Cargando…
Investigator feedback about the 2005 NIH diagnostic and scoring criteria for chronic GVHD
The 2005 National Institutes of Health (NIH) consensus criteria for chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD) have set standards for reporting. Many questions, however, have arisen regarding implementation and utilization. To identify perceived areas of controversy, we conducted an international sur...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3975688/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24464142 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/bmt.2013.225 |
_version_ | 1782310177301594112 |
---|---|
author | Inamoto, Yoshihiro Jagasia, Madan Wood, William A. Pidala, Joseph Palmer, Jeanne Khera, Nandita Weisdorf, Daniel Carpenter, Paul A. Flowers, Mary E.D. Jacobsohn, David Martin, Paul J. Lee, Stephanie J. Pavletic, Steven Z. |
author_facet | Inamoto, Yoshihiro Jagasia, Madan Wood, William A. Pidala, Joseph Palmer, Jeanne Khera, Nandita Weisdorf, Daniel Carpenter, Paul A. Flowers, Mary E.D. Jacobsohn, David Martin, Paul J. Lee, Stephanie J. Pavletic, Steven Z. |
author_sort | Inamoto, Yoshihiro |
collection | PubMed |
description | The 2005 National Institutes of Health (NIH) consensus criteria for chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD) have set standards for reporting. Many questions, however, have arisen regarding implementation and utilization. To identify perceived areas of controversy, we conducted an international survey on diagnosis and scoring of cGVHD. Agreement was observed for 50% to 83% of the 72 questions in 7 topic areas. There was agreement in the need for modifying criteria in 6 situations: 2 or more distinctive manifestations should be enough to diagnose cGVHD, symptoms not due to cGVHD should be scored differently, active disease and fixed deficits should be distinguished, a minimum threshold body surface area of hidebound skin involvement should be required for a skin score 3, asymptomatic oral lichenoid changes should be considered a score 1, and lung biopsy should be unnecessary to diagnose cGVHD in a patient with bronchiolitis obliterans as the only manifestation. The survey also identified 26 points of controversy. Whenever possible, studies should be conducted to confirm the appropriateness of any revisions. In cases where data are not available, clarification of the NIH recommendations by consensus is necessary. This survey should inform future research in the field and revisions of the current consensus criteria. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3975688 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-39756882014-10-01 Investigator feedback about the 2005 NIH diagnostic and scoring criteria for chronic GVHD Inamoto, Yoshihiro Jagasia, Madan Wood, William A. Pidala, Joseph Palmer, Jeanne Khera, Nandita Weisdorf, Daniel Carpenter, Paul A. Flowers, Mary E.D. Jacobsohn, David Martin, Paul J. Lee, Stephanie J. Pavletic, Steven Z. Bone Marrow Transplant Article The 2005 National Institutes of Health (NIH) consensus criteria for chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD) have set standards for reporting. Many questions, however, have arisen regarding implementation and utilization. To identify perceived areas of controversy, we conducted an international survey on diagnosis and scoring of cGVHD. Agreement was observed for 50% to 83% of the 72 questions in 7 topic areas. There was agreement in the need for modifying criteria in 6 situations: 2 or more distinctive manifestations should be enough to diagnose cGVHD, symptoms not due to cGVHD should be scored differently, active disease and fixed deficits should be distinguished, a minimum threshold body surface area of hidebound skin involvement should be required for a skin score 3, asymptomatic oral lichenoid changes should be considered a score 1, and lung biopsy should be unnecessary to diagnose cGVHD in a patient with bronchiolitis obliterans as the only manifestation. The survey also identified 26 points of controversy. Whenever possible, studies should be conducted to confirm the appropriateness of any revisions. In cases where data are not available, clarification of the NIH recommendations by consensus is necessary. This survey should inform future research in the field and revisions of the current consensus criteria. 2014-01-27 2014-04 /pmc/articles/PMC3975688/ /pubmed/24464142 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/bmt.2013.225 Text en Users may view, print, copy, download and text and data- mine the content in such documents, for the purposes of academic research, subject always to the full Conditions of use: http://www.nature.com/authors/editorial_policies/license.html#terms |
spellingShingle | Article Inamoto, Yoshihiro Jagasia, Madan Wood, William A. Pidala, Joseph Palmer, Jeanne Khera, Nandita Weisdorf, Daniel Carpenter, Paul A. Flowers, Mary E.D. Jacobsohn, David Martin, Paul J. Lee, Stephanie J. Pavletic, Steven Z. Investigator feedback about the 2005 NIH diagnostic and scoring criteria for chronic GVHD |
title | Investigator feedback about the 2005 NIH diagnostic and scoring criteria for chronic GVHD |
title_full | Investigator feedback about the 2005 NIH diagnostic and scoring criteria for chronic GVHD |
title_fullStr | Investigator feedback about the 2005 NIH diagnostic and scoring criteria for chronic GVHD |
title_full_unstemmed | Investigator feedback about the 2005 NIH diagnostic and scoring criteria for chronic GVHD |
title_short | Investigator feedback about the 2005 NIH diagnostic and scoring criteria for chronic GVHD |
title_sort | investigator feedback about the 2005 nih diagnostic and scoring criteria for chronic gvhd |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3975688/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24464142 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/bmt.2013.225 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT inamotoyoshihiro investigatorfeedbackaboutthe2005nihdiagnosticandscoringcriteriaforchronicgvhd AT jagasiamadan investigatorfeedbackaboutthe2005nihdiagnosticandscoringcriteriaforchronicgvhd AT woodwilliama investigatorfeedbackaboutthe2005nihdiagnosticandscoringcriteriaforchronicgvhd AT pidalajoseph investigatorfeedbackaboutthe2005nihdiagnosticandscoringcriteriaforchronicgvhd AT palmerjeanne investigatorfeedbackaboutthe2005nihdiagnosticandscoringcriteriaforchronicgvhd AT kheranandita investigatorfeedbackaboutthe2005nihdiagnosticandscoringcriteriaforchronicgvhd AT weisdorfdaniel investigatorfeedbackaboutthe2005nihdiagnosticandscoringcriteriaforchronicgvhd AT carpenterpaula investigatorfeedbackaboutthe2005nihdiagnosticandscoringcriteriaforchronicgvhd AT flowersmaryed investigatorfeedbackaboutthe2005nihdiagnosticandscoringcriteriaforchronicgvhd AT jacobsohndavid investigatorfeedbackaboutthe2005nihdiagnosticandscoringcriteriaforchronicgvhd AT martinpaulj investigatorfeedbackaboutthe2005nihdiagnosticandscoringcriteriaforchronicgvhd AT leestephaniej investigatorfeedbackaboutthe2005nihdiagnosticandscoringcriteriaforchronicgvhd AT pavleticstevenz investigatorfeedbackaboutthe2005nihdiagnosticandscoringcriteriaforchronicgvhd |