benjamin
Svege, Ida
Roe, Yngve
Bergland, Astrid
author_sort Haldorsen, Benjamin
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Patient-rated outcome measures (PROMs) are an important part of clinical decision-making in rehabilitation of patients with shoulder pain. The Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) questionnaire was designed to measure physical disability and symptoms in patients with musculoskeletal disorders of the upper extremity and is one the most commonly used outcome measures for patients with shoulder pain. The purpose of this study was to investigate the reliability and validity of the Norwegian version of the DASH in patients with shoulder impingement syndrome. METHODS: Sixty-three patients diagnosed with shoulder impingement syndrome at an orthopaedic outpatient clinic were included in the study. Internal consistency of the DASH was evaluated by the Cronbach’s alpha and item-to-total correlations. Test-retest reliability was analyzed by the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and limits of agreement (LoA) according to the Bland Altman method. Standard error of measurement (SEM) and minimally detectable change (MDC) were calculated for the total DASH score. Construct validity was evaluated by testing six a priori hypotheses for the Pearson’s correlation coefficient between the DASH and the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI), the 36-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) and a Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS). RESULTS: Reliability: Cronbach’s alpha of the DASH was 0.93 and item-to-total correlations ranged from 0.36 to 0.81. ICC was 0.89. The 95 percent LoA was calculated to be between -11.9 and 14.1. SEM was 4.7 and MDC 13.1. Construct validity: Eighty-three percent of the a priori hypotheses of correlation were confirmed. The DASH showed a high positive correlation of 0.75 with the SPADI, a negative moderate correlation of -0.48 to -0.62 with physical functioning, bodily pain and physical component summary of the SF-36 and a moderate positive correlation of 0.58 with the NPRS. DASH correlated higher with the physical component summary than with the mental component summary of the SF-36. CONCLUSIONS: The Norwegian version of the DASH is a reliable and valid outcome measure for patients with shoulder impingement syndrome.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3975243
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39752432014-04-17 Reliability and validity of the Norwegian version of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaire in patients with shoulder impingement syndrome Haldorsen, Benjamin Svege, Ida Roe, Yngve Bergland, Astrid BMC Musculoskelet Disord Research Article BACKGROUND: Patient-rated outcome measures (PROMs) are an important part of clinical decision-making in rehabilitation of patients with shoulder pain. The Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) questionnaire was designed to measure physical disability and symptoms in patients with musculoskeletal disorders of the upper extremity and is one the most commonly used outcome measures for patients with shoulder pain. The purpose of this study was to investigate the reliability and validity of the Norwegian version of the DASH in patients with shoulder impingement syndrome. METHODS: Sixty-three patients diagnosed with shoulder impingement syndrome at an orthopaedic outpatient clinic were included in the study. Internal consistency of the DASH was evaluated by the Cronbach’s alpha and item-to-total correlations. Test-retest reliability was analyzed by the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and limits of agreement (LoA) according to the Bland Altman method. Standard error of measurement (SEM) and minimally detectable change (MDC) were calculated for the total DASH score. Construct validity was evaluated by testing six a priori hypotheses for the Pearson’s correlation coefficient between the DASH and the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI), the 36-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) and a Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS). RESULTS: Reliability: Cronbach’s alpha of the DASH was 0.93 and item-to-total correlations ranged from 0.36 to 0.81. ICC was 0.89. The 95 percent LoA was calculated to be between -11.9 and 14.1. SEM was 4.7 and MDC 13.1. Construct validity: Eighty-three percent of the a priori hypotheses of correlation were confirmed. The DASH showed a high positive correlation of 0.75 with the SPADI, a negative moderate correlation of -0.48 to -0.62 with physical functioning, bodily pain and physical component summary of the SF-36 and a moderate positive correlation of 0.58 with the NPRS. DASH correlated higher with the physical component summary than with the mental component summary of the SF-36. CONCLUSIONS: The Norwegian version of the DASH is a reliable and valid outcome measure for patients with shoulder impingement syndrome. BioMed Central 2014-03-12 /pmc/articles/PMC3975243/ /pubmed/24618360 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-15-78 Text en Copyright © 2014 Haldorsen et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Haldorsen, Benjamin
Svege, Ida
Roe, Yngve
Bergland, Astrid
Reliability and validity of the Norwegian version of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaire in patients with shoulder impingement syndrome
title Reliability and validity of the Norwegian version of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaire in patients with shoulder impingement syndrome
title_full Reliability and validity of the Norwegian version of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaire in patients with shoulder impingement syndrome
title_fullStr Reliability and validity of the Norwegian version of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaire in patients with shoulder impingement syndrome
title_full_unstemmed Reliability and validity of the Norwegian version of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaire in patients with shoulder impingement syndrome
title_short Reliability and validity of the Norwegian version of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaire in patients with shoulder impingement syndrome
title_sort reliability and validity of the norwegian version of the disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand questionnaire in patients with shoulder impingement syndrome
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3975243/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24618360
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-15-78
work_keys_str_mv AT haldorsenbenjamin reliabilityandvalidityofthenorwegianversionofthedisabilitiesofthearmshoulderandhandquestionnaireinpatientswithshoulderimpingementsyndrome
AT svegeida reliabilityandvalidityofthenorwegianversionofthedisabilitiesofthearmshoulderandhandquestionnaireinpatientswithshoulderimpingementsyndrome
AT roeyngve reliabilityandvalidityofthenorwegianversionofthedisabilitiesofthearmshoulderandhandquestionnaireinpatientswithshoulderimpingementsyndrome
AT berglandastrid reliabilityandvalidityofthenorwegianversionofthedisabilitiesofthearmshoulderandhandquestionnaireinpatientswithshoulderimpingementsyndrome