Cargando…
A randomized controlled trial of the effectiveness of a pre-recruitment primer letter to increase participation in a study of colorectal screening and surveillance
BACKGROUND: Recruiting cancer patients is a barrier often encountered in research trials. However, very few randomized trials explore strategies to improve participation rates. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of a pre-recruitment primer letter to recruit persons diagnosed...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3975453/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24690533 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-14-44 |
_version_ | 1782310157950124032 |
---|---|
author | Paul, Christine Courtney, Ryan Sanson-Fisher, Rob Carey, Mariko Hill, David Simmons, Jody Rose, Shiho |
author_facet | Paul, Christine Courtney, Ryan Sanson-Fisher, Rob Carey, Mariko Hill, David Simmons, Jody Rose, Shiho |
author_sort | Paul, Christine |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Recruiting cancer patients is a barrier often encountered in research trials. However, very few randomized trials explore strategies to improve participation rates. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of a pre-recruitment primer letter to recruit persons diagnosed with colorectal cancer for a research trial. METHODS: Potentially eligible participants were identified by the Victorian Cancer Registry. A total of 1,062 participants were randomized to receive either a mailed explanatory primer letter designed to encourage research participation, or no primer letter. Two weeks after the intervention, the Victorian Cancer Registry sought permission from patients to release their contact details to researchers. Those who agreed were contacted and invited to the study. RESULTS: Pre-recruitment encouragement was not effective at increasing recruitment, with no significant differences demonstrated between experimental groups. Overall, 40% (n = 425) consented to participate, 25% (n = 243) refused and 35% (n = 394) did not respond. CONCLUSIONS: While this study demonstrated disappointing outcomes, pre-recruitment letters should not be ruled out as an approach altogether. Rather, future research should explore whether other factors to increase motivation, such as intensity and timing, are feasible and acceptable for contacting cancer patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry, ACTRN12609000628246 |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3975453 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-39754532014-04-05 A randomized controlled trial of the effectiveness of a pre-recruitment primer letter to increase participation in a study of colorectal screening and surveillance Paul, Christine Courtney, Ryan Sanson-Fisher, Rob Carey, Mariko Hill, David Simmons, Jody Rose, Shiho BMC Med Res Methodol Research Article BACKGROUND: Recruiting cancer patients is a barrier often encountered in research trials. However, very few randomized trials explore strategies to improve participation rates. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of a pre-recruitment primer letter to recruit persons diagnosed with colorectal cancer for a research trial. METHODS: Potentially eligible participants were identified by the Victorian Cancer Registry. A total of 1,062 participants were randomized to receive either a mailed explanatory primer letter designed to encourage research participation, or no primer letter. Two weeks after the intervention, the Victorian Cancer Registry sought permission from patients to release their contact details to researchers. Those who agreed were contacted and invited to the study. RESULTS: Pre-recruitment encouragement was not effective at increasing recruitment, with no significant differences demonstrated between experimental groups. Overall, 40% (n = 425) consented to participate, 25% (n = 243) refused and 35% (n = 394) did not respond. CONCLUSIONS: While this study demonstrated disappointing outcomes, pre-recruitment letters should not be ruled out as an approach altogether. Rather, future research should explore whether other factors to increase motivation, such as intensity and timing, are feasible and acceptable for contacting cancer patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry, ACTRN12609000628246 BioMed Central 2014-04-01 /pmc/articles/PMC3975453/ /pubmed/24690533 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-14-44 Text en Copyright © 2014 Paul et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Paul, Christine Courtney, Ryan Sanson-Fisher, Rob Carey, Mariko Hill, David Simmons, Jody Rose, Shiho A randomized controlled trial of the effectiveness of a pre-recruitment primer letter to increase participation in a study of colorectal screening and surveillance |
title | A randomized controlled trial of the effectiveness of a pre-recruitment primer letter to increase participation in a study of colorectal screening and surveillance |
title_full | A randomized controlled trial of the effectiveness of a pre-recruitment primer letter to increase participation in a study of colorectal screening and surveillance |
title_fullStr | A randomized controlled trial of the effectiveness of a pre-recruitment primer letter to increase participation in a study of colorectal screening and surveillance |
title_full_unstemmed | A randomized controlled trial of the effectiveness of a pre-recruitment primer letter to increase participation in a study of colorectal screening and surveillance |
title_short | A randomized controlled trial of the effectiveness of a pre-recruitment primer letter to increase participation in a study of colorectal screening and surveillance |
title_sort | randomized controlled trial of the effectiveness of a pre-recruitment primer letter to increase participation in a study of colorectal screening and surveillance |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3975453/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24690533 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-14-44 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT paulchristine arandomizedcontrolledtrialoftheeffectivenessofaprerecruitmentprimerlettertoincreaseparticipationinastudyofcolorectalscreeningandsurveillance AT courtneyryan arandomizedcontrolledtrialoftheeffectivenessofaprerecruitmentprimerlettertoincreaseparticipationinastudyofcolorectalscreeningandsurveillance AT sansonfisherrob arandomizedcontrolledtrialoftheeffectivenessofaprerecruitmentprimerlettertoincreaseparticipationinastudyofcolorectalscreeningandsurveillance AT careymariko arandomizedcontrolledtrialoftheeffectivenessofaprerecruitmentprimerlettertoincreaseparticipationinastudyofcolorectalscreeningandsurveillance AT hilldavid arandomizedcontrolledtrialoftheeffectivenessofaprerecruitmentprimerlettertoincreaseparticipationinastudyofcolorectalscreeningandsurveillance AT simmonsjody arandomizedcontrolledtrialoftheeffectivenessofaprerecruitmentprimerlettertoincreaseparticipationinastudyofcolorectalscreeningandsurveillance AT roseshiho arandomizedcontrolledtrialoftheeffectivenessofaprerecruitmentprimerlettertoincreaseparticipationinastudyofcolorectalscreeningandsurveillance AT paulchristine randomizedcontrolledtrialoftheeffectivenessofaprerecruitmentprimerlettertoincreaseparticipationinastudyofcolorectalscreeningandsurveillance AT courtneyryan randomizedcontrolledtrialoftheeffectivenessofaprerecruitmentprimerlettertoincreaseparticipationinastudyofcolorectalscreeningandsurveillance AT sansonfisherrob randomizedcontrolledtrialoftheeffectivenessofaprerecruitmentprimerlettertoincreaseparticipationinastudyofcolorectalscreeningandsurveillance AT careymariko randomizedcontrolledtrialoftheeffectivenessofaprerecruitmentprimerlettertoincreaseparticipationinastudyofcolorectalscreeningandsurveillance AT hilldavid randomizedcontrolledtrialoftheeffectivenessofaprerecruitmentprimerlettertoincreaseparticipationinastudyofcolorectalscreeningandsurveillance AT simmonsjody randomizedcontrolledtrialoftheeffectivenessofaprerecruitmentprimerlettertoincreaseparticipationinastudyofcolorectalscreeningandsurveillance AT roseshiho randomizedcontrolledtrialoftheeffectivenessofaprerecruitmentprimerlettertoincreaseparticipationinastudyofcolorectalscreeningandsurveillance |